SECOND GLIMPSE: THE CHRISTIAN DECONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT “MORE INQUIRY ABOUT ETERNAL SALVATION”

SECOND GLIMPSE:

THE CHRISTIAN DECONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT

Is it Core to the Light of the Gospel of Salvation or another Social Justice Movement?

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI

Making a Big Point about WHY Doctrinal Evaluation and Proper Bible teaching needed now:

Apostle Paul Galatians 1:8–9 (KJV)

8 “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.”

9 “As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”

  • “Accursed” (Greek: anathema) means set apart for destruction, cut off from Christ, or under divine judgment.

  • Paul is saying: even if he himself or a supernatural being like an angel teaches something different than the Gospel of Christ, that person is under a curse.

  • This shows how seriously God takes distorting the Gospel—which is the message of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone (see Ephesians 2:8–9).

 

Discernment Checklist: True Gospel vs. Another Gospel

Test/Topic TRUE GOSPEL (Biblical) ANOTHER GOSPEL (False or Distorted)
1. Who is Jesus? Fully God, fully man; Savior, Lord, Messiah (John 1:1,14) Only a moral teacher, activist, symbol, or myth
2. Cross and Resurrection Central to salvation (1 Cor. 15:1–4, Romans 5:8–9) Downplayed, symbolic, or unnecessary
3. Salvation By grace through faith in Christ (Eph. 2:8–9) Earned by works, feelings, identity, or activism
4. Bible Authority God-breathed, final authority (2 Tim. 3:16) Rejected, reinterpreted, or replaced by feelings/culture
5. Sin and Repentance All have sinned; repentance needed (Romans 3:23, Acts 2:38) No sin, or sin redefined; repentance unnecessary
6. Holy Spirit Indwells, convicts, empowers, gives truth (John 16:13) Ignored, replaced by psychology, culture, or emotion
7. Signs, Wonders, Gifts Operate by the Holy Spirit (Acts 2, 1 Cor. 12–14) Denied or viewed as ancient myths
8. Christ-Centered or Structure-Centered All about Jesus and walking with Him All about deconstructing church culture without Jesus
9. Relationship with Christ Intimate, alive, guided by the Spirit (John 10:27) Abstract or detached—no personal Lordship
10. View of Others (Love, Unity) Values all races, genders; unity in Christ (Gal. 3:28) Sometimes bitter, divisive, rejecting biblical community
11. Focus: Spirit or Flesh? Walk in the Spirit (Gal. 5:16–25) Led by wounds, flesh, and offense without healing
12. End Goal Christlikeness, transformation (Romans 12:1–2) Cynicism, spiritual apathy, or activism without Christ

A DISCLAIMER FOR THE DECONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT

Note: Normally,  I am “not into” evangelical leader doctrines, am  mostly charismatic ” prophetic reform” (mainly the worship movements).

But all of this now online concern me..not for “ME, or MY SAKE or any personal need to be PROPER or Superior CORRECT…it is for THESE and the Savior and their Eternal Life, and that of many others.
Please take it as a “respectful submitted Selah” no religious rock throwing or verbal fisticuffs. I’ve had too much of that since the 1980s!

SECTION ONE MERCY AND SCRIPTURE

Dr Taveau asks Chat GPT AI

Q. Does deconstruction follow the classic empathy, compassion, and also soul winning that would make sure people getting to heaven knowing and loving and serving the Lord Jesus Christ as top priority, or is it about being right and the rules and government?

Chat GPT responds:

Short answer:

In most expressions, modern deconstruction does not prioritize soul-winning, eternal salvation, or the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Instead, it often centers on being right, dismantling man-made systems, and emotional justice. While there are exceptions, the core fruit often replaces compassion and Christ-following with critique and cultural relevance.

Let’s break it down:

1. Does Deconstruction Prioritize Classic Empathy & Compassion?

  • Yes—but selectively.
    Many deconstructionists show great empathy for:

    • People hurt by church abuse

    • Marginalized groups (racial, gender, LGBTQ+, etc.)

    • Mental health struggles and trauma

    However, this compassion often:

    • Avoids biblical confrontation about sin

    • Neglects Christ’s call to repentance and spiritual rebirth

    • Favors emotional safety over spiritual truth

Jesus’ compassion always pointed people to salvation, truth, and transformation—not just comfort

2. Does It Emphasize Soul-Winning, Heaven, and the Great Commission?

  • Rarely.
    The classic mission of Jesus (Luke 19:10)—“to seek and save the lost”—is often sidelined.

    In many deconstruction circles:

    • Evangelism is viewed as oppressive

    • Heaven and hell are deconstructed or reinterpreted

    • Jesus is admired, but not worshiped or obeyed

Contrast with Paul and the early Church:
They preached with urgency, power, and compassion for eternal salvation (Acts 2, Romans 10:9–10, 2 Cor. 5:20)

3. Is It More About Being Right and Fixing the Rules?

  • Yes—often.
    Deconstruction frequently focuses on:

    • Critiquing church hierarchy and legalism

    • Exposing injustice, racism, patriarchy, etc.

    • Rewriting theology to fit modern values

    This can become:

    • An intellectual pursuit instead of a spiritual rebirth

    • A power exchange (removing one form of authority to replace with another, often secular or emotional authority)

Key Contrast:

Biblical Christianity (First Church) Modern Deconstruction
Jesus-centered (John 14:6) Trauma or culture-centered
Soul-winning priority (Mark 16:15) Institutional critique priority
Obedience to Christ and Word (John 14:15) Autonomy, lived experience, personal opinion
Grace and truth together (John 1:14) Heavy on grace or justice, often minus truth
Eternal focus (Col. 3:1–2) Temporal, earthly, and psychological focus

First Church Top Priorities

Sister Taveau asks Chat GPT AI:

In light of basic Bible truths and the commandments in Jesus and the emphasis on priorities, what would be the difference in the First Church, Bible, Paul and Jesus and the First Disciples and the Deconstructionists?

How might the many Deconstructionists they get along with all of those? How would they likely handle the Book of Acts Holy Ghost (Acts 2)  Upper Room experience?

Or do you think , based upon their normal style…would they just be finding the flaws, calling them over-emotional? (Or is that the many cessationists, whom these often resemble? Evaluate via the  Or, you know, the general tone and also the Scriptures?

Chat GPT AI replies

The difference between the First Church (as modeled by Paul, Jesus, and the early disciples) and the Deconstructionist movement, in light of basic Bible truths, Jesus’ commandments, and priorities, can be seen in a number of areas including doctrinal focus, church practices, spiritual experiences, and personal relationship with Jesus. Their potential interactions and responses to core practices like the Upper Room experience (Acts 2 and the baptism of the Holy Spirit) would be very different. Let’s break this down:

1. Core Doctrinal Focus:

First Church (Paul, Jesus, and Early Disciples):

  • Central Message: The gospel of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ is the cornerstone. Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection for the forgiveness of sins was the central message, preached by Peter, Paul, and the apostles (Acts 2:36-38, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4).

  • The Commandments of Jesus: Jesus emphasized two main commandments: to love God and to love others (Matthew 22:37-40). These principles were foundational in how the early church lived out their faith.

  • Priority of the Kingdom: Jesus’ teachings and the early church were focused on the coming kingdom of God and being His witnesses to the ends of the earth (Acts 1:8). The missionary mandate was central.

Deconstructionists:

  • Critical of Traditional Doctrine: Deconstruction often stems from a critique of traditional, especially conservative, evangelical theology.

  • Deconstructionists may challenge the clarity of core doctrines like salvation by grace through faith or the authority of Scripture.

  • They may focus on historical context, questioning how certain doctrines evolved or were possibly misinterpreted.

  • Rejection of Rules and Hierarchy: While not all deconstructionists are hostile to doctrine itself, many reject strict church structures, rules, and the control mechanisms they feel are present in some evangelical systems. They may focus more on questioning practices and less on the foundational doctrines that Paul and the early church emphasized.

2. Spiritual Experiences and the Role of the Holy Spirit:

First Church:

  • Pentecost and the Holy Spirit: In Acts 2, the early disciples experience the baptism of the Holy Spirit, leading to the speaking in tongues, prophecy, and other spiritual gifts. This event marks the beginning of the church’s mission, empowered by the Holy Spirit.

    • Speaking in tongues: The Upper Room experience was a central, supernatural encounter with the Holy Spirit that equipped the disciples for ministry. Jesus promised the Holy Spirit as a comforter, guide, and empowerer (John 14:16-17, Acts 1:8). Paul further teaches that the gifts of the Spirit are essential for the church’s growth and edification (1 Corinthians 12).

  • Supernatural Experiences: The early church embraced the miraculous and supernatural as part of their daily life. They expected to see healings, miracles, and signs as evidence of God’s active presence (Acts 2:43, Acts 4:30). The experience of being led by the Spirit was the foundation of their ministry.

Deconstructionists:

  • Critical of Emotionalism: Many deconstructionists are skeptical of charismatic expressions like speaking in tongues, prophetic utterances, and other signs and wonders. They may view these experiences as over-emotional or manipulated by religious leaders to control or impress followers.

    • They might see these practices as excessive, focusing on emotional experiences rather than deep theological study or intellectual clarity. For example, they could view Pentecostal/charismatic experiences as exaggerated, undermining serious biblical teaching.

    • While some deconstructionists may claim to have had such experiences in the past, the focus of their deconstruction is often to decenter those experiences in favor of more rational, intellectual, and social justice-based religious engagement.

3. Relationship with Jesus and the Church:

First Church:

  • Personal Relationship with Jesus: The early church was deeply focused on following Jesus, obeying His teachings, and living out His example. The relationship with Jesus was at the heart of their worship, and the community of believers was marked by unity, prayer, and fellowship (Acts 2:42-47).

    • Soul-winning: The disciples were committed to spreading the gospel so that others could experience salvation and enter into a personal relationship with Christ (Acts 1:8, Matthew 28:19-20).

    • Christ as the Center: In the First Church, Christ’s love and sacrifice were emphasized, with the early Christians being compelled to love others as Christ loved them (John 13:34-35, 1 John 4:9-11). The focus was on both personal relationship with Christ and collective unity as the body of believers.

Deconstructionists:

  • Relational but Critical: Deconstructionists may claim to still have a relationship with Jesus, but their view of Him is often filtered through a critical lens. They may focus more on discerning truth through personal reflection or community rather than submitting to traditional church structures.

    • The personal relationship with Christ in deconstruction is often seen through the lens of personal freedom and self-discovery, and less through the lens of obedience to the Great Commission or the pursuit of holiness.

    • Soul-winning and Conversion: Deconstructionists are less likely to emphasize traditional evangelism or conversion as priorities. Instead, the focus tends to shift toward social justice, deconstructing harmful theologies, and healing from religious trauma, rather than actively seeking to spread the gospel for salvation.

4. Handling the Book of Acts Upper Room Experience:

First Church:

  • The Upper Room experience (Acts 2) was a foundational moment for the early church. The Holy Spirit’s outpouring was seen as a necessity for the empowerment of believers to witness to the world and live out their faith.

    • Embracing the Supernatural: The early church did not shy away from the supernatural elements of this experience. The tongues, the prophecy, and the boldness in preaching were signs of God’s power at work in His people.

Deconstructionists:

  • Skeptical Response: Deconstructionists would likely be skeptical of the Upper Room experience, especially if it involved speaking in tongues or supernatural manifestations.

  • They would likely critique it as over-emotional or manipulated. They may see the emphasis on the Holy Spirit’s power as problematic if it leads to excessive emotionalism or focus on outward experiences.

    • Intellectualizing the Spirit: Deconstructionists might seek a more rational, intellectual engagement with faith, focusing on what the Spirit’s empowerment means intellectually or symbolically, rather than experientially.

5. Tone and Scriptures:

  • First Church: The tone of the First Church was one of unity, empowered by the Spirit, with a strong commitment to holiness, love, and obedience to Christ. Scriptures like John 14:12 (“Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these…”) and Acts 1:8 (the Holy Spirit empowering them to be witnesses) were central to their mission.

  • Deconstructionists: The tone tends to be more critical, often focusing on rejection of outdated traditions, structures, or teachings they find harmful or oppressive.

  • They may focus on justice, inclusivity, and deconstructing harmful theological practices, rather than traditional evangelism or spiritual experiences.

  • Mega Point: Scriptures used by deconstructionists are often reinterpreted through a critical lens, questioning traditional understandings of authority, salvation, and church practices.

MORE DECONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT BELIEFS

Comparison with Bible, Paul, First Church, Messiah Jesus

Taveau asks Chat to expound more on the beliefs of the Deconstruction Movement (not knowing much about it) Meaning: That this is not correcting or condoning or pro or against .this is.just myself getting objective views:

Chat GPT Says:

The deconstruction movement, particularly within modern Christianity, refers to the process by which individuals critically examine and often dismantle the religious beliefs, systems, and traditions they were taught—sometimes resulting in leaving organized religion entirely, and sometimes in rebuilding a more personal, simplified faith. It’s often sparked by disillusionment with hypocrisy, abuse, racism, legalism, or shallow teachings in church structures.

1. Deconstruction vs. the Bible and the First Church (New Testament, Jesus, Paul, Acts)

Jesus Christ’s Model

Jesus didn’t come to reinforce rigid religious systems. He often deconstructed the oppressive religious norms of the Pharisees, saying, “You nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition” (Matthew 15:6).

He exposed fake righteousness and invited people into real relationship, healing, and grace. His focus was not on the law for law’s sake, but on mercy, justice, humility, and love.

Taveau asks Chat GPT

Why did the Creator Father send His Son, Jesus into the world? (give Scriptures)

Chat GPT replies:

 1. To Save the World Through Him

John 3:16–17
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world;
but that the world through him might be saved.”

 2. To Destroy Sin and Death

1 John 3:8
“…For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.”

Hebrews 2:14–15
“…that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;
And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.”

 3. To Bring Us to God

1 Peter 3:18
“For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust,
that he might bring us to God…”

 4. To Reveal the Father

John 14:9
“He that hath seen me hath seen the Father…”

John 1:18
“No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father,
he hath declared him.”

 5. To Give Eternal Life

John 6:40
“And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son,
and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.”

 6. To Fulfill the Law and the Prophets

Matthew 5:17
“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets:
I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.”

 Summary:

God the Father sent His Son to fulfill His eternal plan of redemption:
to demonstrate love, defeat sin, reveal His nature, and restore relationship with His creation.

TD asks Chat GPT
Need to clarify:  According to the Bible, First Church: what was Christ’s primary call on the earth? Give many Scriptures
 
Chat GPT replies:

Christ’s primary call on the earth was to reconcile humanity to God by becoming the Savior of the world—to seek and save the lost, to preach the Kingdom of God, and to lay down His life as a ransom for our sins.

 Key Scriptures (KJV):

1. To Save the Lost

Luke 19:10
“For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.”

2. To Preach the Kingdom of God

Luke 4:43
“I must preach the kingdom of God to other cities also: for therefore am I sent.”

3. To Call Sinners to Repentance

Mark 2:17
“They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”

4. To Give His Life for Many

Mark 10:45
“For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.

5. To Do the Will of the Father

John 6:38–40
“For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me… And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life.”

6. To Destroy the Works of the Devil

1 John 3:8
“For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.”

 Summary:

Jesus came to redeem, restore, and reconcile.
He fulfilled prophecy, preached the Kingdom, died for our sins, rose again, and offered the gift of eternal life—so we could walk in truth, freedom, and fellowship with God.

The Book of Acts / First Church

The early church in Acts was organic, Spirit-led, communal, and focused on unity, fellowship, prayer, and apostolic doctrine (Acts 2:42-47). They had no mega-systems, no polished branding, and no coercive “submit-or-else” doctrines. They also weren’t perfect—issues like hypocrisy (Ananias and Sapphira), racism (Acts 6), and doctrinal disputes (Acts 15) arose, but the responses were always relational and Spirit-led.

Apostle Paul’s Letters

Paul, while defending truth and doctrine, repeatedly emphasized that knowledge without love puffs up (1 Corinthians 8:1). He warned against legalism (Galatians), spiritual pride (Corinthians), and false authority. Paul himself had to deconstruct Pharisee traditions to follow Christ (Philippians 3:7-9). His goal was to build people up in grace, Christlike character, and faithful endurance, not in power hierarchies.

2. Deconstruction Today

  • Many today are reacting against institutionalism, authoritarianism, culture wars, or prosperity-driven ministry models.

  • Sadly, the modern American church (in some expressions) is more known for celebrity, platforms, money, and control, rather than the raw, heartfelt relationship with Jesus Christ.

  • Some churches monetize deliverance, prophecy, or even access to leaders—treating the faith like a business rather than a holy calling.

3. Relationship with Jesus Christ: Where Did It Go? (Sister Taveau desires to know)

That’s the big question:
Where is the First Love (Revelation 2:4)?
Where is the “Abba Father” intimacy?
Where is the compassion, the servant leadership, the daily cross, and the joy of the Lord?

Jesus came to bring reconciliation and personal relationship—not to create spiritual CEOs or platforms for merchandising the anointing.

Taveau asks
. Does the deconstruction movement believe in a personal relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ?
the moving of the Holy Spirit in the Book of Acts?

Do they believe in signs and wonders?

Do they believe in the inward witness of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, John 16, 13, that will give them supernatural wisdom and revelation, as well as Ephesians 1, 17?

Or do they just talk about the structure? Is it about Christ or structure?

Men and women, how are women and races treated in deconstruction?

Who started the Deconstruction Movement?

Chat GPT answers:

1. Does the Deconstruction Movement Believe in a Personal Relationship with Jesus Christ?

Answer: It depends.

Many within the movement still deeply love Jesus and are searching for a pure, authentic relationship with Him—stripped of human traditions and toxicity. They often reject manipulation, church politics, celebrity pastors, racial inequality, gender oppression, or abuse hidden under spiritual coverings.
However, others fall into progressive Christian theology, where Christ becomes symbolic, and the gospel becomes more about social activism than salvation and the cross.

Key Division:

  • Some still follow Jesus and want deep, Spirit-filled relationship.

  • Others drift toward universalism, mysticism, or leave Christian orthodoxy entirely.

2. Do They Believe in the Holy Spirit Like in the Book of Acts? (Moving, Signs, Wonders, Inward Witness, Spirit of Truth)

This is where major divergence happens.

Some deconstructionists:

  • Grew up in charismatic, Pentecostal, or prophetic movements that were abusive, overhyped, or theatrical.

  • They may reject all signs, wonders, speaking in tongues, and supernatural power—believing it was misused or faked.

  • The Holy Spirit is often redefined as a vague sense of “inner peace” or progressive conscience rather than a living, empowering Person of the Trinity who speaks, warns, directs, and performs miracles.

Others:

  • Long for authentic Spirit power free from performance or ego.

  • Still believe in the gifts, prophecy, and signs, but want them rooted in love, Scripture, and accountability.

Key Scripture Disconnection:
Many no longer teach or affirm John 16:13 (Spirit of Truth guiding into all truth), or Ephesians 1:17 (Spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him). These core truths may be seen as symbolic or optional, not central.

3. Is It About Christ—or Just Structure?

Too often, it’s about structure.

Deconstructionists primarily target:

  • Church abuse

  • Power imbalance

  • Religious legalism

  • Colonialism or patriarchy

But many never rebuild, or only rebuild horizontally (community) without vertical devotion (relationship with Jesus).

That said, some do reconstruct their faith around:

  • Christ alone

  • The simplicity of the gospel

  • Authentic living

  • The Sermon on the Mount lifestyle

Main issue: They tear down “bad systems,” but sometimes forget to rebuild on the solid rock of Christ (Matthew 7:24).

4. What About Women and Races in the Deconstruction Movement?

This is where the movement often shines.

Positives:

  • Strong affirmation of women in ministry, leadership, teaching, and prophetic roles.

  • Bold pushback against racism, colonialism, or Eurocentric Christianity.

  • Reclaiming voices of Black, Brown, Indigenous, and Asian believers.

  • Defending people marginalized by churches: single mothers, trauma survivors, and those harmed by church systems.

This aligns more closely with Galatians 3:28 and Acts 2:17-18 where “your sons and daughters shall prophesy.”

Concerns:

  • In affirming justice, some reject God’s order, biblical leadership, or Christ’s headship.

  • May affirm culture’s views over biblical discernment—mistaking biblical correction for patriarchy or oppression.

5. Who Started The Deconstruction Movement?

There’s no single founder—but the movement grew as a grassroots reaction.

Early Influences:

  • Post-Evangelical thought leaders like Rachel Held Evans, Rob Bell, and later podcasts like The Liturgists and The Bible for Normal People.

  • Fueled by social media, YouTube exposés, celebrity pastor scandals, racial injustice in the church, purity culture backlash, and megachurch burnout.

It was a reaction—not a reformation led by one theological voice. Many began deconstructing when they saw hypocrisy, control, racism, or greed masked as “God’s will.”

Comparison Chart:

Topic Deconstruction Movement Book of Acts Church / First Church
Jesus Focus Varies: symbolic to deeply relational Central Person, Savior, Lord
Holy Spirit Often redefined or minimized Active, personal, supernatural
Signs & Wonders Often rejected or mistrusted Normal & expected (Acts 2, 4, 5)
Structure Often dismantled completely Flexible, Spirit-led, servant-based
Women in Ministry Strongly affirmed Affirmed (Acts 2:18, Romans 16)
Racial Equality Advocated passionately Modeled (Acts 10, Gal 3:28)
Bible Authority Selective or reinterpreted Core source of doctrine & life
Cross / Salvation Sometimes secondary Central to all teaching (Acts 4:12)

4. Money, Image, and Today’s Church Culture

  • Money has become a stumbling block—what once was a simple call to “take no purse” (Luke 10:4) is now often a marketing-driven machine.

  • Image management and brand-building often take priority over repentance, honesty, and real connection with people.

  • The gospel risks being diluted into self-help or motivational content, devoid of the cross, sacrifice, and real resurrection power.

5. So, Is Deconstruction Always Wrong?

Not necessarily. Jesus Himself “deconstructed” temple traditions to bring real faith. The difference is:

  • Holy Spirit-led deconstruction brings people closer to Jesus.

  • Worldly deconstruction often leads to cynicism, atheism, or spiritual disconnection.

Final Reflection Question:

Taveau asks: Where is “A Relationship With God through His Son, Christ?”

1.Where is the “relationship” model for those who acknowledge the saving work of Christ

2. What about His shed blood and the oil of joy and gladness, and spreading the Good News? healing the sick, serving the poor? The Pauline diverse “community” which transforms society (Read Ephesians 4)

2. Where is the joy in walking with Christ daily, apart from the people, the merchandizing and religious, business, life systems?

Taveau asks Chat GPT to expound:
Does Deconstruction Teach a Different Gospel?

Chat GPT Replies

A Short Answer:

**Much of it does—**but not always intentionally. It depends on the fruit and the end result of the deconstruction journey.

Biblical Warning:

Galatians 1:6–9 (KJV):

“I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ…
If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

This passage sets a clear plumbline: there is one gospel—Jesus Christ, crucified, risen, and the only way to salvation (John 14:6, Acts 4:12).

When Deconstruction Becomes “Another Gospel”

1. When it replaces Jesus with social justice.

  • Fighting injustice is biblical (Micah 6:8, James 1:27),
    but when Jesus becomes a symbol of activism rather than Lord and Savior,
    it crosses the line into a gospel of works, not grace.

2. When it denies sin and the need for repentance.

  • If everyone is “already accepted” without the need for salvation, repentance, or the cross,
    it becomes universalism or moralism—not the gospel.

3. When it removes the authority of Scripture.

  • The true gospel is rooted in the Word of God.
    If Scripture is rewritten, reinterpreted through culture, or picked apart to fit preference,
    it is no longer the faith once delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3).

4. When it minimizes or rejects the cross.

  • Without the atonement, the blood of Jesus, and the resurrection,
    we are left with a Christless Christianity—a form of godliness but denying the power (2 Timothy 3:5).

Q. What Isn’t Automatically “Another Gospel”

Not everyone who is deconstructing is preaching another gospel. Some are:

  • Trying to remove toxic culture but keep Christ.

  • Seeking truth and healing from trauma without rejecting Jesus.

  • Re-evaluating manmade systems, not God’s Word.

If they are still:

  • Preaching Jesus crucified and risen,

  • Honoring the Word of God,

  • Preaching salvation by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9),

  • And following the Spirit of Truth (John 16:13),

…then they are likely not preaching “another gospel”—just trying to unlearn false additions.

The Fruit Test – Matthew 7:15–20

“By their fruits ye shall know them.”

Ask:

  • Does their message lead to repentance and a changed life?

  • Does it exalt Jesus Christ as Lord or human insight?

  • Does it draw people to love, obey, and follow Christ, or to question, doubt, and drift?

Conclusion:

Yes, many branches of the deconstruction movement result in preaching another gospel—whether through erasing Scripture, replacing Jesus with justice, or redefining salvation.

However, some are reforming—returning to Jesus, the cross, the Word, and the Spirit—and seeking a pure gospel without tradition, ego, or abuse.

FIRST CHURCH, JESUS, PAUL AND HOLY GHOST VS MANY DECONSTRUCTIONISTS

TD asks Chat GPT (based on logic, comments, history and beliefs of the Deconstruction Movement)


Q. How Might the 
Deconstructionists “Get Along (Regard The Others) in Christian, which included the Book of Acts move, in the area Community” (meaning”Get Along)?

Chat GPT AI replies

It’s unlikely that the First Church and deconstructionists would get along in a traditional sense. While there may be common ground on issues like social justice or spiritual healing, the foundational priorities differ greatly. The First Church was focused on spreading the gospel and living in the power of the Holy Spirit, while deconstructionists often critique or reject these supernatural elements, instead prioritizing social justice and intellectual critique.

In summary, the First Church was deeply rooted in the experience of the Holy Spirit, the doctrines of salvation, and Christ’s commandments to love and witness, while deconstruction tends to focus more on questioning and reinterpreting established norms, often away from supernatural encounters.

Deconstruction Movement Priority

TD asks
What are the top priorities in the Deconstruction Movement?

Chat GPT AI says:

For many in the deconstruction movement, the top priority is often focused more on social justice, ethical behavior, and deconstructing harmful systems rather than the traditional evangelistic message of salvation through Christ.

  1. Social Justice and Ethical Transformation: Deconstructionists tend to emphasize righting wrongs in society, such as addressing racism, gender inequality, and economic disparity. The priority is often on creating a just world rather than saving souls or spreading the gospel.

  2. Deconstructing Religious Systems: One of the main goals of deconstruction is to critique or reject traditional church practices, doctrines, and authority structures. This involves challenging the doctrines of original sin, salvation by grace, biblical inerrancy, and church hierarchy, among others.

  3. Questioning the Supernatural and Divine Authority: Deconstructionists are less likely to prioritize spiritual empowerment, the working of the Holy Spirit, and signs and wonders. Instead, they may focus more on logic, ethics, and individual experience.

  4. Focus on Community and Inclusivity: The relationship with Jesus might take a backseat to more inclusivity and community engagement. Deconstructionists may focus on inclusive spirituality, which may not necessarily be centered around a personal relationship with Jesus or a call to repentance and faith.

Checklist: Summary Comparison of Priorities:

First Church (Paul, Jesus, Disciples) Deconstruction Movement
Top Priority: Salvation through Jesus Christ Top Priority: Social justice, ethics, inclusivity
Focus on spreading the gospel (Great Commission) Focus on questioning traditional theology
Emphasis on personal relationship with Jesus (eternal life) Emphasis on deconstructing harmful religious systems
Empowered by the Holy Spirit, signs and wonders Focus on ethics, personal reflection, and community
Eternal life through faith in Christ as central Salvation may be less emphasized, often replaced with universalism

TD asks Chat GPT Please tell

THE TALE OF TWO SETS OF TOP PRIORITIES
First Church and Deconstruction Ministry Movement

Chat GPT replies

  • In light of eternal salvation and the top priority of the First Church versus the Deconstruction movement, we see a clear contrast.
  • The First Church’s priority was always salvation through Jesus Christ, personal repentance, and empowerment through the Holy Spirit to carry out the Great Commission.
  • In contrast, the Deconstruction movement often prioritizes social justice, ethical questions, and questioning theological structures,
  • sometimes at the expense of a clear call to salvation and personal relationship with Christ.
  • While some in the deconstruction movement may still claim Christianity or identify as followers of Jesus,
  • the biblical framework of salvation and eternal life through faith in Christ is often downplayed or redefined in more inclusive or universal terms.
  • Consequently, there could be a gap in understanding the true message of salvation as presented in Scripture.
  • The First Church would likely emphasize that salvation is the ultimate priority (John 14:6, Romans 10:9-10) and that the gospel should remain central,
  • while deconstructionists may find that the gospel is often secondary to their broader focus on social change and religious reform.

 MAKING ETERNAL MAIN POINTS
Taveau asks
:

Does the Deconstruction  Movement   believe that Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven, that nobody goes to the Father, that he was raised from the dead?

Chat GPT answers:

KEY POINT:

The bottom line regarding the Deconstruction Movement and their belief about Jesus Christ as the only way to heaven is mixed and depends largely on the individuals involved and their specific journey of deconstruction.

Here’s a general overview:

Deconstructionists’ View on Jesus and Salvation:

  • Many Deconstructionists no longer adhere to the traditional evangelical teaching that Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven (John 14:6) and that salvation is through faith in Him alone (Acts 4:12). As they deconstruct, they often question or reject the exclusivity of this belief, which has traditionally been central to evangelical Christianity.

  • Some may still affirm Jesus as a spiritual figure or moral teacher, but may not hold to the doctrine that only Jesus can save or that faith in Jesus is the only means to eternal life.

  • MEGA POINT: Instead, some might lean toward a universalistic perspective, believing that salvation could be available to people of different faiths or even those without faith in Christ.

  • Others in the movement may still hold onto a belief in Christ but are uncertain or critical of the traditional doctrines of salvation, particularly as it pertains to eternal exclusivity.

  • They might prefer to emphasize love, compassion, and social justice over traditional doctrinal statements about sin, repentance, and the need for conversion.

The Resurrection of Jesus:

  • The resurrection of Jesus (Romans 10:9) may be viewed differently by those who deconstruct. Some might still affirm the historical resurrection but reinterpret its significance, emphasizing symbolic or ethical meanings over a literal, physical resurrection.

  • For others, the resurrection might not be central to their faith journey anymore. It may be seen as a metaphor or a symbolic story rather than an essential doctrinal truth that underpins Christian salvation.

BIG CLARIFYING POINT

In short, the Deconstruction Movement as a whole does not consistently affirm that Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven in the way that traditional Christianity teaches.

Many deconstructors move away from this exclusive claim, sometimes viewing it as narrow or problematic, and redefine salvation in more inclusive or universal terms.

They may still acknowledge Jesus in some form, but the traditional Christian doctrine of Jesus as the only way to the Father and the resurrection as central to salvation is often questioned or reinterpreted.

Thus, it’s clear that many deconstructionistsdo not hold to the core biblical teaching that salvation comes only through faith in Jesus Christ (John 14:6, Acts 4:12), and they often downplay or reinterpret the role of Jesus and the resurrection in the context of eternal life.

In contrast, the First Church (as described in Acts and taught by Jesus and Paul) centered its message on:

  1. Salvation through Jesus Christ alone (John 14:6, Acts 4:12).

  2. The authority and inerrancy of Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16).

  3. The importance of personal repentance and faith in Christ (Mark 1:15, Acts 2:38).

  4. The call to preach the gospel and make disciples of all nations (Matthew 28:19-20).

  5. The unity of the Church, with sound doctrine as the foundation (Ephesians 4:4-6).

The movements mentioned above, while potentially addressing issues of justice, inclusivity, or personal spiritual growth, often diverge from the First Church’s focus on the clarity of the gospel message and its exclusive nature for salvation.


MORE DOCTRINES: EACH OF WHICH RESEMBLE DECONSTRUCTION:

Pastor Taveau states: “I am not an expert on the groups which follows. I know mostly about the spirit filled ones, as I have experienced noticeable warfare from false “subliminal teaching” and errant glorified practices. This is around the United States, maybe Europe and more..however, I will simply ask Chat GPT Ai about them and let is declare, however, anyone knows more about these it is on your shoulders to reprove or agree.
I am not going to debate on anything (note my policies above on the home page) NO DEBATE POLICY

Taveau’s Chat GPT AI

Please  mention other modern Christian doctrine groups which bear resemblance to Deconstruction:

Chat GPT AI replies
There are several other movements or sub-cultures within contemporary Christianity that share similarities with the Deconstruction and Emergent Church movements. These movements tend to be critical of traditional evangelicalism and often challenge traditional doctrines, church structures, and religious practices. Below are a few other movements that may be seen as related or similar in tone, approach, and/or criticism:

1. The Emergent Church

The Emergent Church (often associated with the broader Emerging Church movement) arose in the late 1990s and early 2000s as a response to the challenges posed by postmodern culture to traditional Christian structures and beliefs.

Taveaus says:
Please compare The Emergent Church beliefs with First Church, Jesus, Paul, Bible:

Chat GPT says:

 Emergent Church Founders vs. First Church (Jesus, Paul, the Bible)

Here is a clear comparison chart between the Emergent Church founders’ beliefs and the First Church teachings (Jesus, Paul, and the New Testament) based on core Christian doctrines and biblical practices.

Topic Emergent Church Founders<br>(e.g., Brian McLaren, Tony Jones, Doug Pagitt) First Church (New Testament)<br>(Jesus, Paul, Apostles) Scripture References (KJV)
Authority of Scripture Often questioned inerrancy; viewed the Bible as narrative, open to reinterpretation Held the Scriptures as divinely inspired, authoritative, and final 2 Timothy 3:16, Galatians 1:11–12
Jesus as the Only Way Some leaders questioned exclusivity of Christ for salvation Jesus is the only way to the Father John 14:6, Acts 4:12
Salvation Often focused on social justice and community transformation more than personal repentance and faith in Christ Emphasized repentance, faith in Jesus, grace—not works—for salvation Ephesians 2:8–9, Romans 10:9–10
Sin and Judgment Downplayed sin, judgment, and hell as offensive in postmodern culture Taught the reality of sin, need for repentance, coming judgment Romans 3:23, Romans 6:23, Acts 17:30–31
The Gospel Message Reimagined the gospel to include cultural activism, societal reform Preached Christ crucified, risen, and returning; salvation by grace 1 Corinthians 15:1–4, Galatians 1:6–9
View of Truth Influenced by postmodernism—truth seen as relative or personal Truth is absolute and revealed by God through Christ and Scripture John 17:17, John 8:32
Church Structure Favored decentralized, informal gatherings; skeptical of tradition Appointed elders, taught order in worship and leadership accountability Titus 1:5, 1 Corinthians 14:40
Mission Focused on cultural relevance, environmental and social causes Preached repentance and forgiveness through Jesus to all nations Matthew 28:19–20, Acts 1:8
Inclusivity Emphasized radical inclusion—even at the expense of doctrinal clarity Welcomed all but called for repentance and transformation Luke 5:32, 1 Corinthians 6:9–11
Heaven & Hell Some founders questioned or redefined eternal judgment Clear teaching of eternal life and eternal punishment Matthew 25:46, Revelation 20:11–15

 Origins and Key Figures

  • Founding Context: The Emergent Church began as a network of young evangelical leaders seeking to engage with postmodern society in new ways.

  • Key Figures: Influential leaders include Brian McLaren, Tony Jones, Doug Pagitt, and Dan Kimball. These individuals were instrumental in shaping the movement’s theology and practices.

  • Organizational Structure: The movement is characterized by its decentralized nature, lacking a formal hierarchy or unified doctrine. Instead, it emphasizes a “conversation” among diverse voices.

Core Beliefs and Practices

  • Postmodern Engagement: The Emergent Church seeks to engage with postmodern culture by rethinking traditional doctrines and practices to make them more relevant and accessible.

  • Narrative Theology: Emphasizes storytelling and personal experience over systematic theology, focusing on the overarching narrative of Scripture.

  • Community and Inclusivity: Prioritizes authentic community, inclusivity, and social justice, often embracing diverse perspectives and backgrounds.

  • Missional Focus: Encourages believers to live out their faith actively in society, emphasizing service and cultural engagement.

 Comparison with the Deconstruction Movement

Aspect Emergent Church Deconstruction Movement
Origin Response to postmodernism in the late 1990s Individual reassessment of faith traditions
Structure Decentralized, community-focused Personal, often solitary journey
Approach to Doctrine Reimagining traditional beliefs Questioning and often rejecting established doctrines
Goal Cultural relevance and community engagement Authentic personal faith or departure from faith
Relation to Church Reforming church practices Often distancing from institutional church

2.. Progressive Christianity

Overview

Progressive Christianity is often considered an evolution or a natural outgrowth of the Emergent Church and shares common themes with deconstruction, including a shift away from traditional doctrines and an embrace of cultural relevance. Progressive Christians typically emphasize the reinterpretation of traditional Christian beliefs in light of modern social, cultural, and scientific understandings.

Core Beliefs and Practices

  • Social Justice Focus: Progressive Christians often prioritize issues like racial justice, environmentalism, economic equality, and gender inclusivity. They tend to stress the importance of love and justice as the guiding principles of faith.

  • Reinterpreting Biblical Truth: Like the Emergent Church, Progressive Christianity frequently revisits traditional theological concepts, questioning the literal interpretation of the Bible and leaning towards symbolic or metaphorical readings.

  • Inclusivity: Progressive Christians embrace a more inclusive stance on issues such as LGBTQ+ rights, viewing these as central to a faith that embraces all people, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.

  • Uncertainty About the Exclusivity of Christ: A common feature of Progressive Christianity is the questioning of whether Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation, with some embracing a universalist or pluralist view of salvation.

Key Differences from the First Church

The First Church, as described in Acts, maintained a strong emphasis on the exclusive gospel of salvation through Jesus Christ (John 14:6, Acts 4:12), the inerrancy of Scripture, and the importance of personal holiness. Progressive Christianity often moves away from these foundational truths and instead highlights social transformation as the highest calling.

2. New Apostolic Reformation (NAR)

Overview

The New Apostolic Reformation is a controversial, modern movement within Pentecostal and charismatic Christianity that aims to restore the apostolic ministry and prophetic leadership in the church. While the NAR differs significantly in doctrine from movements like Deconstruction or Progressive Christianity, it is often seen as another modern attempt to reshape or reimagine church structure and authority.

Core Beliefs and Practices

  • Restoration of Apostles and Prophets: The NAR believes that God is restoring the role of apostles and prophets to the church, as described in Ephesians 4:11. These apostles and prophets are seen as authority figures who receive direct revelations from God and guide the church.

  • Dominion Theology: The movement holds that Christians are called to take dominion over the world and society, ushering in God’s kingdom through influence in politics, culture, and various spheres of life.

  • Signs and Wonders: A hallmark of NAR churches is a strong emphasis on supernatural manifestations such as healing, prophecy, and speaking in tongues.

Key Differences from the First Church

While the First Church in Acts focused on the foundational apostles’ teachings (Acts 2:42) and centered around the gospel of salvation and church unity, the NAR often focuses on building new, powerful, charismatic leadership structures and prioritizes experiential elements such as prophecy and signs. Furthermore, their theology of dominion does not seem to align with the humble, servant leadership model exemplified by Jesus and the early church.**

**My Worst Nightmare (a patrichian” patriarchy’ in many Holy Spirit dynasty type ministries) THE COLONIAL DEMON CONSCIOUS WELP this the doctrinal subculture which I have the many occult, control, false witness, subliminal “mind reading” never speaking , control, even totalitarianism turf protecting, and major cult “jumping persons in public” and aggressive, often misogyinist, biased, triggered, targeting, seem to pray against ALL MAJOR REAL DEMONIC CHARACTER ISSUES  with, since 1990’s (“apostles in the gates of the city, shepherding movement, occult use of Spectral “white witchcraft’ far off occult ‘divining” (reading our thirst) which is use of false controlling, authority (I Samuel 15:23  witchcraft ) which was in the Salem Witch trials are similar to THIS or the same)

3. Progressive Pentecostalism

Overview

Similar to Progressive Christianity, Progressive Pentecostalism is a newer movement within the Pentecostal and charismatic churches that focuses on reinterpreting Pentecostal traditions in a more culturally relevant way, especially when it comes to issues like social justice, gender equality, and race relations. It seeks to hold on to Pentecostal experiences like speaking in tongues and healing while adapting the movement to contemporary cultural values.

Core Beliefs and Practices

  • Social Justice and Activism: Progressive Pentecostalism is heavily involved in advocating for social justice issues, such as racial reconciliation, gender equality, and LGBTQ+ inclusion, which aligns it with the Progressive Christian movement.

  • Spiritual Gifts: While the movement critiques certain aspects of traditional Pentecostalism, it still holds strongly to the importance of spiritual gifts like speaking in tongues, healing, and prophecy.

  • Inclusive Theology: This movement tends to have a more inclusive approach towards people of different sexual orientations and beliefs, sometimes moving toward universalism or at least affirming LGBTQ+ Christians in leadership.

Key Differences from the First Church

Like Progressive Christianity, Progressive Pentecostalism softens the exclusivity of the gospel of Christ by allowing more flexibility in theological beliefs and practices. The First Church, however, maintained a commitment to salvation through Jesus alone and clear doctrinal boundaries (Acts 4:12, John 14:6).

4. Christian Universalism

Overview

Christian Universalism is another emerging theological movement that believes in the eventual salvation of all people. While it maintains a belief in Jesus Christ as the savior, Christian Universalists reject the idea of eternal damnation and hell and instead believe that all people will eventually be reconciled to God, regardless of their beliefs during their earthly lives.

Core Beliefs and Practices

  • Universal Salvation: Christian Universalists believe that all people will ultimately be saved, regardless of their response to the gospel during their lifetime. They see Jesus Christ as the savior of all, including those who do not explicitly accept Him during their time on earth.

  • Theological Inclusivity: Like the Emergent Church and Progressive Christianity, Christian Universalism emphasizes tolerance, compassion, and reconciliation as core tenets of the faith.

  • Rejection of Eternal Punishment: Christian Universalists reject the idea of eternal punishment or hell for those who do not accept Christ during their earthly lives.

Key Differences from the First Church

The First Church emphasized the necessity of faith in Jesus Christ as the means of salvation and the reality of eternal punishment for those who reject the gospel (John 3:16-18, Revelation 20:15). Christian Universalism’s universal reconciliation view directly contradicts the traditional biblical teaching that faith in Jesus is the only way to be saved.

Conclusion

While the Deconstruction and Emergent Church movements represent two of the most prominent critiques of traditional evangelicalism, several other movements, like Progressive Christianity, Progressive Pentecostalism, the New Apostolic Reformation, and Christian Universalism, share similar critiques or shifts in understanding doctrine. These movements often challenge long-established doctrines, like the exclusivity of Christ, biblical authority, and eternal damnation, with an emphasis on social justice and inclusivity.

Apostolic Taveau

MAKES THIS POINT
As these movements emerge, it becomes crucial for believers to remain anchored in biblical truth—especially the foundational truths of salvation through Christ alone, the authority of Scripture, and the need for repentance and faith in Jesus as the only way to eternal life. Without a return to these central teachings, there is a danger that these movements will lead people away from the true gospel of Christ.

Sister Taveau asks:

In each of these three movements, make a list where they digress off the First Church Gospel of Christ. Make a list by every one of each group you mentioned where they digress from First Church Jesus and Paul. Make a chart.

Chat GPT Responds

Here’s a comparison chart that outlines the ways in which the three movements—Deconstructionism, Emergent Church, and Progressive Christianity—digress from the First Church Gospel of Christ as taught by Jesus and Paul:

Movement Digressions from the First Church Gospel of Christ
Deconstructionism 1. Questioning or rejecting the authority of Scripture: Deconstructionists often view the Bible through a lens of cultural relativism or as a historical document, questioning its inerrancy and timeless truth.
2. Universalism/Pluralism: Some deconstructionists adopt a pluralistic approach to salvation, implying that Jesus may not be the only way to heaven (John 14:6, Acts 4:12).
3. Rejection of traditional doctrine: They may reject doctrines like original sin, penal substitutionary atonement, or the exclusivity of the gospel, which were central to the First Church’s message.
4. Emphasis on social justice over salvation: Deconstructionists tend to focus on social transformation and activism, sometimes elevating these over the necessity of personal salvation and a relationship with Christ.
5. Individual subjective spirituality: The focus on the inner journey and personal experience can diminish the emphasis on the objective gospel and the centrality of Christ’s death and resurrection as the only means of salvation.
Emergent Church 1. Reinterpretation of salvation: Emergent Church proponents often downplay the exclusivity of Christ as the way to salvation, leaning toward a more universalist or pluralistic view (e.g., belief that there are other paths to salvation).
2. Rejection of Biblical inerrancy: The Emergent Church tends to reject the literal or inerrant interpretation of Scripture, viewing it as a cultural artifact rather than the authoritative Word of God (2 Timothy 3:16).
3. Emphasis on experience over doctrine: There is often more focus on personal experiences and feelings over solid, biblical teachings, leading to an experience-driven faith rather than a doctrine-driven one.
4. De-emphasis on hell and judgment: The Emergent Church often downplays or reinterprets the doctrine of hell and eternal punishment, which was central in the preaching of Jesus and Paul (Mark 9:43-48, Revelation 20:15).
5. Open-ended theology: The Emergent movement allows for unresolved theological tensions, focusing on open-ended questions rather than definitive answers. This contrasts with the First Church’s call to a clear, foundational faith (1 Corinthians 15:3-4).
Progressive Christianity 1. Universalist views of salvation: Progressive Christians often adopt a universalist or inclusivist stance, suggesting that people who do not explicitly accept Christ may still be saved. This contradicts the First Church’s emphasis on faith in Jesus Christ alone (John 14:6, Acts 4:12).
2. Social justice over personal salvation: Progressive Christians may prioritize social justice and cultural change over the centrality of personal repentance and faith in Christ for salvation (Matthew 28:19-20).
3. Rejection of traditional views on sin and atonement: Progressive Christians tend to downplay or redefine doctrines like original sin and the atonement, which were key to the First Church’s message (Romans 3:25-26, Romans 5:12-21).
4. Liberal reinterpretation of Scripture: Many within Progressive Christianity reject a literal interpretation of Scripture and emphasize a liberal, contextual, or metaphorical approach, reducing the authority and clarity of biblical teachings (2 Timothy 3:16).
5. Emphasis on inclusivity: While the First Church was inclusive in welcoming all people to salvation, it still maintained doctrinal boundaries that required adherence to faith in Christ (Acts 2:38, Galatians 2:16), while Progressive Christianity can focus more on inclusivity over doctrine.

Summary of the Key Digressions:

  • Deconstructionism: Challenges biblical authority and focuses more on individual experience and social justice, often questioning the exclusive claims of Christ.

  • Emergent Church: Rejects biblical inerrancy and embraces subjective experiences over doctrine, while often downplaying doctrines such as hell, salvation through Christ alone, and eternal judgment.

  • Progressive Christianity: Focuses on social justice and inclusivity, often questioning traditional teachings on salvation, sin, and the authority of Scripture, and leaning toward a universalist view of salvation.

In contrast, the First Church (as described in Acts and taught by Jesus and Paul) centered its message on:

  1. Salvation through Jesus Christ alone (John 14:6, Acts 4:12).

  2. The authority and inerrancy of Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16).

  3. The importance of personal repentance and faith in Christ (Mark 1:15, Acts 2:38).

  4. The call to preach the gospel and make disciples of all nations (Matthew 28:19-20).

  5. The unity of the Church, with sound doctrine as the foundation (Ephesians 4:4-6).

The movements mentioned above, while potentially addressing issues of justice, inclusivity, or personal spiritual growth, often diverge from the First Church’s focus on the clarity of the gospel message and its exclusive nature for salvation.

Conclude: There is a fine point between where we CAN disagree, SHOULD disagree, and OUGHT To disagree. Therefore this non accusing writer is not finger pointing at these movements of any other, It should all stand before the judgement seat of Christ: for each individual, including this myself, will be there one day ALONE..like Thee and Them, and All Others.

We just include all of these, with the rest, including this teacher, her self with regard to “every believer” to hear God about all of this per themselves

Mega Apostle Paul Galatians 1:8–9 (KJV)

8 “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.”

9 “As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”

  • “Accursed” (Greek: anathema) means set apart for destruction, cut off from Christ, or under divine judgment.

  • Paul is saying: even if he himself or a supernatural being like an angel teaches something different than the Gospel of Christ, that person is under a curse.

  • This shows how seriously God takes distorting the Gospel—which is the message of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone (see Ephesians 2:8–9).

I present this for each person to reconsider, to ponder and to be made fully aware.

CHECKLIST

Keep your ears and eyes open for these clear markers of Christ’s Good News.

+ Biblical Truth ++ Key Scripture !!! Why It Matters
Jesus is the only way to the Father John 14:6 Jesus is not a way—He’s the Way. Pluralism is false.
Jesus is fully God and Man John 1:1,14; Colossians 2:9 Denying Christ’s divinity nullifies the Cross and resurrection.
Salvation is by grace through faith Ephesians 2:8–9; Titus 3:5 You can’t earn salvation. Grace is a gift.
Justified by faith, not works or law Romans 3:28; Galatians 2:16 Mixing law + grace is spiritual bondage.
Jesus rose from the dead 1 Corinthians 15:1–4, 13–19 Resurrection is central—without it, no hope.
No condemnation in Christ Romans 8:1 The Gospel frees from guilt and shame.
All believers are one in Christ Galatians 3:28 No racism, sexism, or classism in the true Gospel.
Scripture is final authority 2 Timothy 3:16–17 Emotion, visions, and trends must align with the Bible.
The Holy Spirit indwells believers Galatians 4:6; Romans 8:9 Real faith includes relationship and transformation.
We are led by the Spirit, not law Romans 7:6; Galatians 5:18 True liberty = Spirit-led life, not legalism.
Paul’s teaching = Christ’s Gospel Galatians 1:11–12; 2 Peter 3:15–16 Rejecting Paul is rejecting Scripture.

LOOKING OUT FOR THE “TRUE “ GOSPEL

(Recognize the real so you can spot the counterfeit)

🔍 Gospel Truth / Trait 📖 Scripture Reference 📝 Description / What to Look For
Jesus is the only way to salvation John 14:6 Salvation is through Jesus Christ alone—no works, no rituals, no manmade conditions added.
Salvation by grace, not works Ephesians 2:8-9 Grace is a gift; no performance, tithes, or behaviors “earn” salvation.
Repentance and personal relationship Mark 1:15; Romans 10:9-10 True Gospel calls for heart repentance and personal faith in Jesus.
Jesus died, rose again, and is returning 1 Corinthians 15:1–4 The core message: Jesus’ death, burial, resurrection, and future return.
Christ’s love, not manipulation Romans 5:8 The Gospel draws by love, not fear, guilt, or pressure.
Fruit of the Spirit = Evidence Galatians 5:22-23 True gospel cultivates love, peace, self-control, not chaos or harshness.
Encourages testing leaders and teaching 1 John 4:1; Acts 17:11 You are allowed (and expected) to test teaching and ask questions.
Builds unity, not elite tribes Ephesians 4:1-6 Avoids elitism, sectarianism, or us-vs-them mentalities. Promotes unity.
Freedom in Christ Galatians 5:1 True Gospel sets people free from sin, fear, legalism—not into new bondage.
Points to Jesus, not man 2 Corinthians 4:5 Ministry that glorifies a man, brand, title, or prophet over Jesus is suspect.
TO SUPPORT: [wpedon id=”1106″]

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI

Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Author: admin
Christian author, minister, leadership, movement founder Cross Body Unity "A Maven of Apostolic Theology" revivalist, prophetic prayer warrior, apostolic theologian, for the multicultural Body of Christ

Leave a Reply