FIRST CHURCH AUTHORITY VS TOP DOWN AUTHORITY “BEING SUBMITTED””COVERING”

FIRST CHURCH AUTHORITY
ORGANIC FIRST CHURCH VS TOP DOWN AUTHORITY
plus “being submitted”  to ‘their governing authority’
Also “are you “under his covering”
Old Children’s Church Song: Pharoah, Pharoah, Let My people go!!
FORM VS THE RELATIONSHIP
(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI
FORERUNNER OPENING
TD has had more run in  with THIS hot topic, that I never heard until I left being “Southern Baptist” and went out following the Jesus People Days “to surf and study God’s leadership body” And it was everywhere back then, like it is now. And since the last part. of the 1980’s when the Called Assigned She went “to study” the many forms of the charismatics, all of whom do NOT do this, but it IS there and quite FORMIDABLE” Hence we teach. (I was under a sr pastor’s governing authority but it was in hindsight, Pauline Ephesians 5:21 which I describe being modeled by the Andy of Mayberry TV Show. Where Andy, the top sheriff, interacts and respects,  relates unto…his Aunt Bea, son Opie ,Deputy Barney Fife and all others in the town.

Question: In light of Eternity…Is it more important to love and follow Jesus than to be dominated and controlled by a Christian authority who is controlling and minimizing “certain styles of God Formed Pure Folks? Today we’re discussing “Original First Church and  and the widely accepted, truly popular “top down” authoritarian ‘possessing’ ministry model.

PASTOR T asks “What is, when is “following Christ” according to the Bible…and what is ” more like “belonging” to The Organization? Rather it’s about Apostle Paul Ephesians 4 Community; (more later on that)

The Rules: According to God’s Word and this Apostolic T

For the Record. I teach “Ephesians 4 Community”which must ‘transformed” in order to please Christ, to effect society. Also submission as Ephesians 5:21.

I am under the belief that each believer ‘must be sent ‘ to wherever GOD WANTS  THEM  TO GO, TO STAY AS LONG AS THEY LIKE but not to leave disgruntled, fault finding , complaining.  And THIS IS NOT  MY BUSINESS “where they go, if they go” for this is clearly abuse when, if I should monitor them. and accuse them.for that is clearly tied in with the ministry false teachings of witch watching patriarchal government minding all of our business, reporting back to others, seer spying on,  patrolling, ministry targeting LP elite shepherding movement.


In My Apostolic Ministry House Views;

 Rule: Based Apostle Paul Philippians 2: 12 and what is below: Each person must decide for themselves about attending church—where, how often, and what style of ministry or doctrine fits their personal relationship with the Lord.

Personally, I prefer services with long, deep worship. Howevere  I’m not promoting any one style, but I am well-versed in how to defrag bias, accusation an false authority… and retrain—even leadership—from religious control, legalism, and man-made doctrines.

For all to recognize: I didn’t go looking for white Levitical Patriarchism ( my own term)—it found me. I was sitting their very quietly in an audience, or walking onto the property. And to my big surprise  I got singled out (and every single USA Tim)—not because I desiring to become a celebrity or to “take them over” not was a “in search of one of their ministry men”  RATHER, I was being persecuted, but at the same, studying the Christian Body that moved in the gifts and great worship. 

I lived my life back then and as I do now. each and every day in non dominating ,peaceful very approachable and always deferring and respectful in accord with  Ephesians 5:21 and James 3:17: “‘pure, peaceable, easily entreated, full of mercy and good fruit, without partiality and without hypocrisy (which I wise each of these had this core respectful loving fruit)

I guess that  wasn’t “assigned” by God to join any one ministry. I view it as “one Community”..To note : I learned a few good things from some of these groups. Still, I was never attacked by WE are the Ruling World, WE CENTRIC “presumptive colonial” which is turf guarding, false religion, domination, or authoritarianism also reproducing many a non-diverse system, and also disturbing “appearing to be occult mind reading  “evil eye ‘psychic” and celebrity

That said, I do not view myself as having any “RIGHT” to dominate, accuse and force MY OWN BIBLE BELIEFS onto THEM or YOU…Yet these have made me very upset that this is going on in the mostly the prophetic big gifts moves. 

I will not attack them but I will correct, yet submit as Selah not autocratic hardcore doctrine.

For myself? I believe in mutual respect, not hierarchy.

I now prefer to teach and lead in my own God-given way, and I’ll be opening my new ministry office  soon in Fort Mill, SC.

Please keep in touch:
🌐 www.taveaucreativeleadership.com

NOW THE ARTICLE

30 Plus Years Evaluation: “When, if they are top down authority church, they are less likely to “respectfully relate”

 I. What Is the Bible’s First Organic Church? “Mutually submitted” servant leader

Let’s explore the “Bible First Organic Fellowship / Church” — what it looked like, how it operated, and how it differs from today’s top-down, hierarchical systems.

 Definition: “Bible First Organic Church”

The organic church refers to the earliest form of Christian fellowship as modeled in the Book of Acts, where Jesus Christ is the true head and the Holy Spirit leads directly. It is relational, Holy Spirit–dependent, and servant-leader-based, not controlled by a human hierarchy or religious institution. 

II. Key Characteristics of the First Organic Church

1. Jesus as the Only Head

  • Colossians 1:18“And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead…”

  • No one person—pastor, bishop, apostle—was above all others.

2. Servant Leadership

  • Ephesians 5:21“Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”

  • Leaders served the people, not lorded over them.

  • Matthew 20:25-28 – Jesus taught that greatness in God’s kingdom means being a servant.

3. Shared Ministry – Not Just the Clergy

  • 1 Corinthians 14:26“When ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine…”

  • All were allowed and expected to participate—men, women, slave, free.

4. House Churches – Not Religious Buildings

  • Acts 2:46“And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house…”

  • Ministry happened in homes, not cathedrals or mega-venues.

5. No Big Titles or Special Clothing

  • Matthew 23:8-10 – Jesus said: “Be not ye called Rabbi… neither be ye called masters…”

  • This was a warning against the start of religious superiority or celebrity-style ministers

 

 III. The Organization

I. Was There Organization? Yes — But It Was Functional, Not Hierarchical

The early church had function, not formal hierarchy:

Apostles, Prophets, Pastors, Teachers, Evangelists

  • Ephesians 4:11-13 – These were gifts to equip the saints—not a chain of command.

  • These leaders served to build up the body, not to control it.

Elders and Deacons

  • Chosen by the community for character, not charisma or control.

  • Acts 6:3“Look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom…”

 

  CONTRAST: Today’s “Top Church” vs. Bible Organic Church

Feature First Organic Church Top-Down Church System
Jesus as Head Yes  Often replaced by hierarchy
Servant Leadership  Mutual Submission
 Authoritarian Control
All May Speak  Participatory  One-Man Show
Gender/Race Neutrality  All Equal in Christ  Male-Dominated, Classist
House-to-House Homes & Fellowship  Buildings, Institutions
Holy Spirit Led  Spirit-directed Meetings  Program-Controlled

IV. Biblical Examples of First Church Operation

  1. Acts 2:42-47 – Community, shared meals, mutual giving, daily prayer.

  2. Acts 4:32-35 – No one claimed private ownership—radical generosity.

  3. Acts 15 – Disputes were settled in group counsel, not by a single authoritarian.

  4. Romans 16 – Paul greets a variety of leaders: men and women alike.

  5. 1 Corinthians 12 – The body of Christ has many members, all equal in value.

 My Aside:

TD asks Chat GPT 

My Key Questions

  1. Was one type of Christian ministry “subculture” over the church after Jesus left?
     No. Jesus left the church in the hands of all believers empowered by the Spirit, not a ruling class.

  2. Was any one minister over all other ministers?
     No. Even Paul submitted to the elders and fellow apostles (Acts 15).

  3. Were all men over all women?
     No. Galatians 3:28 says “there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

  4. Were women considered possessions?
     Not in the First Church. Jesus and Paul lifted women’s roles (e.g., Mary Magdalene, Priscilla, Phoebe).

  5. When did accusations and blocking of women enter the church?
    ++ Post-Constantine (313 AD) and Greco-Roman influence began to institutionalize hierarchy, including gender bias. Women were increasingly excluded and silenced.

PART 2  BEING SUBMITTED

First Church “Being In Submission”

Ephesians 5:21“Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”

This single verse, nestled in the context of Paul’s letter to the Ephesian church, introduces the attitude of mutual submission that should govern relationships within the body of Christ. Understanding this verse is key to grasping the true Christian understanding of authority and leadership as outlined by Paul, especially when compared with both ancient and modern hierarchical or authoritarian systems.

I. Context of Ephesians 5:21

Ephesians 5:21 is set within a broader teaching that spans Ephesians 5:21–6:9. Here, Paul is addressing how various relationships should be governed by mutual respect and submission. The “one to another” principle in verse 21 is foundational for understanding relationships in the church, marriage, families, and workplaces.

NOTE: In Ephesians 5:22–33, Paul goes on to specifically address the relationship between husbands and wives, while in Ephesians 6:1–9, he addresses children/parents and servants/masters. However, verse 21 sets the tone by introducing mutual submission as the basis for all of these relationships.

II. The Principle of Mutual Submission

1. Submission in Christ’s Kingdom

  • Ephesians 5:21 calls for mutual submission, which is based on Christ’s humility and sacrifice. Jesus, who is the head of the Church, laid down His life in service to others (Philippians 2:5–8). This mutual submission is voluntary, selfless, and driven by love.

2. How It Applies to Different Relationships

  • Husbands and Wives (Ephesians 5:22-33):
    Wives are encouraged to submit ‘respect one another’s boundaries, to defer” both Christian men and women..meaning they choose to dwell according to ,submitted to “the Bible.’ a collaborating’ mutually honoring and respecting “teammate mate ” type of relationship. Not a LP Power struggle, but respecting yielding ‘mutually” and in long lasting Christ following ‘relationship” (not an endured servant)  Wise example is of national judge, prophet office, leader Deborah and wedded husband, Lapidoth. The key here is that husbands’ authority is not authoritarian and is mutually submitted, with the leader husband, the head of household,but of her Hebrew  Judge office. He is evidently “Man enough” to handler HER authority. 

  • Christ’s servant leadership. A husband who exercises leadership must lead by self-sacrifice, love, and respect for his wife’s dignity and contribution. And she must respect. r

  • Children and Parents (Ephesians 6:1-4):
    Children are called to honor and obey their parents. However, parents (especially fathers) are warned not to provoke their children to anger, but to raise them in a loving, respectful manner.

  • Servants and Masters (Ephesians 6:5-9):
    Paul speaks to bondservants to obey their earthly masters, but masters are also told to treat their servants well, knowing that they have the same Master in heaven. This teaches that authority in Christ’s kingdom is never exploitative, but always mindful of the dignity of others.

3. Who Does Ephesians 5:21 Apply to Then and Now?

++ The Early Church Context (Then)

  • The Ephesian church was a mixed community, with various ethnicities, genders, and social statuses, united in Christ.

  • Paul’s teaching of mutual submission countered the prevailing Roman culture of hierarchical dominance. This was radical because the Roman world was structured around patriarchy, classism, and the imperial cult, which upheld rulers as divine figures with supreme authority.

  • In this context, Paul’s Ephesians 5:21 principle was transformative, advocating a new way for the Church to relate to one another — mutual respect, care, and service, where no one was superior to the other, regardless of gender or social class

    ++ The Modern Church Context (Now)

  • In today’s church, Ephesians 5:21 challenges hierarchical models of leadership where certain leaders or gender roles are seen as inherently superior or more authoritative than others.

  • The “Top-Down” Authority system, common in some churches today, conflicts with this foundational teaching of mutual submission. While strong leadership is necessary, true Christian leadership is rooted in servant leadership, modeled after Christ.

  • In modern churches, this verse applies to all relationships — not just in marriage, but in how we treat fellow believers, the way we lead ministries, and how we structure our church community. Church members, leaders, and laypeople should be marked by humility, love, and service toward one another.

++ Mutual Submission vs. Top-Down Authority

  • Mutual Submission (Ephesians 5:21) emphasizes servant leadership. Leadership is not authoritarian or domineering but is exercised with care, humility, and sacrifice.

  • Top-Down Authority is a model where the leader is seen as a figure of ultimate power, often making decisions without consultation, expecting unquestioned obedience. It’s the opposite of mutual submission because it emphasizes control rather than mutual respect.

III. Examples of True Leadership vs. Authoritarian Leadership

  1. True Leadership: A strong leader who exercises authority with grace, is willing to listen, shares responsibility, and models sacrificial love and humility.

    • Jesus washing His disciples’ feet (John 13:12-17).

    • Paul not imposing his authority over the churches but encouraging the believers to follow him as he followed Christ (1 Corinthians 11:1).

  2. Authoritarian Leadership: A leader who demands complete control, suppresses dissent, uses power to manipulate, and does not serve others. Often the leader is more focused on self-preservation, and the well-being of others (particularly those in lower positions) is ignored or secondary.

    • 1 Samuel 2: Eli’s failure to confront his sons is an example of passive authoritarianism, where leadership is weak, and moral compromise is tolerated for the sake of control.

    • Matthew 23:1-7: Jesus rebukes the Pharisees for their hypocrisy and authoritarianism, where they burdened people with rules and expectations while refusing to help them.

IV. Conclusion: Ephesians 5:21 Today

  • Ephesians 5:21 calls the church to a radical way of being together — not as one where power is wielded over people, but where all members are willing to submit to each other in love, just as Christ submits to the Father.

  • This mutual submission allows for strong, authentic leadership but without control or oppression. When we submit to each other, it reflects the gospelChrist’s submission to the Father and sacrifice for humanity.

In modern churches, where authority can sometimes become a power struggle, Ephesians 5:21 challenges us to create communities where everyone’s voice matters, leaders serve with humility, and relationships are built on mutual respect.

Part 3. Historic Bible “Submission” Then and Now Overview

I. First Church vs Top-Down Church

Here is a clear comparison chart of the First (Organic) Church model versus the Modern Top-Down Church System (often seen in authoritarian or “Levitical Patriarchal” structures):

Category First (Organic) Church Modern Top-Down Authoritarian Church
Leadership Style Servant-leaders (Eph. 5:21, Matt. 20:25-28) Hierarchical rulers (“My way or the highway”)
Decision Making By group discernment (Acts 15 council; Acts 13:1-3) By one main leader or apostle who must be obeyed
View of Women Respected & active leaders (Phoebe, Junia, Priscilla, Acts 21:9) Subordinate to all men; must be “covered” or silent
Submission Mutual submission (Eph. 5:21) One-way submission from everyone to leaders
Teaching Style Interactive, Holy Spirit-led (Acts 2:42; 1 Cor. 14:26) Mostly one-way monologue from pulpit; audience is silent
Spiritual Gifts Use Every believer active (1 Cor. 12–14; Rom. 12:6-8) Reserved for staff or only male elders
Accountability Shared among elders (Acts 20:28; Titus 1:5) Accountability only upward to head pastor
Community Feel Family of equals (Gal. 3:28; Acts 2:44-46) Corporate, controlled, performance-based
Finances Shared resources and generosity (Acts 4:32-35) Tithes collected under strict obedience or fear of curse
Source of Authority The Holy Spirit and the Word Leader’s vision or private revelation
View of Dissent/Questions Welcomed (Acts 17:11; 1 John 4:1) Discouraged, seen as rebellion or “Jezebel spirit”
How Leaders Lead By example, not force (1 Pet. 5:3) By titles, status, commands
Structure Flexible, Spirit-led house fellowships (Romans 16) Rigid organization chart with CEO-style senior pastor
Atmosphere Intimate, humble, collaborative Formal, controlling, fear-based( PS Targeting cult)

 II. YES OR NO. Was there any  First Church “RULE” That Taught:

  1. One subculture of ‘ministry” ruled the whole church after Jesus left?
      No.

  2. One minister was over all others?
      No. Paul said: “I planted, Apollos watered… God gave the increase.” (1 Cor. 3:6-7)

  3. Were ALL men were over ALL women?
      No. Galatians 3:28 says “neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ.”

  4. Women were property or second class?
     No. Jesus and Paul uplifted women: “Daughter, be of good cheer…” (Matt. 9:22)

  5. Women were blocked, accused, and undermined in ministry?
     Not until later church tradition, not from Jesus or the apostles.

III. Final Thoughts

The First Church was a Spirit-led, Christ-centered community where leadership meant service, not control.

The modern top-down model, especially when fused with Levitical Patriarchal Boys’ Club thinking, often enforces man-made rules in God’s name, leading to:

  • Spiritual abuse

  • Silencing of women

  • Suppression of gifts

  • Legalism instead of liberty

“Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free…”
Galatians 5:1

IV. The Top Down Authoritarian View:

This kind of Christian leadership that says:

  • “My way or the highway”

  • “Do not question authority”

  • “You must be submitted to us”

  • “Women must be under male covering or are out of order”

  • “Don’t think for yourself”

…is not biblical servant leadership. It is ballistic authoritarianism cloaked in religious language. Let’s break this down clearly and biblically

V. Point:  This “Submission-itis Forevefr Accusing” Teaching… Is Not Jesus’ Model

Jesus never controlled, bullied, or demanded blind submission.

He said:

“Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest… for I am meek and lowly in heart.” — Matthew 11:28-30

  • He invited, not forced.
  • He taught, not dominated.
  • He washed feet, even of Judas.
  • He one to one directly confronted, rather than Pharisee accuser or slander or listen to the gossip
  • He let people walk away if they didn’t want truth (John 6:66–67).

 VI. Paul Taught Servant Leadership — Not Tyranny

Paul said:

Not that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy…” — 2 Corinthians 1:24
“Let all things be done decently and in order.” — 1 Corinthians 14:40

Order in the Church is not domination, it is mutual respect, structure, and love. Paul did not teach “you must do what I say or else”. He reasoned from Scripture and appealed to conscience, not coercion.

 The “Don’t Think, Just Submit” Culture = Cult-like Control

This mirrors cult behavior, not Christian community:

  • Silencing questions = spiritual abuse

  • Denying individuality = control, not fellowship

  • Forcing submission to humans over God = dangerous

Even the Bereans were praised for testing Paul’s words:

“They received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” — Acts 17:11

That means: God encourages you to think, question, and study for yourself.

 The “All Women Must Be Covered by a Man” Doctrine

This teaching did not exist in the First Church as a universal requirement. It’s a manmade tradition that conflates patriarchal culture with eternal truth.

  • There were female leaders in Paul’s time:

    • Junia: called an apostle (Romans 16:7)

    • Phoebe: a deacon (Romans 16:1)

    • Priscilla: helped teach Apollos, a powerful male preacher (Acts 18:26)

    • Philip’s daughters: prophetesses (Acts 21:9)

There is no biblical law that says “every woman must be covered by a man in ministry.” This is Old Testament law or Levitical Patriarchy, not the gospel of Christ

 Paul’s Teaching on Submission Is Mutual, Not One-Way

Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.” — Ephesians 5:21

It’s not:

  • “Wives submit, and husbands dominate”

  • “Lay people submit, leaders rule”

  • “Women obey, men control”

That’s top-down authoritarianism, and Jesus condemned it:

“You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them… Not so with you.” — Matthew 20:25-26

 VII.Summary: How to Discern Healthy vs Toxic Leadership

Old Children’s Church Song: Pharoah, Pharoah, Let My people go!!
Biblical Servant Leadership Authoritarian Control
Invites and teaches Commands and forces
Leads by example (1 Peter 5:3) Demands blind obedience
Values all voices Silences dissent
Encourages thinking (Acts 17:11) Says “Don’t question me”
Honors both men & women Demotes women
Submits mutually (Eph. 5:21) Demands submission one-way
Resembles Jesus Resembles Pharaoh

 

Next Part: COVERING

The topic of “covering” in Christian circles—especially regarding women, persons in ministry, and submission to pastoral authority—is widely discussed and often divisive. Let’s break it down with clarity, Bible context, and historical insight.

 1. WHAT IS “COVERING” IN MODERN CHRISTIANITY?

“Covering” is often taught as:

  • A spiritual protection or accountability structure

  • Being under a person’s or a church’s authority to avoid deception or error

  • A requirement for women, especially, to be “covered by a man” in ministry or leadership

  • A “chain of command” model, often used in top-down or authoritarian church systems

 2. WHERE DOES THIS IDEA COME FROM?

Not directly from Jesus or Paul. The concept of spiritual covering as a doctrine has no explicit New Testament command.

But it’s often pulled from:

  • 1 Corinthians 11:3-10 – Head coverings & “headship”

  • Hebrews 13:17 – “Obey your leaders”

  • Numbers 30 – Vows made by women needing male confirmation

  • Old Testament priestly models (Levitical systems)

These verses are often lifted out of cultural and historical context and applied rigidly.

 BIBLICAL LOOK: FIRST CHURCH VS MODERN “COVERING” DOCTRINE

T asks Chat GPT to research the any Bible scripture which mentions the word “covering” (as in back in the Bible first church.

This is what is said
The New Testament (First Church era) does not teach the concept of “pastoral covering” in the way it is often used today (as a spiritual hierarchy where everyone must be “under” someone). However, the word “covering” or “cover” does appear in a few contexts — but not as church control or hierarchy.

1. 1 Corinthians 11:3-10 (Head Coverings)

This is about literal head coverings, not authority chains:

“But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head…”
(1 Corinthians 11:5)

This passage has been debated — some interpret it culturally (Corinthian custom), not as doctrine. Paul speaks of honor, propriety, and mutual respectnot domination or hierarchy of male covering.

2. 1 Peter 4:8

“Love covers a multitude of sins.”

This is about grace and forgiveness, not submission under authority.

3. James 5:20“…shall save a soul from death, and shall cover a multitude of sins.”

Again, “cover” = mercy, not chain of command.

4. Romans 4:7 / Psalm 32:1 (Quoted by Paul)

“Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.”

This refers to God’s covering — His mercy through Christ — not pastoral oversight.

Key: No Verse in Acts or Epistles says:

  • Women must be “covered” by men or pastors.

  • Believers must be under a “spiritual covering” to be safe or legitimate.

  • A pastor is a gatekeeper of access to God or calling.

Summary:

Biblical “covering” =

  • Mercy, grace, protection by God

  • NOT a top-down chain of control

  • NOT gender-based hierarchy

  • NOT “you must submit to a man/pastor to be safe”

“Covering” as control is a modern doctrine, not First Church.

 Let Make it Plain:  WHAT IS “COVERING” IN MODERN CHRISTIANITY?

“Covering” is often taught as:

  • A spiritual protection or accountability structure

  • Being under a person’s or a church’s authority to avoid deception or error

  • A requirement for women, especially, to be “covered by a man” in ministry or leadership

  • A “chain of command” model, often used in top-down or authoritarian church systems

 2. WHERE DOES THIS IDEA COME FROM?

Not directly from Jesus or Paul. The concept of spiritual covering as a doctrine has no explicit New Testament command.

But it’s often pulled from:

  • 1 Corinthians 11:3-10 – Head coverings & “headship”

  • Hebrews 13:17 – “Obey your leaders”

  • Numbers 30 – Vows made by women needing male confirmation

  • Old Testament priestly models (Levitical systems)

These verses are often lifted out of cultural and historical context and applied rigidly.

 3. BIBLICAL LOOK: FIRST CHURCH VS MODERN “COVERING” DOCTRINE

First (Organic) Church Modern Covering Model
Servant leadership (Eph 5:21) Hierarchical leadership (“My way or highway”)
All believers priesthood (1 Peter 2:9) Pastor or apostle over everyone else
Women led and prophesied (Acts 2:17-18) Women must be under male covering
Led by Holy Spirit (Acts 13:2) Submitted to man-made rank/chains of command
Mutual submission (Gal 3:28) Male-dominant, control-based

4. WHO WAS “COVERING” JESUS?

Jesus wasn’t “covered” by any earthly spiritual authority. He submitted to God the Father and obeyed the Holy Spirit (John 5:19). He was not under a Levitical priest, nor Pharisee, nor temple-sanctioned authority. He modeled Spirit-led autonomy and humble submission to God

 5. WHAT ABOUT WOMEN?

Examples of uncovered, Spirit-led women:

  • Deborah (Judges 4) – A prophetess and judge, no male covering

  • Mary Magdalene – First to see risen Christ and commission the apostles (John 20)

  • Phoebe (Romans 16:1) – Called a “deacon” and trusted leader

  • Priscilla (Acts 18) – Taught alongside her husband, named first

Nowhere in the New Testament does it say a woman must be under a man’s “covering” to lead, speak, prophesy, or follow God.

 6. DANGERS OF THE “COVERING DOCTRINE”

  • Control and spiritual abuse

  • Silencing women, creatives, and non-conforming individuals

  • Creating clergy-laity divide

  • Promoting fear-based obedience

  • Encouraging idolatry of leadership

 7. TRUE SPIRITUAL COVERING

According to the Bible:

 1.God is our covering – Psalm 91:4
 2.Christ is our Head – Colossians 1:18
 3.Holy Spirit leads all – Romans 8:14
 4.The Body serves one another – Galatians 5:13

 8. QUESTIONS TO ASK

  • Is this “covering” structure Spirit-led or fear-based?

  • Does it build up the Body of Christ—or build a control system?

  • Does it reflect Jesus’ model of leadership?

 CONCLUSION

A healthy ministry respects servant leadership, mutual accountability, and Spirit-led discipleship—not rigid, man-made coverings.

Galatians 3:28

“There is neither Jew nor Gentile, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

Let the Church return to that model.

Taveau closes and says:

to Each Their Own: I just submit the research.

It’s nothing “personal” “directed” at any  of these LP Big Bosses, for most of them have never ever heard of this deep research

Also,

Submitted as respectful Selah in the pure accustomed, Taveau D’Arcy James 3:17 abiding fruit, from a mature one,  who is a Galatians 1:1-2, Acts 17:17 and who ‘Submitted to all” in Pauline Ephesians 5:21.

TO SUPPORT the work in defragging legalism, bias and the word curse law :

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI


Discover more from PURPOSE OF THIS MINISTRY AI + I SITE

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply