This in an intentionally “Biblically grounded” proven over the test of time, timely article that avoids secular “women’s lib” framing and instead examines respect for ALL kinds of men, and women, but defines the word ‘patriarch” (wise, mostly stable, team, family, ministry, busines anchor disposition,usually great for counsel, stability and a stable provider, any race, status or belief set). However, the words Levitical Patriarch (coined by Sister Taveau after repeatedly discovering this in the WELP usually prophetic doctrinal “relationship effecting ” fruit.. is yet another.

Hence we calmly address the term ” patriarchal overreach” within the biblical, historical, and spiritual context, focusing on Jesus, Paul, and the early Church, while addressing big concerns about overreaching LP in many WELP, cessationists, fundamentalists, the shepherding movementm and more..

LP is found in their LM appointed strict Levitical Matriarchs who are usually their similar dominating sharp shooters to far off sly ‘divine’ (deep inner psychic “Holy Spirit” scan) then target, report back, pray against, This is WHY I am not affiliated with the impure these. Not I John 1:7 Healthy)

Blessings, Sr Pastor T- EORR Cross Body Unity, Intl. “Teammates WITH the Body of Christ”

PART 4 HISTORY OF THE MINISTRY PATRIARCHY

# 2 re Patriarchal Overreach: When Authority Exceeds Christ’s Example

“The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them… But it shall not be so among you: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.”
(Luke 22:25–26 KJV)

Have we reached the Bible status days of “We are rich and have want of nothing” in these seer movements?

Let This Be Considered A Safe Space to Inquire:
When Jesus Christ turned over the fund raising tables in the Hebrew Levitical Patriarch Temple Pharisee system (well known teaching based on Matthew 21:12-13) The mature system overseers, probably accused HIM (the younger, perceived as junior to them) non famous “minister’ as as being “jealous” ‘offended” “envious” of their perks, power and chief position…also a subversive underminer, and maybe a “sheep stealer” “office supplanter” and/or another “false prophet” who was biased and “critical” as well as”unsubmitted” ” in rebellion” to “their” own ministry authority.

And this is still how it happens out in ministry fields of many aspiring WELP shepherding tale bearing herd owning mostly LP (Christian Ministry Sunny South Patriarchy) .

Thus, on behalf of Jesus, His many normal persons, this collaborative Cross Body Unity, EORR Christian movement (another training perspective, sr office ministry viewpoint and a lamp stand micro, mega prototype based on a Galatians 1:1-2 even Acts 17:17, and Ephesians 5:21 (submitted to all) family like, global perspective.

Now please view this as simply “myself” serving the many fellow ministers, in providing an alternative, yet not accusing, just delivering) I state Sweet Baby Jesus Christ could remain the easy to control, cozy infant when He repeatedly saw the money centric ministry which defiled and used, accuse, controlled multiplied many. Jesus did not accuse, attack, berate, lecture or use weapons when He strode into the temple that declared.. a prophetic act. To shock and awe and command their undivided attention.

Hence: Jesus was NOT “offended’ “being critical” “contentious ” or undermining the in place authority”

NO. Christ ROSE UP for He was SENT* (**after checking in with Father John 5, as normal)

for clearly His Father was FED UP.**

** Hierarchal FED UP 1 Old Testament: Another extreme but important example of when the Father was Fed Up: The Ichabod Temple Cleanse of the Eli Temple High Priesthood , as that ties in with the Christian movement describe in this article) (read the character big issues in I Samuel 1-3)

Taveau asks this FIRST QUESTION to Chat GPT AI:

Q. What Is True Biblical Authority?

Chat GPT AI answers:

Biblical authority is:

Relational – rooted in covenant, not control.
Servant-hearted – modeled after Jesus, who washed feet (John 13:14–15).
Gift-based – built on spiritual gifting, calling, and fruit (1 Corinthians 12).
Mutual – all believers are submitted to Christ and one another (Ephesians 5:21).
Accountable – no one is above correction, male or female.

QUESTION TWO:

Taveau Asks:

What Should We Do Now About Following, also Delegating, Supporting, Abiding Under, Serving, Complying with presented Christian Ministry “Authority””

Chat GPT AI responds:

It’s time to return to the First Church model—not replicate modern power structures or culture wars. We must:

Discern doctrine by fruit and scripture, not titles or social media campaigns.
Affirm women and men, all colors and sizes and types.. in ministry based on the Spirit’s call and biblical fruit.
Reject public shaming, name-calling, and ministry gossip—whether aimed at prosperity preachers, women, or Spirit-led believers. Or the local fellow pastor, prophet or woman leader, wonder working or not!
POINT: TD teaches ministers regarding; Motives, Mindsets, Mind Fields, Methodologies and Use of Tone”
Rebuild unity across the body, not by enforcing sameness, but by welcoming diverse callings under Christ’s Lordship.

Let us honor Jesus—not a tradition of men—as the true head of the Church.

QUESTION 3

Taveau asks Chat GPT Apply all of this to the local Christian also diverse, over all abiding Community**
**”which by now, ought be office well trained in Pauline Ephesians 4 Basic Community Insight

Chat GPT answers:
In today’s Christian landscape, a troubling pattern is emerging in some doctrinally conservative circles, particularly among those holding to cessationist views: an authoritarian form of patriarchy that distorts both Christian Bible developing manhood and servant leadership. It denies correction, self introspection and it avoids relation with the Most High God and respects just a few ‘pre qualifying’ types of similar human persons, mostly the same race, social status and beliefs regarding Book of Acts, Holy Spirit, This also applies to the many suspicious foes of this more diverse EORR Cross Body Movement, the ‘turf protectors’ which I have submitted to in James 3;17 abiding perpetual Ephesians 5:2 1 (first Church) “mutual submission fruit” but still got targeted, by their LP fine men and the LM Police solemn women.

Trust Point:

All note that I already, prior to this, and many times.. explained my happy childhood, my Christian sr pastor father and my desire to all men the lead, before, So I do not have to share that again

And I am addressing. I will define it as I view it:

1. A lone stranger (newbie, expat ,leader taking off from their own ministry, a single mother, an abused wife, angel unawares) chooses to visit or/or maybe tries to ongoing attend a mostly LP shepherding Governing Ministry Patiarchal Movement and is immediately ‘far off accuser targeted” based on the following 1. Looks, 2. Age 3 Type, 4. Race, 5 ,Gender, 6. Size and I would use this word to relate to the Office Seers , Apostles, Prophets, NAR movement: 7 Vibe, Energy”as that is all it takes to a LP sage ministry and demonic dark spirit to “manifest” to rise up and start to aggress. I have witnessed this since God first began to send me to study the Charismatic, long worship’, ‘prophetic, now celebrity affected yet moral movements.’

Vain Leader Point:

1.It is a “sin” to use Jesus Christ safe and honest Hero Name to advertise YOUR “Christian ministry” or conference or group but then when one and all arrive YOU (they ) only want their own fellowship color, preferred age, look, movement style” for all those that do “fit” the required “appearance” are biased against, racially profiled and often using occult targeted.

2. It is “false advertising” and what a real estate again may regard “bait and switch, ” Means : advertise to one and all that THIS is Jesus House, which is commonly well known in all history to be guaranteed to be SAFE ,RESPECTFUL, WELCOME TO ALL MEN, WOMEN and OTHERS. ALL RACES, CREEDS, AGES, SIZES AND MATURITIES…one would believe. However, this far from the truth. For now celebrity has made a click, clain, club, and devout “cult.” Biased, divisive and ministry self centric.

The more I look at this, the more I detect the same destructive spirit as did servant elder, Apostle Paul, back in the early church seaport of Corinth, where he strongly admonished the the fleshly immature church: “WE are PRO Gifted Paul” ..”NO, WE are PRO eloquent speaker APOLLOS!” NO! We are PRO Hard Rock CEPHAS!” (read I Corinthians 1)”the Divisive Quality of Celebrity in the church”

Human Tactics: Bait people in using Christ Jesus Name, for they understand that many attending persons, will drop many offerings in their collection plates

Yet, the many innocent, many non famous True Christians, and/or seeking persons, each arrive, many are spy at the door, profiled by in house negative stereotype, warred against by occult anti them many prayers and repeatedly biased against, scowled at, doubted, withstood and looked down on and marginalized, snubbed and intentionally ignored!

This is self righteous, anti the Christ… also wicked!

MEGA MINI SHEKEL U PHARISEES
Word of the Lord , Deep South included, about about 2021

QUESTION 4: The Principal and Power Of Pride:

King David in Psalm 123:3–4 (KJV):

3 Have mercy upon us, O Lord, have mercy upon us:
for we are exceedingly filled with contempt.

4 Our soul (human mind, will, emotion) is exceedingly filled
with the scorning of those that are at ease,
and with the contempt of the proud.

And this was this learning curve..how wise, discerning and true, many pure hearted, yet ‘ far away human persons will understand (by the gift of discernment) when they are being biased against” King David understood that.

MAKING A POINT: Respecter of Persons Lack of Christ Like Respect and Genuine Caring Love

TD Says, that

“The Lowest Bar in Sharing Christ is to give them YOUR real RESPECT!”

(See Psalm 123:3-4 below)

Reason: For the surely many thousands of valuable, genuine people (means Christians or not, all races, genders, sizes, looks) will “inner” perceive it..for they’ve been through TOO MUCH accusation, mean turf bias, ministry, lay, whole area disrespect..BEFORE YOU and I ever met them.(can includes parents, preachers, prophets, neighbors, random human persons, on TV, Media and the negative, accusing, indifferent subculture)

Please describe the Bible meanings of “respecter of persons” verses from the King James Version (KJV) — these show that God does not show favoritism, and He expects justice, equality, and impartiality from leaders:

Chat GPT Answers

Key “Respecter of Persons” Verses (KJV)

1. Acts 10:34

Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

** Context: Peter realizes that salvation and the Holy Spirit are for all people — not just Jews. This verse demolishes spiritual elitism and ethnic or gender-based superiority

2. Romans 2:11

“For there is no respect of persons with God.”

** Context: God judges righteously — not based on status, background, or position — but according to truth and deeds.

3. James 2:1–4

1 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.
2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;
3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:
4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?

** Context: This condemns favoritism in church, especially based on wealth or appearance. A strong rebuke of partiality in ministry or leadership.

4. Ephesians 6:9

And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.

** Context: Even employers or leaders must lead without arrogance or abuse, because God shows no favoritism — and holds all accountable.

5. Colossians 3:25

But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons.

** Context: God judges wrongdoing fairly, regardless of who commits it — bishop, prophet, pastor, or layperson.

6. Deuteronomy 10:17

For the Lord your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:

** Context: God’s justice cannot be bought or swayed. No partiality. No bribes. No spiritual boys’ club.

Taveau’s Bottom Line:

God is not impressed by position, wealth, title, gender, or power.
All who claim to represent Him must reflect that impartiality — or they are out of order, and in sin.
This is a strong correction to any ministry hierarchy that shows favoritism toward men, celebrity leaders, or “insiders” — while scorning others, especially women, the poor, or those outside their group.

Let this be a plumbline for true apostolic leadership in the fear of the Lord.

Deeply Compassion Fatigued

I asked Chat GPT AI to explain it more on behalf of the compassion fatigued ,nearly universal, Big Boss, church.

It responded:

Context & Meaning

Psalm 123: 3-4 is a cry for God’s mercy from those who are oppressed, disrespected, or mocked by the arrogant and comfortable. It reflects the pain of those who have been looked down on, slandered, or marginalized — especially by those in positions of power or privilege.

It aligns with your earlier themes:

The “scorning of those at ease” reflects those in power who criticize or control others from a place of comfort or superiority.
The “contempt of the proud” mirrors modern spiritual abuse, judgment, or elitism often seen in authoritarian or patriarchal systems.

This psalm is a prayer of the humble, asking God to respond to injustice and prideful oppression.

POINT: Taveau continues:

Hence this writer is making a “extremely long term” ministry overseer sr office “complaint” “*using false religions, evil eye, which is witchcraft, and respecter of persons spirit” “divining” and “age, gender, looks, big biased” and anti I John 1:7 in being that.

As all of this is similar to “Exodus 20:3 ‘Thou shalt not use the name of the Lord thy God in vain. I will not hold them guiltless, for using My Name in vain.”

2. This COULD be a ‘sin of ignorance” .plus the lack of training and a mistaken use of “failing to discern the body of Christ correctly” (brings down t 2 curses) But the accusing many (accusing false witness as in “NO RESPECT otherwise they would RELATE in Eph 1:6, 5:21, 4) and I John 1:7…in this unhealthy fashion is rampant..at least in the monied deep south and southwest. and nearly everywhere. And in South Africa, as I know for a fact. (as it’s mostly all Colonial). This openly reveals it’s “false” authoritarian and most abiding Levitical Patriarchal “Top Down Church” (non servant elders as I have defined and equipped before) to govern control.

AND TO ALL OF THESE

I Samuel Eli and the Good Ole Boys Club “Boys will be boys’ in Christian Ministry

TD Says to the Devout Reader: Google search ( as I have written on this repeatedly for 12 years)
I SAMUEL 1- 3 Defiling, abusing, using, many Christian women (See Eli and both sons in I Samuel 1 who were all the LP Levitical Patriarchs, who also exemplify the worst case Ministry Patriarchy: The use of human bodies, leader women, also now men, children, and money)

This, to me, makes me leary of (non family feel, mostly who are the remnant) charismatics, And while all Christian ministries may or may not do it, it specifically aggresses, and top down witch watches , accuses me, without one iota of respectful relationship..

Hence I know a powerful lot, because as a seer apostolic prophet who is sent to study the Body of Christ in leadership, since 1976, before these movements manifested to be so big, and have much influence and celebrity, I can note when I am being dark scanned ..as my “defense” given by God “the leader discernment of spirits” but I then am quickened to understand (perceive, discern) that I am being “defiled, monitored ,targeted” (as they evidently do this too many way long before I got there) and so must need me to know about this and to Biblically correct, reprove and to warn the mostly witch watching, turf guarding totalitarian Western European Levitical Patriarchal, L Matriarchal enormous cult like accusing biased “whore spying” subcultures.

JESUS IN MATTHEW 23 A Rebuke of Religious Hierarchy

Accepted Phariseeism: What Jesus Said and Meant in Matthew 23:8–10

Taveau asks ChatGPT

Was Jesus addressing the misuse of authority and the rise of a kind of spiritual patriarchy or hierarchy that had corrupted the religious leadership of His day.

Chat GPT responds:

In Matthew 23, Jesus delivers a strong rebuke to the scribes and Pharisees, who were the religious elites and spiritual leaders in Israel. His criticism targets their pride, hypocrisy, legalism, and their love for titles, positions of honor, and authoritative control over others.

Let’s break it down:

“But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.” (v. 8)
Key Point: Jesus levels the playing field. He says “all ye are brethren”, meaning there is no spiritual class system — no elite tier. This directly undercuts a ministry patriarchy mindset.

“And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.” (v. 9)
Key Point: Jesus isn’t talking about biological fathers — He’s confronting the religious practice of assigning spiritual superiority or covering through exalted titles. This also speaks against a Levitical-style control structure where someone assumes authority over your direct access to God.

“Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.” (v. 10)
Key Point: The warning here is against assuming lordship over others’ spiritual lives. Christ alone is the Head of the Church.

PART 5 HOT STUFF….WOMEN, HEADSHIP

PHARISEE, LAY LEADERS COMMON PRESUMPTION:

IS A CHRISTIAN MAN OVER EVERY CHRISTIAN WOMAN?

“But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.” “I Corinthians 11:3

Understanding 1 Corinthians 11:3 and Its Implications

1 Corinthians 11:3 is a key passage that often comes up in discussions about headship and authority in the Christian faith. The verse reads:

“But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.”

This passage has been interpreted in various ways throughout church history, and some of the confusion stems from how headship is understood in context.

I will break it down and address these concerns, especially regarding how this applies to relationships, leadership, and spiritual authority in the Church.

TD wants to know:
What Does “The Head of Every Man is Christ” Mean?

Chat GPT answers:
The phrase “the head of every man is Christ” indicates that Christ holds ultimate authority over every man in the body of Christ. This is a direct reference to the lordship of Jesus over all believers—whether male or female.

For every Christian man, his ultimate headship comes from Christ, meaning that Christ is his spiritual authority and the one to whom he submits. This does not mean that other men are in a place of authority over him unless there is a specific context, such as a pastor or leader within the church. The idea is that Christ is the highest authority over every Christian man.

Sister Taveau asks:

What Does “The Head of a Woman is Man” Mean?

The phrase “the head of a woman is man” has been one of the most debated aspects of this verse. The term “head” in this context is often understood to refer to leadership or authority. However, it’s essential to recognize the cultural and historical context in which Paul was writing.

In the culture of the time, patriarchal structures were prominent, and women were often seen in a subordinate role to men. This is why Paul speaks to the issue of order within the family and the church. The passage doesn’t suggest that all men are over all women in a universal, domineering sense. Rather, it speaks specifically about marriage and spiritual headship within the context of the home and church leadership.

The headship of a man over a woman in this passage is primarily addressed in the context of marriage or when a woman is under the authority of a specific pastor or leader. It doesn’t imply that every Christian man is the head of every woman in every setting. Instead, it implies that within the context of marriage or a church family (under specific leadership), the man holds a leadership role, and the woman, in those contexts, is to submit to him as part of the relational dynamic.

TD Asks:

How Does This Apply to Marriage vs. Church Leadership?

Chat GPT replies

Marriage Context:
In marriage, this passage is typically understood to mean that the husband is the spiritual leader in the home. Ephesians 5:21-33 elaborates on this, showing that husbands are called to love their wives sacrificially, just as Christ loves the Church. The wife, in turn, submits to her husband’s leadership, but it is always mutual in love and respect (Ephesians 5:21).

So, in marriage, the husband is the head of the wife. This does not mean he has absolute control or authority in an authoritarian sense. Rather, it refers to the husband’s role as a servant-leader, which is marked by humility, care, and sacrificial love. The wife’s submission is in response to this loving leadership.
Church Context:
When it comes to church leadership, the situation is a little different. The phrase “the head of a woman is man” in this context can be interpreted as meaning that in the church structure, leadership roles are often assumed by men (based on other teachings in the New Testament, like 1 Timothy 2:12 and Titus 1:6). However, this does not mean that men have absolute authority over all women in the church. It means that in terms of church governance (such as elders, pastors, or overseers), men are typically called to hold those positions, though there are many debates on the interpretation and application of this.

For women who choose to be” under a pastor” (a specific term in various Country Law movements) or a specific leadership structure, they are under that authority, not because all men have authority over them universally, but because they have voluntarily placed themselves under the spiritual covering and leadership of that particular pastor or church leadership.

Addressing Your Concern: Immaturity and Control in Ministry

You mentioned a concern about immaturity and controlling behaviors in ministry, particularly in how people misunderstand or misuse headship and submission. It’s true that in some situations, immature leaders—both male and female—may misuse authority, leading to toxic control dynamics. Some may try to impose an unhealthy version of “headship,” demanding that others submit to them in ways that are unbiblical, such as calling out names or acting in a manner that undermines mutual respect and dignity. This kind of behavior reflects Levitical Patriarchal tendencies, which are about control, manipulation, and authoritarianism, rather than the biblical understanding of headship, which is always rooted in service and humility.

The biblical model of headship is not about controlling others or exerting power in unhealthy ways. It is about loving leadership that serves, supports, and encourages others in the faith. We are all under the headship of Christ, and when any Christian leader—male or female—misuses their authority or engages in control tactics, they are out of order and not following the model of Christ’s leadership.

You are correct in your desire to train others to understand the proper boundaries of authority in the Church and in relationships. When people misunderstand or misuse headship, they can create situations where others are hurt, abused, or manipulated. As you work to address these issues, it’s crucial to emphasize the biblical vision of headship, which is always rooted in Christ-like leadership: humble, sacrificial, loving, and empowering.

Conclusion: Clarifying Headship in Relationships

In summary, 1 Corinthians 11:3 does not teach that every Christian man is the head of every Christian woman, in the sense of universal authority over all women. Instead, it refers to specific relational contexts, such as marriage or spiritual oversight in church leadership. The headship in marriage means that the husband is the spiritual leader of his wife, but it is a leadership that mirrors Christ’s sacrificial love, not one of dominance.

For women in leadership positions, it’s essential to understand that headship is not about being subjugated to all men but being under Christ’s authority, and mutually submitting to others in the body of Christ (Ephesians 5:21). This creates a structure where both men and women are called to serve one another and to follow Christ’s example of humility and love.

Our training for others: Emphasize that headship is a servant-leadership model, not a tool for manipulation or control. Teach that submission is mutual and should always be grounded in respect and love for one another in Christ.

TD Asks This Question to Chat GPT

Was Jesus Addressing Ministry Patriarchy? YES.

1. He condemned hierarchical elitism.

The Pharisees were a spiritual “boys’ club” who imposed rules but didn’t follow them (v. 4).
They loved the chief seats, greetings, and titles (v. 6–7), just like authoritarian spiritual leaders today.

2. He promoted servant leadership.

In v. 11, Jesus says, “But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.”
This is opposite of spiritual patriarchy or domineering apostolic control.

3. He denounced gatekeeping and religious abuse.

In v. 13, Jesus accuses them: “Ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men… ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.”
This sounds very much like spiritual leaders who control access, call people “unsubmitted,” or accuse them for not being under a covering — much like modern Levitical Patriarchy.

Making A Point: Jesus vs. the “Ministry Boys’ Club”

Jesus opposed spiritual systems that elevate a few and oppress many. His words in Matthew 23 confront:

Authoritarianism disguised as spiritual authority
Name-dropping, title-obsessed culture
Control-based leadership claiming to represent God
Patriarchal teachings that diminish women, the poor, or the outsider

THE FINAL THOUGHT

So yes — Matthew 23 is one of Jesus’ most direct confrontations of patriarchal spiritual abuse, and it applies powerfully today wherever we see:

Leaders demanding submission without relationship
Ministries that elevate men and suppress women
Systems that gatekeep access to God or ministry
Public spiritual attacks and name-calling from pulpits

Jesus leveled the ground and said, “All ye are brethren.” That includes men, women, married, single, apostle, or layperson — under the Lordship of Christ alone.

Outline and Understanding

Jesus and Paul: Models of Servant Leadership

1. First Church Doctrine on Authority and Ministry

A. Jesus’ Model of Authority

Matthew 20:25–28 (KJV): Jesus warns against lording authority over others. He says, “But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister.”
Jesus models servant authority, never positional or domineering rule—even as the Son of God.

B. Paul and Apostolic Leadership

Ephesians 4:11–13 (KJV): Apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, teachers are gifts for the maturing of the saints—not for control, but equipping.
1 Thessalonians 2:7: Paul says he was “gentle among you, as a nurse cherisheth her children.” His style is relational, gentle, and encouraging.

Big Q: Was Jesus a Patriarch? A First Church Look at Spiritual Authority and Gender

Paul I Corinthians 14:10

“There are many voices in the world and each one has significance”

But, which voice is TRUE?

TAVEAU’S PRO PEOPLE NOTE

I respect the Office Human and am PRO them in general and in life, but NOT Accusation based on False, Misuse of apostolic First Church Leader Bible

Many current Christian voices—some from the normal evangelical LP (mostly feisty, vocal Online Cessationists, (and I am not accusing them or any) but noting false teaching, false authority, …also in many tongue talking even many by the way pentecostal style groups…also several ministry groups who are fundamentalist, NAR ,apostles in the Gates of the City (mostly) and/or the many in the various forms of the Christian shepherding movements subculture, deep hard core, non diverse Christ backgrounds— (though many very intentioned) appear to be untrained and not respectful to all ..These are the main views based upon knowledge, in the Bible, experience after close to 50 years visiting tribes noting repeated use of (over stepping use) of sr office Levitical patriarchal authority structures… as a supposed biblical standard.

But before we assume these traditions reflect God’s order, we must ask: Was Jesus a patriarch? Was Paul promoting male dominance? And what did the First Church actually practice?

Let’s consider the Bible only, with respect for men, women, and God’s original intent—apart from secular feminism or culture wars.

1. Was Jesus a Patriarch?

No. Jesus did not model the cultural patriarchy of His time—He subverted it.

In first-century Jewish and Roman culture, women were often seen as second-class, uneducated, excluded from testimony in court, barred from temple courts, and viewed as property in some legal settings.

Yet Jesus:

Spoke directly to women in public (John 4 – the Samaritan woman, which shocked even His disciples).
Taught women as disciples (Luke 10:38–42 – Mary at His feet).
Defended women against religious judgment (John 8:1–11 – the woman caught in adultery).
Revealed Himself first to women at the Resurrection (John 20:17), giving them apostolic-level commission: “Go to my brethren…”.
Allowed women to financially support His ministry (Luke 8:1–3).

These actions broke deep patriarchal taboos. Jesus honored women as full image-bearers of God and spiritual equals under the Kingdom (Galatians 3:28 KJV). He never taught that men had universal spiritual authority over women.

Jesus challenged male dominance, religious control, and the abuse of spiritual authority — whether over men or women. He modeled servant leadership, not hierarchy for hierarchy’s sake (Mark 10:42–45 KJV).

2. Was Paul a Patriarch?

Let’s separate Paul the Apostle from Saul the Pharisee.

When Paul Was Saul:

Saul was deeply embedded in patriarchal religious culture (Philippians 3:5–6).
He persecuted the early Church (Acts 8:3), which included many Spirit-filled women (Acts 2:17).
His zeal was legalistic, top-down, and male-dominant.

After Paul Met Christ:

Everything changed.

He recognized the Spirit being poured out on “sons and daughters” (Acts 2:17).
He affirmed women leaders like Priscilla, Junia (called an apostle in Romans 16:7), Phoebe (a deacon), and many others.
He taught mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21), not male domination.
He declared that in Christ there is no male nor female (Galatians 3:28), in terms of worth, calling, or inheritance.

But what about 1 Timothy 2:12 and women being silent? (see part 1 and 2 of this series for the history of how Christian church evolution into to hierarchy, the orthodoxy, the patriarchy changed The Christian Woman Thing. AND TD notes: this was the identical time of the Rev 3 Laodicean Church Time Period (“o my”)

Example:

That letter addresses a local church in Ephesus, filled with pagan Diana/Artemis worship, female-dominant cults, and doctrinal chaos. Paul used temporary pastoral correction, not a universal decree. Paul also never silenced Philip’s four prophetic daughters (Acts 21:9), or Priscilla, or others.

Paul, like Jesus, was not a patriarch in the authoritarian sense. He yielded to the Holy Spirit’s gifting, regardless of gender. He affirmed the body of Christ as a spiritual organism, not a rigid chain of command.

Will park my pen here for now. Will return later and ad more..maybe completely revise it all around!
ANY QUESTIONS, feel fully free to ask, but read prior articles first

TO SUPPORT:

Donate with Stripe

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI

Post Views: 51

Discover more from PURPOSE OF THIS MINISTRY AI + I SITE

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.