PROBABLE ROOTS OF SHOW BIZ CHRISTIANITY

PART 9 THE CHARISMATIC PATRIARCHY
When Ministry Becomes a Master

PROBABLE ROOTS OF AMBITIOUS, SHOW BIZ CHRISTIANITY

” I am for Apollos! No, I am for Apostle Paul! No, No, NO! I am for Cephas (Peter)”

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI

“Choice Gossip is the poor human’s Bread, they love to Feast on it” Church of Ego 101

“Demas has left the front lines ministry: for he loved the things of this passing world more”ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

Not then world wide famous…Saint (“off scouring of the world,alias”dung”) pure Paul

T.D’Arcy“You don’t have to be a star to be in Jesus show. Just be yourself and let Him shine through you!”

When Ministry Becomes a Master

“We deserveย  to be Solomons!”

And wondering “Who put the ELF in SELFIE?”

From Israel’s “Desireย  for a King”

Compared with “I am PRO Paul VS I am PRO Apollos VS I am PRO Cephas”ย 

With the Ambitious Modern Christian Choosy Celebrity “Wannabe” Culture

ย Introduction: The Desire for a King and the Rise of Celebrity Culture

As we continue our exploration into the dynamics of church leadership and ministry culture, we must acknowledge that the desire for a king or celebrity leader has existed for a long time. From ancient Israelโ€™s longing for a king to the rise of celebrity-driven ministries in the modern church, humanity has always wrestled with power, influence, and the allure of fame.

In this article, we will trace the evolution of this desire for celebrity from the time of Israelโ€™s kings to the celebrity culture within the church today. We will examine how this need for recognition and power has affected the churchโ€™s unity, shifted its focus away from Christโ€™s humble example, and led to a dangerous trend of division, celebrity worship, and wannabeism within the body of Christ.

1. Israel’s Desire for a King: A Desire for Power

In 1 Samuel 8:4-7, the Israelites came to Samuel and demanded a king, saying, “Appoint a king to lead us, such as all the other nations have.” They were dissatisfied with being led by Godโ€™s prophets and instead wanted to follow a king like the surrounding nations. This desire was driven by a carnal longing for visible power, prestige, and authority. Godโ€™s response to this was, โ€œThey have not rejected you, but they have rejected me as their kingโ€ (1 Samuel 8:7).

This desire for a visible, powerful king is deeply rooted in human natureโ€”a desire to follow someone they can see, touch, and who holds influence over them. From Israelโ€™s request for a king, humanity’s natural inclination toward celebrity and power began.

ย 2. The Rise of Celebrity Culture in the Church

Fast forward to the time of the apostle Paul, and we see a similar dynamic playing out in the early church. In 1 Corinthians 1:12, Paul addresses the factions forming within the Corinthian church as they aligned themselves with different ministers: โ€œI am of Paul,โ€ โ€œI am of Apollos,โ€ and โ€œI am of Cephas.โ€ This is an early example of celebrity culture in the church, where followers began to identify with leaders based on personality, charisma, and status rather than on the gospel message itself.

In much the same way, todayโ€™s church is heavily influenced by celebrity leaders. The rise of megachurches, TV ministries, and social media influencers in the Christian sphere has exalted human leaders above Christ. The desire for a visible leaderโ€”someone who embodies power, influence, and successโ€”continues to mirror Israel’s desire for a king.

ย 3. The Rise of Non-Servant Leadership: “Wannabeism” in Ministry

The issue with the rise of celebrity ministers and celebrity worship in the church is not just about following leaders but about a culture of wannabeism. Just as the Israelites sought a king for their own glory, many today want to become famous ministers, “wannabes” who long for influence, power, and recognition. This mindset is rooted in the flesh and the world, not in servant leadership.

We see this in the desire to replicate the lifestyles of successful Christian celebrities, whether through the prosperity gospel or the notion of a powerful, influential ministry. The focus is often not on servant-hearted leadership modeled by Christ, but on being successful and well-known, like Solomon or the modern celebrity minister.

Paulโ€™s words in 1 Corinthians 4:1-2 remind us that leaders should be seen as servants of Christ, entrusted with the mysteries of God. However, the rise of celebrity-driven ministries often turns leaders into business tycoons, and churches into highly marketable brands.

ย 4. Prosperity, Influence, and the False Promise of Power

The prosperity gospel is another area where the desire for power and fame has infiltrated modern ministry. Preachers and leaders who promise wealth, health, and success are often revered by those who want to gain the same material prosperity. This teaching breeds the “bless me only” mentality, where followers focus on receiving material blessings instead of being transformed into Christโ€™s servant-hearted image.

Moreover, this mindset encourages the wannabe celebrity cultureโ€”where individuals are encouraged to pursue influence and status rather than the cross and humility that Christ modeled. This phenomenon is perpetuated by the increasing obsession with media and social platforms, where people look to TV ministries or Instagram influencers for spiritual guidance, rather than rooting their faith in biblical principles.

ย 5. A Counterfeit of Christ: The Celebrity Christ vs. the Suffering Servant
We’reย  too progressive, accomplished and cool to identify with cruel Cross, the formless, Isaiah 53ย  suffering Christ

In Isaiah 53, we are confronted with the true nature of Christ as the suffering servant. He was despised, rejected, and bore our transgressions. The church is called to model His suffering, selflessness, and humility, not to seek glory or power in the worldโ€™s sense. Yet, too often, modern Christianity is enthralled with a counterfeit of Christโ€”the celebrity Christ who reigns in glory and prosperity, not the suffering servant.

When Christians seek to follow after the celebrity model, they are drawn away from the humble walk of faith that requires suffering and self-sacrifice. Too many today believe that prosperity and worldly influence are signs of Godโ€™s favor, rather than the character and humility Christ exemplified on the cross

ย 6. Healing the Divide: True Biblical Leadership and Unity

How can the church begin to heal the damage caused by celebrity culture?

We must return to the biblical model of leadership, where servant leadership and mutual submission are the hallmarks of community. As Paul said, โ€œFor who makes you different from anyone else? What do you have that you did not receive?โ€ (1 Corinthians 4:7). The church must shift its focus back to the gospel message and the call to serve rather than elevating any individual leader.

Moreover, instead of focusing on celebrity and fame, the church should emphasize faithfulness to Christ and the humble service He modeled. Leaders should be accountable and transparent, leading by example rather than by command or title.

ย 7. Moving Forward: Reclaiming the Church for Christ

The church needs a reformationโ€”not one of power and influence, but of humility and service. We must begin to reject the celebrity-driven model and return to the true unity and servanthood that Paul urged in his letters. Our focus must return to Christ and His mission for the world, which is not about wealth or fame, but about serving others and loving God with our whole hearts.

ย Conclusion: Embracing the True Heart of Ministry

The desire for a king and the celebrity-driven culture in the church today are not new. They trace their roots back to Israelโ€™s rejection of God and the early churchโ€™s divisions over leadership. But Godโ€™s kingdom is not built on fame, power, or celebrity status. It is built on humble service, mutual submission, and a genuine love for one another.

In the next part of this series, we will continue to explore how to foster true community in the church and restore the servant leadership that honors Christ and brings healing to the body of Christ.

Taveau Wonders About this Ongoing Repeatedย  Phenomenon

Was “I am for Apollos / I am for Paul” the Beginning of Personality-Driven Church?

“Each one of you says, โ€˜I am of Paul,โ€™ or โ€˜I am of Apollos,โ€™ or โ€˜I am of Cephas,โ€™ or โ€˜I am of Christ.โ€™ Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?โ€ โ€”1 Corinthians 1:12โ€“13 NKJV

1. Top-Down Church Government: Early Roots?

Paulโ€™s rebuke in 1 Corinthians 1 and 3 reveals the early danger of elevation of leaders into spiritual figureheads. This is the seedbed of hierarchical top-down ministry: once people start aligning allegiance with personalities over Christ, human systems take root.

By the time of post-apostolic Christianity (2nd-3rd centuries), church governance drifted from organic community (Ephesians 4) into monarchical bishoprics, leading to Romeโ€™s top-down clergy/laity split.

* So yes, this division over human leaders hints at the early temptation toward top-down authoritarian ministry systems, which came to dominate much of Church history.

2๏ธ. Celebrity Culture in Ministry? Origins in Corinth?

โ€œWhile one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?โ€ โ€”1 Corinthians 3:4

This scripture shows that celebrity-style ministry isn’t newโ€”it began subtly even in the First Church era. People werenโ€™t just dividing over doctrine; they were attracted to personalities, styles, charisma.

  • Paul was apostolic, pioneering, intense

  • Apollos was eloquent and philosophical (Acts 18:24)

  • Cephas (Peter) brought Jewish tradition and authority

Each one offered a different flavor of ministry, which caused divisions. But Paul sharply corrects this.

++ It wasnโ€™t about who sounded bestโ€”it was about Christ. Personality cults are spiritual immaturity and a threat to body unity

3๏ธ. Pharisaical Levitical Legalism: A Pattern?

You asked whether this also connects to Levitical Phariseeismโ€”yes, and hereโ€™s why:

  • The Pharisees built their entire system on religious hierarchy, status, and authority policing.

  • By aligning with a spiritual leader as your โ€œtribe,โ€ you recreate a spiritual caste systemโ€”whoโ€™s inside, whoโ€™s right, whoโ€™s โ€œunder authority.โ€

Paul was clearly resisting that. So was Jesus.

4๏ธ. Jesusโ€™ Warnings in Matthew 23: Donโ€™t Call Yourself โ€œRabbiโ€

โ€œDo not be called โ€˜Rabbiโ€™; for One is your Teacher, the Christ, and you are all brethren. Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven.โ€ โ€”Matthew 23:8โ€“9

Jesus clearly dismantled title-based, elite religious hierarchy:

  • โ€œRabbiโ€ = elite teacher

  • โ€œFatherโ€ = spiritual patriarch

  • โ€œMasterโ€ = one in charge of others

++ This wasnโ€™t a ban on spiritual rolesโ€”it was a reproof of pride, control, and elitism.

TD Main Point

When leadership is about titles, status, funds, having many followers, or whoโ€™s under who, it mimics the Pharisees, not Christ.

5๏ธ. Sign of Division: Cult of Personality in the First Church?

Absolutely. Paul links it directly to carnality and immaturity:

โ€œFor you are still carnal. For where there are envy, strife, and divisions among youโ€ฆ are you not behaving like mere men?โ€ โ€”1 Corinthians 3:3

Aligning with human leaders, instead of focusing on Christ, created early divisions, which are still with us today:

  • Denominational splits

  • “My pastor said!” tribes

  • Who is YOUR “Spiritual Father?”
  • Celebrity online teachers as “pop culture rock stars”

  • Apostolic networks with elite access

  • Prophetic movements with secret revelations ” only for the elite gifted, like them”

  • Super pride and gifted elite, exclusive ‘respecter of persons” religious spirit.

These are all modern versions of โ€œI follow Paul / I follow Apollos.

6๏ธ. Other Doctrines & Practices That Emerged (Biblical vs. Not)

Letโ€™s compare a few:

Practice Bible-Based? Comment
Organic Fivefold Community (Eph 4) โœ… Yes All gifts serving together to equip saints
Title-Centric Ministry (“Apostle So-and-So”) โŒ No Warned against in Matthew 23
Apostolic Networks that control territory โŒ No Paul’s model was mutual respect, not turf
Celebrity pastor followings โŒ No Paul rebuked this directly in 1 Cor 3
Discipling by submission to a man โŒ No First Church made disciples of Christ, not of Paul
Equipping others to do the work โœ… Yes Ephesians 4:12 โ€“ build others up
Ministry brands & followers โŒ No Creates division and hierarchy

ย BEST TO BE FINAL DAYS HOLY BIBLE!
“Fruit, Not Title, Proves Authority”

As I wisely said earlier: โ€œItโ€™s the fruit, not the persons.โ€ Jesus confirmed this:

โ€œBy their fruits you will know them.โ€ โ€”Matthew 7:20

Whether itโ€™s Apollos, Paul, or a modern-day prophet, the test is fruit:

  • Does the ministry produce love, humility, maturity?

  • Or division, control, fame-seeking, elitism?

Aside To Those in ESP Patrichian Patriarchal Charismatic Movements:

1. The First Church Was Not a Hierarchy.
The early church, as shown in Ephesians 5:21, operated on mutual submission in the fear of the Lordโ€”not hierarchical control. There was no top-down “chain of command” requiring all women to submit to every man who claimed authority. The apostolic foundation was servant-based, Christ-modeled, and relationalโ€”not dominating or suspicious.

2. Philippians 2:12 says to โ€œwork out your own salvation with fear and trembling.โ€ Thatโ€™s the believerโ€™s right to hear from God personally, male or female. You do not need the stamp of a self-appointed patriarch to be led by the Spirit. The Holy Spirit gives discernment to the individualโ€”period.

3. James 3:17 describes godly wisdom as pure, peaceable, gentle, easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruit, without partiality** and without hypocrisy. If your doctrine or leadership style doesnโ€™t resemble that, itโ€™s not Christโ€”itโ€™s carnality wrapped in religious language.

**James 3:17 partiality: The First Church was not biased, culturally, racially or gender. Howeverย  those coming out of the society culture were. Peter himself, at first a wavering immature Levitical Legalist, evidently had a grace given Holy Spirit “revelation” pierce through his skilled and firmly made up mind, for heย  exclaimed, “I perceive, that we ought not mingle the faith with the respecter of persons”

5. Galatians 3:28 declares: โ€œThere is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.โ€ Anyone teaching otherwise is operating in legalism, flesh, or fearโ€”not the Spirit.

Apostle Paul said “when you put on Christ, there is no male, female, bond or free’.” This means that while there are certainly male and female differences, also the head of household marriage Ephesians 5:21 and 22, there is stillย  equality in respect, care and value, yet chain of command in a legally wedded Christian marriage, Bible submitted household.

“Women are not to be regarded as less than and second-class in the Body of Christย  be it

in a Christian ministry, fellowship, family or marriage” T.D’Arcy

“The following (beneath) is aquired knowledge, extra surprising, very unwanted, but it should be said to give fellow visitors a chance to beย  on the alert and to tell them, they are “wanting and falling very short of being “First Church Authentic” for NOW one must pass beingย  “passing the test” and “qualifying” to be “accepted is this sort of Beloved. (elite narcissist fruit) said, due to pastor Taveau’s frequent God specifically Sent “Body Surfing” as as single, but mature, SENT mega office but calm, peaceful, abiding James 3:17 fruit female,and unknown, experienced, non novice ” area newbie and expat” amongst theย  the worship “talented and very gifted ,elite” spirit of office prophecy in theย  WELP ‘seer” different mega celebrity office wannabe subcultures. A very frustrating Isaiah 5:20 “can’t tellย  a weary, visiting, mutually submitted also supportiveย  Elijah “type’ sitting there in peace, listening to the good sermon, from a warlike dark witch or a dominating dire Jezebel. I, Sister Taveau D’Arcy shook my feet of and departed this entire religious do gooder move, 2021 UNLESS… and UNTIL they Get OVER them Special SELVES and Repent. Reform And learn to Respectfully Relate (I John 1:7)

TD’S Own History Research Produced Opinion

The New Testament does not teach that women must be universally submitted to male authority, especially not in the blanket form that some charismatic-patriarchal teachings imply. That doctrine is extra-biblical, rooted in tradition and controlโ€”not in Christ

And while the growth of the Christian ministry into a more authoritarian, set in it’s house ways,ย  hierarchy form, and as it grew more formal, culturally male oriented then the morphing of all Bible training with the world(but the First Church organic mutual submission Ephesians 5:21, servant leader form) the maturing and evolution of “what the Church” was infiltrated by society, and the Roman and Greek forms, views and narrow minded bias thoughts. History reports that leader women were given equal respect and often used in ministry… until after this time period.

And (as I report on several occasions) research shows in history ,that while Paul gave the command ‘to keep the women silent in church” that while he did say that, he meant it to the culture at the time and that later then freedom and equal gender regard and respect were in the first Church, however the Greek and Roman influences seemed to bring fear, bias, misogyny and top down control so it pushed the leader women back as is now. (need to say much more later, but not in this article today)

***We note The New Testament does not teach that women must be universally submitted to male authority, especially not in the blanket form that some charismatic-patriarchal teachings imply. That doctrine is extra-biblical, rooted in tradition and controlโ€”not in Christ.

(** But as Taveau D’Arcy does not presume to know it all, or want to MYOB, yet she knows quite a lot) I would say “COUNT THE COST: However, if YOU feel like Holy Spirit wants to join (officially) to any movement or church like that, then take as” your freedom in Christ” to do that. But I would watch out and seek the Lord due to what goes on out there today!

.A PS To the Quiet, Submitted, Word-Knowing Ministers (like this apostolic Mother in Christ):
You have every rightโ€”biblically, spiritually, and theologicallyโ€”to stand, to speak, and to discern. You walk under the fruit of the Spirit, not the fear of man. Keep living out James 3:17. Keep leading with maturity. Your silence is not weaknessโ€”itโ€™s strength under control.

I, You, These are not the Holy Spirit.
The Body of Christ is called to restore, not control (Galatians 6:1). Jesus led by example, not domination. Paul reasoned from the Scripturesโ€”not accusations, fear or the high horse peer pressure. Psalm 121

Plus: I advice strongly that you “RESPECTFULLY” yet LOUDLYย  do notย  ACCEPTย  being biased targeted, misogynistic viewed as ” under suspicion” just because you are a female leader also if you not a part of any WELP ,WELM sort of biased controllingย  Bible legalistic or movement.

Letโ€™s train the Body back to Christlike governance, where leadership serves, and all believersโ€”male and femaleโ€”walk in mutual respect, honor, and Spirit-led maturity

Back on Celebrity Christian Topic-

Q. Taveau Asks Dear Chat GPT AI

Historically does it Bible appear that this “was” ” has always been ”ย  in a part of the fallen Human Nature?

Meaning: “To Give Us a King!โ€

โ€œNow make us a king to judge us like all the nations.โ€
โ€”1 Samuel 8:5

Chat Responds:

Yesโ€”this deep desire to exalt a person and be governed by a visible, charismatic leader is an ancient fallen pattern.

ย It began in the heart of Old Testament Israel:

The people were tired of hearing directly from God through humble prophets like Samuel. They looked around at the nations with kings, grandeur, pageantryโ€”and they wanted that kind of visible hierarchy.

God warned them through Samuel:

โ€œThey have not rejected you, but they have rejected Me, that I should not reign over them.โ€
โ€”1 Samuel 8:7

++ย  So the desire for a king, a celebrity, a strongman, a tribal figurehead, has always been part of the carnal soul:

  • In Israel: โ€œGive us Saul!โ€

  • In Corinth: โ€œI follow Apollos!โ€

  • Today: โ€œI follow Apostle So-and-So!โ€

Itโ€™s the same human pattern in a different generation.

The Tie-In with Paulโ€™s Correction in 1 Corinthians 1โ€“3

Just like Israel wanted a king to represent them, the Corinthians began to divide over whose spiritual leader was best.

Paul essentially says: โ€œWhy are you crowning men as kings over your spiritual life?โ€


Only Christ deserves that place.

Making A Point Forย  Today

This same desire for celebrity, safety under a strong personality, or elite status by association is behind many modern-day forms of:

  • Apostolic networks

  • Celebrity-driven churches

  • Prophetic cliques

  • Worship collectives with cult followings

  • Teaching ministries with brands instead of shepherds

The temptation to crown human leaders, just like Israel crowned Saul, is still here.

ย Making A Point: Jesus Reverses It in the New Covenant

โ€œYou are all brethrenโ€ฆ One is your Master, even Christ.โ€ โ€”Matthew 23:8

Making A Point: Paul echoes this in Ephesians 4:1โ€“6:

โ€œThere is one body, one Spiritโ€ฆ one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of allโ€ฆโ€

Excellent Ministry Point:

True leadership (apostolic, prophetic, pastoral) existsโ€”but itโ€™s:

  • To serve and equip

  • To build up the Body

  • To train others, not exalt themselves

  • To preserve unity, not create mini-kingdoms

Summary Teaching Point to Add:

Human nature has always wanted a visible kingโ€”someone to follow, crown, and feel safe under. But God’s desire was always for direct, loving relationship. Every time the church exalts a person, system, or ministry turf over Jesus and organic community, it’s echoing the cry of Israel: โ€œGive us a king.โ€

Lets Us “follow” (meaning toย  Trust) Apostle Paul

This is a powerful observation and timely messageโ€”rooted in biblical truth, spiritual discernment, and deep cultural awareness. Letโ€™s teach it clearly, directly, and with compassion in the blog-style format youโ€™re using.

Point:ย  Wannabeism: The Celebrity Trap

โ€œFor Demas has forsaken me, having loved this present worldโ€ฆโ€
โ€”2 Timothy 4:10

There is a new temptation in the Body of Christโ€”โ€œWannabeism.โ€
The desire not just to serve Christ, but to become the next world-famous Christian celebrity.

Itโ€™s the Demas Mindset: chasing the world, the platform, the spotlight, the glamor of ministry โ€œsuccess.โ€
And this is not newโ€”it’s just now global, monetized, and platformed

++A Mixture: World, Flesh, and Devil

  • ย The World: The marketing machine, the media, the personal brand

  • ย The Flesh: The ambition, the craving for applause, the desire to be โ€œthe next big thingโ€

  • ย The Devil: Whispering lies of identity, manipulating vanity and insecurity

This form of Christianity teaches โ€œBless me only,โ€ not โ€œTake up your cross.โ€

++ From Cross to Stage: Recasting Jesus as Solomon

In many of these elite, gifted, high-functioning global ministries, we notice a subtle recasting of Christ:

  • Not as the Isaiah 53 Suffering Servant

  • Not as the Lamb of God, slain for the world

  • But as a kind of Solomon figure: ruling in splendor, glory, wisdom, gold, and kingdom power

Yet the First Church focused on the crucified and risen Christ:

โ€œWe preach Christ crucified… the power of God and the wisdom of God.โ€
โ€”1 Corinthians 1:23-24

++ False Modeling: Trained by the ’80s & ’90s Media Wave

From the 1980s and 1990s onward, a new kind of Christian training emergedโ€”not in humility, relationships, and servant-leadership, but in:

  • TV-stage performance

  • Famous conferences

  • Autographed books

  • Worship celebrity

  • Apostolic stardom

  • Online platforms with โ€œFollow Meโ€ more than โ€œFollow Jesusโ€

NOTE:

This is not all evil, but without balance and discipleship, it has trained many young leaders to see โ€œministryโ€ as performance-based success, not servant-based community.

++ Bible Contrast: Jesus, Paul, and the First Church

+ Jesus:

  • Rode a donkey, not a white horse

  • Ate with outcasts

  • Was despised and rejected (Isaiah 53)

  • Died with no robe, no fame, no gloryโ€”just obedience

+ Paul:

  • Made tents, took no money, taught house to house

  • Wept for churches

  • Was beaten, imprisoned, poor

  • Refused to let anyone say, โ€œI am of Paulโ€ (1 Cor. 3)

+ The First Church:

  • Shared possessions

  • Met in homes

  • Raised leaders in community, not through events

  • Trained through suffering and service, not conferences and clicks

++ Teaching Point to Add:

Wannabeism is the spirit of Demasโ€”loving this present world.

It is built on a “mixture” of (Isaac and Ishmael as in mean) ambition, vanity, and cultural training, not the cross. Christ is not a Solomon-style figurehead for gold and glory. He is Isaiah 53โ€”the Suffering Servantโ€”and only through the cross will resurrection come.

Basic Theological Main Points

ย Never cease to beย  aware of the signs of false authority.(even of your well intentioned own!)

Hereโ€™s how they can determine if someone is using false authority:

1. Recognizing the Fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23)

  • A key indicator of true Christian leadership is the fruit of the Spiritโ€”love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. If a leader or individual is demonstrating behaviors opposite of theseโ€”such as harshness, manipulation, or prideโ€”it could signal a misuse of authority.

  • Red flag: If someone exercises authority with impatience, arrogance, or manipulation rather than humility, it might be a sign of false authority.

2. Authority Rooted in Servanthood (Matthew 20:25-28)

  • True Christian leadership is modeled on Mark 9:35). Jesusโ€™ example of leadership was to serve, not to dominate or control. If a leader demands respect and submission rather than earning it through loving service, it might point to false authority.

  • Red flag: Leaders who expect blind obedience without a reciprocal relationship of love and service could be exhibiting false authority.

3. Alignment with Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16-17)

  • Any authority that strays from biblical principles or tries to bend Scripture to justify unbiblical behavior should be questioned. True leaders stand firm on the Word of God, not on personal opinions or traditions.

  • Red flag: If a leaderโ€™s actions or words are inconsistent with Scripture, especially if they prioritize personal power or control, itโ€™s a sign of false authority.

4. The Tone and Approach (Ephesians 4:15)

  • Leaders must speak the truth in love. If a leaderโ€™s tone is harsh, dismissive, unduly smug or berating domineering,even raging, slapping… this is often a sign of false authority and even of abuse. True leaders engage others with respect, compassion, and understanding, aiming to build others up.

  • Red flag: A leader who consistently uses harsh, condemning language or focuses on putting others down rather than lifting them up may be operating from a place of false authority.

5. Submission to Godโ€™s Will (James 4:7-10)

  • A godly leader is someone who submits themselves to Godโ€™s will and trusts Him to direct their path. False authority often operates from self-interest or pride, asserting control over others in ways that contradict humility.

  • Red flag: Leaders who refuse to listen to counsel or feedback, and instead rely on their own wisdom and power, may not be following God’s leading.

6. Unyielding Control or Manipulation (1 Peter 5:3)

  • True leadership allows others the freedom to make choices and grow. If a leader is excessively controlling or manipulative, itโ€™s often a sign of false authority. They may use tactics such as guilt, fear, or flattery to assert control.

  • Red flag: If a leader uses manipulation, fear tactics, or bullying to get their way, that indicates a misuse of authority.

7. Respect for Boundaries and Free Will (Galatians 6:1)

  • A godly leader respects the dignity, autonomy, and free will of others. They correct and guide with gentleness, recognizing that people are responsible for their own choices.

  • Red flag: If a leader insists on crossing personal boundaries, disregards othersโ€™ autonomy, or imposes their will without compassion, they are likely abusing their authority.

8. Accountability and Transparency (Hebrews 13:17)

  • Leaders should be accountable to others, especially those they lead. If a leader is not open to accountability, they may be operating in a spirit of false authority.

  • Red flag: Leaders who avoid accountability or refuse to be transparent about their actions or motives might be acting out of false authority.

9. Consistency and Integrity (Matthew 23:2-3)

  • True leaders are consistent and lead by example. If someoneโ€™s actions do not align with their words, or they exhibit hypocrisy, their authority is likely false.

  • Red flag: Leaders whose actions contradict their teachings, or who are inconsistent in their behavior, are displaying false authority.

How the Attending Person Can Tell:

  • Discernment: As someone attending or following a leader, watch for patterns in the leaderโ€™s actions. Are they more focused on building themselves up or on building up the community and serving others?

  • Character Reflection: Does the leader reflect the humility and servitude of Christ, or do they focus on their own power and control?

  • Engage with Scripture: Ensure that the leaderโ€™s teachings align with biblical principles and not personal agenda. If the leaderโ€™s actions deviate from Scripture, itโ€™s a warning.

  • Check for Fruit: Pay attention to the fruit of the leaderโ€™s ministry. Are people being lifted up, or are they being put down or controlled?

Ultimately, an earnest leader will approach these situations with wisdom, always seeking to reflect Christโ€™s love and humility, and they will prioritize a community of respect, growth, and mutual edification.

Excerpt: Personal Test Driver for the Mature, Healthy Wise Body of Christ:
And this is what pastor Taveau says whenever she notices that she is being “witch watched” “cult watched” from far off, and waits for them to come to check her out in person, like a authentic Bible believing respectful “real” Christian

โ€œIf they are so curious about you, why not do what Jesus did and walk over to say hello?โ€

“Fault Finding Evil Eye Poor Them”

(yet a giant prophetic main point)

In todayโ€™s prophetic and apostolic circles, a troubling trend has emerged: leaders using โ€œHoly Spirit discernmentโ€ as a tool for spiritual surveillance. This post explores one such firsthand experience and addresses how control disguised as discernment is not propheticโ€”it’s charismatic witchcraft.

The Encounter: “Gatekeeper Apostles” and Spiritual Voyeurism

He (the gifted talented but always Poor Him so called Apostle)ย  opened a book by C. Peter Wagner and read aloud a line about how some apostles are โ€œset over the gatesโ€ of every region. He seemed to believe he and his apostolic circle were such gatekeepersโ€”divinely entitled to evaluate others’ spiritual lives.

Suddenly, I understood why their ministry culture felt so elite, invasive, and controlling.

They acted as if they had the right to read our private thoughts, speculate about hidden motives, and judge whether we were โ€œsubmittedโ€ to their system.

I had grown up Baptist. So my natural question was:

โ€œIf theyโ€™re so curious about me, why not just come over and say hello?โ€
โ€œWhy not ask me about my theology? Why not build a real relationship like Jesus did?โ€

Instead, I saw this same pattern repeated: suspicion, hierarchy, false accusations, spiritual distance, and cold control masked as prophetic discernment.

After that was the start of this over the long haul, piecing it together, around the United States, whenever this devil arose and stared straight at me, stared, often spooky flinched, but would never walk over to respectfully purely introduce to ‘determine and purely relate.) and finallyย  35 years of observing this,(not any dark skinned or Christian denominational, but only in Tongue talking moving in the Book of Acts gifts and. great worship, WELP… I finally realized what it was: Being Psychically “divined, read” and “to control” I now call this out asย  another form of
Charismatic witchcraft.

MAKING A POINT:

When Discernment Isnโ€™t Holy Spirit-Led

โ€œThe good shepherd knows his sheep, and his sheep know him.โ€ โ€” John 10:14

True Christian discernment doesnโ€™t lurk, surveil, or spiritually scan people from afar.

Real apostleship looks like Jesus the Servant, not an elite gatekeeper with secret access to your soul.

Biblical Red Flags to Watch For

  • Leaders who feel entitled to know your โ€œheartโ€ without relationship

  • Pressure to submit to human systems over personal conviction

  • Private accusations made without any one to one, in private, calm, respecting mature Minister Galatians 6;1, Matthew 18:15-16 relational accountability, I John 1:7

  • Prophecies used to shame or manipulate others

  • A top-down control structure with no grace for questions or diversity, a leader hierarchy formed to thwart being held accountable or to govern by instilled totatiatarian control, fear ,and abuse

Charismatic Witchcraft = Manipulation in Godโ€™s Name

โ€œRebellion is as the sin of witchcraftโ€ฆโ€ โ€” 1 Samuel 15:23
โ€œHaving a form of godliness but denying the powerโ€ฆโ€ โ€” 2 Timothy 3:5


MAKING BIG POINTS:

  • Growing in Christian organized ministry, Holy Spirit mixed in with divining mind reading psychic, voyeuristic spying accusing (Salem witch trials like) occult. This is rampant;

 

  • Witchcraft in Scripture is not just spells or potionsโ€”itโ€™s any manipulation of people or outcomes apart from Godโ€™s Spirit.

When this type of “leader discernmentโ€ is used to:

  • ‘”inner far off read people rather than to relate..it’s to control peopleโ€™s lives,save their hide
  • To project themselves out to ‘read their thoughts” to presume to determine their (your, my) inner most thirst, perceived sins or human thoughts. (it is OUR OFFICIAL BUSINESS not theirs)

  • or judge,to presume, from afar without relationship,

โ€ฆitโ€™s not prophetic.
Itโ€™s spiritual tyranny. It is accusing, dangerous and demonic

The Kingdom of God Is Freedom, Not Fear

โ€œWhere the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.โ€ โ€” 2 Corinthians 3:17

GOOD POINT
God is not building an elite surveillance network.(that’s Job 41 “Leviathan” spooky pride) Noย  Heโ€™s building a bodyโ€”a familyโ€”where everyone is valued, heard, and led by Christ directly.

POINT:

If someone demands that YOU are UNDER submission TO THEM…without even starting and offering a relationshipโ€”thatโ€™s a red flag.

(TD has had this happen more 3 times and will share on it soon)

POINT:

If they exalt themselves as a Big Boss โ€œgatekeeperโ€ who can monitor others without conversationโ€”thatโ€™s not apostolic.

Final Thought: These Can Title Themselves All They Want Yet

True Apostles Donโ€™t Spyโ€”They Serve

POINT: The apostolic isnโ€™t about position. Itโ€™s about posture.

Itโ€™s not about policing othersโ€™ spiritual lives. Itโ€™s about ‘servant elders” walking beside them with humility and love.

TD Notes
If youโ€™ve experienced spiritual surveillance, control, or shame in the name of prophecy or discernmentโ€”youโ€™re not crazy.

It happens.And it needs to be addressed.

TD Makes A Point

Jesus doesnโ€™t control you. He calls you.
He doesnโ€™t shame you. He lifts you up.

A REVIEW OF TOP DOWN CHURCH AUTHORITY MEANING

Top-Down Church Authority vs. Jesus, the First Church, and Paul

Hereโ€™s a direct, scripture-based comparison of top-down authoritarian church systems vs. Jesus, the First Church, and Apostle Paulโ€”so you can clearly show how this unbiblical leadership model strays from the New Testament example:

1. Top-Down Authority Today:

  • One person or a small elite group claims spiritual supremacy

  • Members must โ€œsubmitโ€ to that personโ€™s vision to be โ€œsafeโ€

  • Leaders surveil, control, or micromanage peopleโ€™s lives (even marriage, children, rest, job, etc.)

  • No space for dialogue, personal conscience, or direct leading by God

  • Those who leave are shunned, slandered, or labeled “rebellious”

THIS is not biblical authority. It is control.

++Jesusโ€™ Leadership Style: Servant, Not Ruler

โ€œYou know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over themโ€ฆ Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant.โ€
โ€”Matthew 20:25โ€“26

  • Jesus never forced submission

  • He invited relationship, never demanded titles or rank

  • He washed feet (John 13), didn’t sit on a throne

  • He let people walk away (John 6:66) without threatening curses or shame

+ True spiritual authority always reflects Jesus’ humility and self-sacrificeโ€”not coercion.

++ The First Church (Book of Acts): Shared Leadership & Liberty

โ€œNow the Berean Jews were of more noble characterโ€ฆ for they examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.โ€
โ€”Acts 17:11

  • Even Paul was examinedโ€”and he welcomed it!

  • Acts shows the plurality of elders, not one-man rule (Acts 14:23)

  • No apostle ever stopped someone from marrying or having children

  • The early church shared resources, respected conscience, and sought unityโ€”not forced submission

++ Apostle Paul: Servant Leader, Not Spiritual Dictator

โ€œNot that we lord it over your faith, but we work with you for your joy.โ€
โ€”2 Corinthians 1:24
โ€œFollow me as I follow Christ.โ€ โ€”1 Corinthians 11:1

  • Paul never demanded blind loyalty

  • He urged others to follow Christ, not his own personality

  • He worked โ€œwithโ€ people, not over them

  • He taught mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21), not enforced hierarchy

++ The Bottom Line:

Top-down authority that:

  • Demands loyalty

  • Controls life decisions

  • Discourages critical thinking

  • Shuns non-conformers

โ€ฆis not biblical.
Itโ€™s manmade religion, often veiled in spiritual language.

ย Godโ€™s Government = Servant Leadership + Personal Responsibility

โ€œLet each one be fully persuaded in his own mind.โ€ โ€”Romans 14:5
โ€œStand fastโ€ฆ and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.โ€ โ€”Galatians 5:1

++ True authority walks with you.

It never forces its way over you.

Closing : When the Ministry Becomes the Master

When Discernment Becomes Control

MAKING THIS POINT
What Is Charismatic Witchcraft?

โ€œRebellion is as the sin of witchcraftโ€ฆโ€ โ€”1 Samuel 15:23
โ€œHaving a form of godliness but denying its powerโ€ฆโ€ โ€”2 Timothy 3:5

Witchcraft isnโ€™t just spells or sรฉances.
Itโ€™s any effort to manipulate, dominate, or control others outside of Godโ€™s Spirit.

When leaders use prophecy, discernment, or โ€œapostolic authorityโ€ to:

  • Spy on hearts without relationship

  • Shame people into submission

  • Micromanage marriages, rest, or family decisions

  • Claim divine rank over a region

โ€ฆitโ€™s not prophetic. Itโ€™s oppressive.

POINT:ย  Jesus Doesnโ€™t Spyโ€”He Serves.

โ€œThe good shepherd knows his sheep, and his sheep know him.โ€ โ€”John 10:14

Real Christian leaders walk with people. They donโ€™t lord over them.
Jesus didnโ€™t need secret discernment gamesโ€”He asked questions, shared meals, and walked beside people.

If your discernment leads you to suspicion, not compassionโ€ฆ
If your leadership isolates you from the flock, not toward itโ€ฆ
Youโ€™re not operating in Christโ€™s spirit.

Recognizing Spirit Of Authoritarian Domination toย  Control

  • One person (or apostolic group) controls the ministry

  • Others must โ€œsubmitโ€ to them to be blessed or safe

  • Control over peopleโ€™s marriages, families, rest, even childbearing

  • Shame and spiritual threats if they leave or disagree

A couple I met told me they werenโ€™t allowed to marry until age 46 and werenโ€™t given a single day off in 20 years.
Their apostle told the entire church to postpone children so as not to “hinder his ministry.”

This is not pastoral care.
Thatโ€™s bondage.

Where as Servant leader Christ said:ย ย 

โ€œYou know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over themโ€ฆ Not so with you.โ€ โ€”Matthew 20:25โ€“26

  • Jesus never micromanaged peopleโ€™s lives

  • He invited, not dominated

  • He washed feet, not demanded status

ย Paul Said:

โ€œNot that we lord it over your faith, but we work with you for your joy.โ€ โ€”2 Corinthians 1:24
โ€œFollow me as I follow Christ.โ€ โ€”1 Corinthians 11:1

  • Paul never enforced personal control

  • He respected freedom of conscience (Romans 14)

  • He welcomed accountability (Acts 17:11)

Inย  The Early First Church (Acts):

  • Shared leadership (Acts 14:23)

  • No forced loyalty or hierarchy

  • Discernment was relational, not psychic

  • The Holy Spirit led individuals directly (Acts 13:2, Acts 15:28)

ย What Top-Down Churches Violate:

Biblical Principle Top-Down Church Practice
Free will (Gal. 5:1) Forced submission
Servant leadership (Matt. 20:26) Spiritual elitism
Discernment through relationship Psychic-style โ€œreadingโ€
Mutual honor (Rom. 12:10) Hierarchical control
Conscience before God (Rom. 14:5) Human micromanagement

ย Final Thought:

Jesus came to set the captives freeโ€”not create new religious chains.
True apostolic leadership reflects the humility, patience, and compassion of Christ.
It invites people to follow Himโ€”not manipulate them into following you.

If youโ€™ve been under spiritual control: Jesus sees. Jesus frees.

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI


Discover more from PURPOSE OF THIS MINISTRY AI + I SITE

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply