1. The Nature of a God-Called Mission

A. God Calls for Restoration, Not Destruction

• Galatians 6:1 (KJV) – “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness.”
  ++ True godly correction aims for RESTORATION, not entertainment, humiliation, or viral fame.

• Matthew 18:15-17 (KJV) – Jesus’ process of correction is private first, public only if necessary.++ These gossip ministries skip the private step and rush to public exposure for views.

B. Biblical Examples of Private Sin Handling

• Noah’s Sin and Ham’s Dishonor

  • Genesis 9:20-27 (KJV) – Noah was drunk and exposed. Ham spread the news instead of covering his father’s shame.

  • His brothers, Shem and Japheth, covered him without looking.

  • Ham was cursed for dishonoring his father.
    ++ Lesson – Exposing a leader’s private sin instead of handling it with discretion brings judgment, not blessing.

• David and Saul

  • 1 Samuel 24:6 (KJV) – “The LORD forbid that I should do this thing unto my master, the LORD’s anointed, to stretch forth mine hand against him.”

  • Even when Saul was unrighteous, David refused to attack or expose him.++ Lesson – Even an unrighteous leader is in God’s hands, not ours, for judgment.

2. Airing Leaked Clips, Secret Videos – Biblical or Slander?

A. God Hates Secret Whispers & Spying on Others

• Proverbs 6:16-19 (KJV) – God hates those who “sow discord among brethren.”

• Proverbs 11:13 (KJV) – “A talebearer revealeth secrets: but he that is of a faithful spirit concealeth the matter.”
  ++ Leaking private recordings and exposing ministers is gossip, not discernment.

B. Satan is Called ‘The Accuser of the Brethren’

• Revelation 12:10 (KJV) – Satan is the one who accuses God’s people day and night.
  ++ Are these exposé ministries acting like Christ—or like Satan, the Accuser?

3. The Hypocrisy of Scandal-Based Ministries

A. Those Who Expose Others Often Fall Themselves

• Matthew 7:3-5 (KJV) – Jesus warns against focusing on others’ sins while ignoring personal faults.

• Romans 2:1 (KJV) – “Thou that judgest doest the same things.”
  ++ Many Christian YouTubers and influencers who attacked others have later been exposed themselves.

B. Profiting Off of Scandal

• Many of these channels monetize their content—is this righteous correction or profiting off gossip?

• 1 Timothy 6:5 (KJV) warns against those who see godliness as gain (profit).
  ++ True prophetic ministry does not operate like a Christian TMZ gossip business.

4. How Should Christians Respond to a Fallen Leader?

A. If They Are in Unrepentant Sin

1. Follow Matthew 18:15-17 (KJV) – Go to them privately first.

2. 1 Timothy 5:19-20 (KJV) – Public rebuke should only happen with multiple witnesses (not secret leaked clips).

B. If They Have Already Repented

• Isaiah 43:25 (KJV) – “I, even I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions, and will not remember thy sins.”
  ++ If God has forgiven a 25-year-old sin, why are Christians still exposing it?

• Micah 7:18-19 (KJV) – “He will cast all their sins into the depths of the sea.”
  ++ Are scandal exposé ministries fishing sins out of the sea that God already forgave?

Final Conclusion: Scandal Exposure Ministries Are NOT a Noble, God-Called Work

1. They act like modern-day Pharisees – focusing on public shame rather than biblical restoration.

2. They operate like worldly gossip media – using scandal for views, likes, and monetization.

3. They break biblical protocol – skipping private correction and rushing to public judgment.

4. They fall into the sin of slander and talebearing – which the Bible clearly condemns.

5. They do not reflect Christ’s heart – He sought repentance and restoration, not public destruction.

++ A true God-called ministry does not thrive on Christian TMZ-style gossip, but on biblical truth, love, and restoration.

James 2:13 (KJV)

“For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.”

++ Final Thought: Those who expose others without mercy will be judged without mercy themselves.

The biblical account of Noah’s sin and how his sons responded provides a powerful lesson in contrast to the modern trend of Christian scandal-exposing ministries that publicly air others’ sins for views and influence.

1. Noah’s Sin and His Sons’ Responses

Genesis 9:20-27 (KJV)

“And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness.”

Key Takeaways:

1. Noah’s private failure – He became drunk and lay uncovered in his tent, a personal failure, not a public sin.

2. Ham’s response – Instead of covering his father’s shame, he broadcasted it to others.

3. Shem and Japheth’s response – They covered Noah’s nakedness with respect, without looking upon his shame.

4. The consequence – Ham’s dishonor led to a generational curse, while Shem and Japheth received blessings.

2. Modern “Christian” Gossip Ministries vs. Biblical Teaching

Airing Dirty Laundry for Clicks

Many self-proclaimed “discernment” or “exposing” ministries function as modern-day Ham:

• They publicly spread Christian leaders’ sins, weaknesses, or personal failures.

• They monetize scandal, turning it into a form of entertainment.

• They vilify without restoration, often acting without relationship, accountability, or biblical confrontation

.

How This Contradicts Biblical Principles

A. Proverbs 11:13 (KJV) – Keeping Confidence

“A talebearer revealeth secrets: but he that is of a faithful spirit concealeth the matter.”

• The Bible calls revealing others’ faults talebearing (gossip), not discernment.

• A faithful spirit seeks to restore, not destroy.

B. Matthew 18:15-17 (KJV) – Biblical Confrontation

“Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.”

• Jesus commanded private confrontation first before public exposure.

• Scandal ministries skip this process and go straight to public shaming.

C. Galatians 6:1 (KJV) – Restoration, Not Destruction

“Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.”

• Restoration is the biblical goal, not tearing down.

• A spirit of meekness is required, not prideful exposure.

3. The Motives Behind Exposing Others

While some claim they expose others for truth’s sake, the following motives are often at play:

A. Financial Gain

• Many exposure ministries make thousands off monetized scandal videos, articles, and donations.

• Is it about truth, or profit from another’s shame?

B. Self-Righteousness & Pride

• They position themselves as the standard of holiness, yet often refuse accountability.

• Luke 18:11 (KJV) – The Pharisee boasted about his righteousness while condemning others.

C. Hidden Sin in Their Own Lives

• Matthew 7:3-5 (KJV) warns against focusing on another’s faults while ignoring your own.

• Many “exposers” have later been caught in the same sins they exposed in others.

4. Jesus’ Example: Mercy Over Exposure

The Woman Caught in Adultery (John 8:1-11, KJV)

• The Pharisees publicly exposed a woman’s sin, but Jesus responded with mercy and wisdom.

• He did not justify her sin but told her “go, and sin no more”—a balance of truth and grace.

5. Conclusion: Be Like Shem & Japheth, Not Ham

In today’s digital age, we must ask: Are we covering or exposing?

• Covering sin does not mean justifying it but handling it biblically and with love.

• Many so-called “discernment ministries” resemble Ham, delighting in exposure rather than restoration.

• True biblical correction is private first, public only when necessary, and always with the goal of redemption, not destruction.

Final Word:
“Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.” – Matthew 5:7 (KJV)

Social media today is a double-edged sword in the realm of accountability versus gossip. It offers unprecedented opportunities for transparency and community engagement, but its very nature can also turn accountability into a public spectacle—something far removed from the biblical model of correction and restoration.

1. The Potential for Positive Accountability

A. Transparency and Immediate Communication

• Rapid Dissemination: Social media can quickly spread important information, making it a valuable tool when urgent action is required—especially in cases of clear abuse or ongoing harm.

• Community Mobilization: Platforms allow believers to organize, share verified information, and support those who have been hurt. This can be a form of modern accountability if used responsibly.

B. Engaging in Constructive Dialogue

• Building Relationships: When used correctly, social media can foster a space for constructive discussion, prayer, and a call to repentance—all aligned with the biblical mandate to reprove sin (cf. Ephesians 5:11) in a way that seeks restoration.

• Educational Outreach: Churches and responsible leaders can use social media to educate their communities about proper accountability measures, emphasizing confidentiality, evidence, and the need for internal church discipline (Matthew 18:15‑17).

2. The Pitfalls of Social Media Misuse

A. The Rise of Sensationalism and Gossip

• Gossip Ministries vs. Godly Accountability: Many modern “gossip ministries,” podcasts, and viral videos use social media to sensationalize and expose personal failures for profit or revenge. This approach starkly contrasts with the biblical call for discreet, restorative correction.

• Public Shaming: When social media is used to publicly shame leaders without proper evidence or following the biblical process, it tends to promote division, foster a culture of judgment, and damage the overall witness of the church.

B. Lack of Context and Evidence

• Fragmented Narratives: Social media often presents isolated clips or snippets without context, leading to hasty judgments that ignore the complexity of sin, repentance, and restoration.

• Accountability Without Oversight: Unlike the careful, evidence-based approach advocated in Scripture (1 Timothy 5:19‑20), many social media platforms lack the oversight and discernment found in a trusted church community.

3. A Biblical Approach to Social Media Use

A. Upholding the Principles of Restoration

• Private Correction First:

  • The biblical process (Matthew 18:15‑17) calls for addressing sin privately before any public discussion. A responsible use of social media would respect this process, sharing concerns only when internal avenues have been exhausted and after thorough verification.

• Focus on Healing, Not Humiliation:

  • Ephesians 5:11 instructs believers to reprove sin rather than be in fellowship with “works of darkness.” This means that any public exposure must be carried out with the intent to restore rather than to humiliate or seek revenge.

B. Community and Church Leadership

• Internal Channels Over Public Platforms:

  • When issues arise, the church’s leadership should be the primary avenue for accountability, not the court of public opinion on social media. Leaders and elders are best equipped to discern the truth and administer discipline in a loving manner.

• Responsibility in Digital Engagement:

  • Christians are called to be “salt and light” (Matthew 5:13‑16), which means using social media to encourage, edify, and bring healing—not to engage in scandal or sensationalism that tarnishes the witness of Christ.

4. Striking a Balance in the Digital Age

In our media-saturated age, the challenge is to harness the benefits of social media while avoiding its pitfalls. This involves:

• Developing a Discernment Culture:
  Encouraging believers to seek context, verify sources, and avoid knee-jerk reactions when engaging with scandalous content online.

• Promoting Responsible Leadership:
  Church leaders can use their platforms to model how to address sin responsibly, emphasizing biblical processes of accountability and restoration rather than public shaming.

• Engaging with Compassion:
  Even when social media exposes wrongdoing, the goal must remain reconciliation and healing, not retribution or viral fame. Genuine repentance and transformation should be the objective, echoing Christ’s call to “go, and sin no more.”

Conclusion

While social media has the power to amplify voices for justice and accountability, its misuse can quickly slide into the realm of gossip and public scandal. The biblical approach—rooted in discreet, loving correction aimed at restoration—provides a stark contrast to the sensationalism prevalent in many modern gossip ministries. By upholding these principles, Christians can navigate the digital landscape in a way that honors both the truth of the Gospel and the dignity of every person involved.

To Support [wpedon id=”25831″]