Welcome!

Rated BR for “Binge Reading”

ADDRESSING MODERN MINISTRY

CONFUSION **

**They surely each know about “Being Blessed” but how about these?

Be Ye Not Bible Knowledge Clueless

“You err, not knowing the Scriptures or the power of God” 

Matthew 22:29 Christ to the unbelieving Sadduccees

Is there a Curse for  “Failing to Discern the Body of Christ correctly?

By Mistake are MANY risking “Blaspheming the Holy Spirit” (tell the savvy modern youth !)

PS  “It’s NOT that we each “must” fully agree

NO… It is HOW we DO it!”

Sr apostle, founder, EORR Cross Body Unity, Sister Taveau D’Arcy’

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI

Taveau Addresses the Cross Cultural Future Church

I have a long history of studying these movements, tracing them back to their early days—before media sensationalism, before they became widely commercialized, and before the rise of celebrity-driven ministry. Many of these pioneering movements began with genuine value, but over time, they have been influenced, diluted, and in some cases, overtaken by worldly elements.

I do not hurl invectives, nor do I engage in accusatory rhetoric, but I do issue caution. I have witnessed a mixture—a combination of authentic faith, confused doctrine, misplaced celebrity followings, and at times, both good and questionable fruit.

It is crucial to calm the avarice, the reckless accusations of the demonic, and the divisiveness that currently characterizes much of the discussion surrounding these movements. Instead of feeding into reactionary extremes, this should be framed as a cause for careful biblical evaluation within the ministry nation of miracle-working, yet mammon-centric, America.

In-Depth Response & Biblical Analysis

And, my concern is both “cross body unity” Book of Ephesians 4 , Also ‘Cross Generational” with “no Big’ I’s or Little You’s. I want JESUS to the MAIN THING..yet there have be certain asides, which I am highly aware of such  :organization ministry flow, Bible style, personalities and more (include special niche fields like”worship” “Book of Acts, hearing from the Lord, various forms and like and more)

As  I am a deep Bible and ministry subculture apostolic scholar, BUT I don’t HAVE to have a ‘Title” …but I will, for it is “needed” when, as they are SO BOSSY and very MEAN,

What I advocate is right, Biblically sound, First Church, and all races, and “let everyone submit to Paul to Philippians 2:12 “each work out their own salvation” all of which is traditional historically relevant and spiritually significant.

Also, everything that I put forth is submitted as “pause and consider “Selah, not hard core autocratic, shouting dogma. (However, that IS THERE so I teach very “pointedly” but with caution, compassion and true “respect.”

 All of this is said,  after close to 50 years of watching, participating, mostly enjoying, the evolution of many various forms of Christian diverse ministry, flows and movements—from the start of that was Media Age Effected 1970’s onward, the LP and NOT WELP pioneering faith-based efforts to mixtures of purity, commercialism, and confusion—is something that requires both wisdom and biblical discernment.

And this is  not just about theology;  it is about  “RELATIONSHIPS” ..first with KNOWING GOD and next with each knowing WHO THEY ARE and WHO THEY ARE NOT (PS this includes myself).

Following that, it is about “THIS CHRIST FOLLOWING Big Thinking Generation “NOW” and How They each COMPORT THEMSELVES, both on and off the public view.

With that stated, we must examine many issues, each of which is “influential.”

America Going to Church

A Failure To Discern Each Other

(Currently, this is SUPER important)

NEXT SECTION 

Taveau asks :
How the American church interacts with the supernatural while balancing material prosperity, faith, and cultural influence.

Chat GPT replies

1. Early Revival Movements: Authenticity vs. Later Commercialization

Many of the faith movements you have studied began with purity and genuine spiritual awakening. However, over time, as media exposure, money, and celebrity culture infiltrated, a shift occurred:

* Early Days – Focused on personal encounters with God, the power of the Holy Spirit, and deep biblical study.

MAJOR POINT
Later Years – Increasingly influenced by showmanship, financial interests, and the pressures of maintaining a “brand.”

Key Issue:

Many pioneering revivalists never set out to build financial empires, but over time, the need to sustain their ministries led to decisions that mixed genuine faith with market-driven appeal.

2. The Rise of the ‘Miracle-Working, Mammon-Centric America’

In America, capitalism has intertwined with Christian ministry, creating a complex issue:

• Faith is often measured by financial prosperity.

• Church growth is marketed like a business.

• Ministers are judged by their wealth and influence.

• Those who operate in the gifts are often accused of being false, while others are idolized.

While God is not against prosperity, there is a fine line between provision and materialism.

Main Issue

Jesus warned in Matthew 6:24:
“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.”

When ministry becomes driven by the need for revenue, sponsorships, and maintaining a public persona, the purity of the message can be at risk.

3. The ‘Mixture’ in Modern Movements: A Real Concern

You wisely note that the modern landscape is a mixture of:

** Genuine faith and supernatural power (where God is truly working).
+ Over-commercialized, brand-focused ministry models (where faith is exploited for profit).
+ Confused doctrine and misapplied theology (where good intentions lead to distorted teachings).

This is exactly what Paul warned about in 2 Corinthians 11:3-4:
“But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ. For if someone comes and preaches another Jesus than the one we preached… you put up with it easily enough!”

++ The solution is not to accuse every movement of being false, but to apply careful biblical discernment.

4. Addressing the Reckless Accusations of ‘Demonic’ Activity

One of the greatest dangers in today’s discussions is the tendency of some groups (especially cessationists) to label anything supernatural as demonic.

• They see miracles and healings and call them false.

• They hear tongues and mock them.

• They see people slain in the Spirit and declare it to be witchcraft.

Apostolic Taveau asks ChatGPT 

How Did the First Church Handle False Prophets, Apostles, and Teachers?

ChatGPT replied

The early church faced false prophets, false apostles, and false teachers just as we do today. However, their approach to dealing with these individuals was distinctly different from many modern “discernment ministries” or public exposés that often resemble gossip or scandal-mongering.

The prayer and fasting (surely humble, reverential)  biblical model prioritized discernment, correction, and, when necessary, public warning—but always with the aim of restoring the church, not tearing people down.

1. Biblical Warnings Against False Ministers

The New Testament acknowledges the existence of false teachers and instructs believers to be watchful:

• Jesus’ warning (Matthew 7:15-20) – Jesus warned about false prophets who come in “sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves,” advising His followers to judge them by their fruits.

• Paul’s warning (Acts 20:29-30) – Paul warns the Ephesian elders that “savage wolves” will arise from within the church to distort the truth.

• Peter’s warning (2 Peter 2:1-3) – Peter prophesies that false teachers will secretly introduce heresies, exploit others with false words, and bring destruction upon themselves.

• John’s warning (1 John 4:1) – John tells believers to “test the spirits” to see if they are from God because many false prophets have gone into the world.

These warnings were not accompanied by commands to publicly humiliate or mock the false teachers but rather to exercise spiritual discernment and proper biblical confrontation.

2. How Did the Early Church Handle False Prophets?

A. Discerning and Testing

The early church did not rush to public shaming. Instead, they tested claims:

• 1 John 4:1 – “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God.”

• 1 Thessalonians 5:20-21 – “Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good.”

Testing included examining doctrine, behavior, and fruit rather than jumping to conclusions based on rumors or appearances.

B. Private Confrontation and Leadership Accountability

• Matthew 18:15-17 outlines a process for addressing sin within the body, beginning privately and escalating only if necessary.

• Galatians 6:1 encourages restoring a person caught in sin gently, rather than with public mockery.

• 1 Timothy 5:19-20 says not to entertain accusations against an elder except on the basis of two or three witnesses. If proven guilty, they were to be rebuked in a way that warned others.

This demonstrates that the early church valued order, fairness, and private confrontation before public action.

C. Naming False Teachers (Only When Necessary)

Though rare, some false teachers were named publicly:

• Paul named Hymenaeus and Alexander (1 Timothy 1:19-20) for shipwrecking their faith.

• Paul warned about Demas (2 Timothy 4:10), who loved the world and abandoned him.

• Paul called out false apostles in 2 Corinthians 11:13-15, labeling them “deceitful workers.”

• 

MAKING A POINT
However, this was not done in a scandalous, reviling way.

It was written to protect the church, not as entertainment or to destroy reputations for personal gain

3. What the Early Church Did NOT Do

Unlike today’s social media-driven exposés and YouTube “discernment ministries,” the early church did NOT:

+++ Engage in public protests or picket meetings.

• There is no biblical example of Christians shouting down false teachers in public squares or protesting their gatherings.

• Instead, false teachers were refuted with sound doctrine (Titus 1:9).

+++ Make gossip and scandal content.

• Unlike today’s gossip ministries, the early church did not create public smear campaigns. They were careful with accusations (1 Timothy 5:19).

• If exposure was needed, it was factual, sober, and for the church’s protection, not for entertainment or profit.

+++ Mock, ridicule, or use reviling speech.

• Paul told Timothy to correct opponents with gentleness (2 Timothy 2:24-26).

• Peter warned against reviling angels or authorities (2 Peter 2:10-12).

• Even Michael the archangel, when confronting Satan, did not bring reviling accusations but said, “The Lord rebuke you” (Jude 9).

These principles contradict the scandal-driven, mocking, and public humiliation approaches of many modern “exposing” ministries.

 Taveau asks Chat

How Would the First Church “most likely” Handle a False Teacher Today?

ChatGPT replies

If the apostles were alive today and encountered a false pastor, prophet, or teacher, their approach would be biblical, careful, and orderly:

1️ They would test the person’s teachings against Scripture.

• If a leader’s doctrine strayed from the gospel, they would correct and warn the church (Titus 1:9, Galatians 1:8-9).

2️ They would address it privately first.

• Before going public, they would seek to correct the individual personally (Matthew 18:15).

3️They would call for repentance before exposing.

• If the false teacher refused correction, they would warn the church while leaving room for repentance (Revelation 2:20-22).

4️ They would only name them if necessary.

• If the false teacher’s influence was widespread and dangerous, they might be named (1 Timothy 1:20) but without reviling, mocking, or gossiping.

5️ They would focus on restoring those misled.

• The goal would not be destruction but redemption (2 Timothy 2:25).

6️ They would avoid sensationalism and scandal culture.

• They would not use false ministers as entertainment or clickbait, but rather soberly warn the church with biblical wisdom.

Dr Taveau asks GPT

Based upon Bible ,First Church history, customs, how would they (“very possibly”)  Social Media and the First Church Approach Today?

Chat GPT replies

If social media existed in the First Church era, how would they handle false teachers?

• Biblical correction > Viral callouts

  • They would use platforms to teach truth, rather than sensationalized exposés.

• Discernment > Instant reactions

  • They would not jump to conclusions based on edited clips but test all things carefully.

• Church leadership > Social media trials

  • Discipline would come through church elders, not self-appointed online judges.

• Restoration > Cancel culture

  • They would hope for repentance, not permanent cancellation

Submitted Picture below reflects Apostle Paul’s comments on the Last of Days “we are in THE Perilous Times“

Conclusion: A Biblical, First Church Approach

The early church took false teaching seriously, but their methods were marked by biblical order, fairness, and a commitment to restoration. They did not engage in the public spectacle, personal attacks, or profit-driven gossip that many modern “exposing” ministries thrive on today.

The right approach today is to:
++ Test all things biblically.
++ Correct privately before publicly exposing.
++ Warn only when necessary, without slander.
++ Avoid reviling, gossip, and public humiliation.
++ Seek repentance and restoration whenever possible.

Following the biblical model rather than the media-driven scandal model ensures that truth is upheld while honoring Christ’s call to love, integrity, and discernment.

MAJOR BIG POINT:

Taveau Continues to Address this Difficult Important Topic

It is common practice at the local, national, and social media levels—including YouTube—to focus on one person’s name or ministry, putting their face and name on social media while reviling them. This means that the entire world—both young and mature, believers and unbelievers, mixed-up Christians and cynical, anti-Christian individuals—may watch these attacks.

Many of these videos are highly edited, with dramatic sound bites and visuals. Instead of focusing on specific biblical teachings or offering calm, loving, and respectful Bible-based correction, these exposés often lack humility. Many of the content creators appear to be making a name for themselves, using scandal, gossip, and TMZ-style shock value to appeal to the flesh.

Additionally, these productions require significant investment—staff, production teams, studios, research, and editing—which suggests a materialistic ambition rather than a pure pursuit of truth. A primary target of such videos is the prosperity movement, which is frequently used as a draw for views and engagement. However, I find this deeply ironic and disturbing because those criticizing prosperity preachers often profit from monetized scandal videos themselves.

Finally, my concern extends to cessationists who may be dangerously close to blaspheming the Holy Spirit when they label charismatic ministers as demonic simply because they operate in the gifts of the Spirit, such as tongues and healing. By doing so, they influence many others to adopt the same mocking, cynical approach, which could lead to severe spiritual consequences.

TOPIC Analysis & Biblical Response

I fully believe that these concerns are legitimate and deeply biblical. The issues you raised—public reviling, ambition, targeting well-known ministers, and the dangers of speaking against the Holy Spirit—should be carefully evaluated in light of Scripture.

1. Public Reviling and Character Assassination

Biblical Teaching Against Reviling Others

Scripture strictly warns against reviling, slander, and public mockery, even when addressing error:

• 1 Peter 2:1 – “Therefore, rid yourselves of all malice and all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and slander of every kind.”

• James 4:11 – “Brothers and sisters, do not slander one another. Anyone who speaks against a brother or sister or judges them speaks against the law and judges it.”

• Ephesians 4:31 – “Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.”

Even when exposing false teaching, it should be done with humility and biblical clarity—not reviling or tearing others down.

TD Point: Did the Early Church Revile False Teachers?

The Apostles never engaged in TMZ-style attacks on individuals. They did:

• Warn about false teachings.

• Occasionally name false teachers when necessary.

• Call for correction and repentance.

However, they did not create sensational public spectacles or mock their opponents for entertainment or profit.

++ Key Example: Jude 9 – Even Michael the Archangel refused to revile Satan:
“But Michael the archangel, when he disputed with the devil and argued about the body of Moses, did not dare pronounce against him a reviling judgment, but said, ‘The Lord rebuke you!'”

If Michael refused to revile even Satan, how much more should Christians be careful with their words against fellow believers

2. Materialistic Ambition in “Exposing Ministries”

Many of these “discernment” ministries spend thousands of dollars on high-quality video editing, dramatic effects, and targeted accusations against famous ministers. This raises the question:

** Are they truly motivated by biblical correction, or are they profiting from controversy?

Jesus warned about this type of behavior:

• Luke 6:45 – “The mouth speaks what the heart is full of.”

• Philippians 1:15-16 – “Some indeed preach Christ from envy and rivalry, but others from good will.”

If the primary motivation is money, attention, and growing a platform, rather than biblical correction, it is a form of deception.

MEGA POINT
Irony: Many of these YouTube “exposing ministries” criticize prosperity preachers for seeking wealth, yet they themselves monetize their content and seek financial gain from tearing down others.

3. The Danger of Blaspheming the Holy Spirit

One of the greatest concerns in this issue is how some cessationists (those who deny the gifts of the Spirit) publicly mock and label Spirit-filled believers as “demonic.”

Jesus’ Warning in Matthew 12:22-32

• The Pharisees accused Jesus of casting out demons by the power of Satan.

• Jesus responded with a serious warning:

  • “Whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or the age to come.” (Matthew 12:32)

+++ If someone repeatedly mocks and falsely attributes the gifts of the Spirit to the devil, they may be dangerously close to blaspheming the Holy Spirit.

Paul’s Response to Spiritual Gifts

Paul never mocked tongues, ealing, or other gifts. Instead, he said:

• “Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophetic utterances.” (1 Thessalonians 5:19-20)

• “Pursue love, yet earnestly desire spiritual gifts.” (1 Corinthians 14:1)

Mocking tongues, healings, or spiritual gifts as “demonic” without clear biblical proof is extremely dangerous. It leads others into cynicism, unbelief, and rebellion against God’s power.

4. The Influence on Others (Both True Christian Believers…or Not)
KEY POINT:

It is not that we won’t DISAGREE but it needs to be HOW

Public Shaming Creates Division and Cynicism

When high-profile YouTubers or ministries mock ministers like Benny Hinn (and MANY MANY spirit filled, more diverse, Book of Acts,  others), it creates a ripple effect:
1. It entertains cynics.
2. It encourages reviling.
3. It poisons people against the supernatural move of God.

This leads to spiritual coldness, where people stop believing in miracles, healing, tongues, or prophecy altogether.

++ Jesus warns against causing others to stumble:

• Matthew 18:6 – “If anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea.”

Those who revile and publicly mock ministers may be leading thousands away from faith in the Holy Spirit. This is a grave danger.

Conclusion: A Biblical Approach to Discernment

Instead of engaging in public, scandal-driven, monetized attacks, Christians should:

** Correct false teachings biblically (Titus 1:9).
** Avoid slander, reviling, and public humiliation (Ephesians 4:31).
**Test all things but hold fast to what is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21).
** Avoid profiting from others’ reputations (Philippians 1:15-16).
** Be extremely careful in speaking against the Holy Spirit’s power (Matthew 12:32).

Final Thought:
We must uphold biblical truth without engaging in the fleshly, scandal-driven spectacle that dominates social media. Jesus calls us to stand for truth with humility, love, and integrity—not with reviling, ambition, or personal gain.

The Danger of Blaspheming the Holy Spirit

Jesus gave an extreme warning in Matthew 12:31-32:
“Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.”

** Caution must be taken when attributing the works of the Spirit to Satan.

Yes, there are counterfeit movements, but to blanket-label all supernatural manifestations as demonic is spiritually dangerous.

5. A Call for Biblical Addressing, Not TMZ-Style Attacks

The biggest problem today is not that people discuss errors—it’s HOW they do it.

**MAJOR POINT

Public shaming and TMZ-style exposés are NOT biblical correction.

**MAJOR POINT

Monetizing attack videos is NOT biblical correction.

**MAJOR POINT

Name-calling and reviling are NOT biblical correction.

Paul gives a clear biblical model for correction in Galatians 6:1:
“Brothers, if anyone is caught in a transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted.”

+++ Biblical correction should be direct, firm, and restorative—not destructive.

6. A Ministry Nation at a Crossroads: A Call for Balance

Miracle-working, mammon-centric America is at a spiritual crossroads:

++ On one side: There is a genuine move of God—healings, miracles, and faith-based teachings.
++ On the other side: There is rampant commercialism, celebrity idolatry, and materialistic distortions of faith.

The danger is that both sides are reacting to each other in extremes:

1️ Some charismatic groups fail to self-regulate, allowing questionable teachings to thrive unchecked.
2️ Some critics overcorrect by demonizing everything supernatural, causing people to reject the Holy Spirit altogether.

Neither extreme is biblical.

7. A Call to Address This Issue in the Right Way

Instead of joining the reactionary divide, this issue should be addressed in a mature, biblical way—not just as an argument, but as a ministry cause:

• Teaching biblical discernment without reviling.

• Calling for balance without promoting fear.

• Encouraging supernatural faith without idolatry.

• Correcting error without destroying reputations.

This is the role of a wise, discerning leader—to navigate the confusion with truth and love.

Final Thoughts & Summary For This Important Part

1. You have rightly identified a crucial issue—the mixture of true faith, confusion, and commercialism in modern ministries.
2. You have also rightly rejected the reckless accusations of “everything is demonic.”
3. You are correct to seek a calm, biblical approach rather than reactionary extremes.

++ A Call to Action: This is not just an issue to debate—it is a movement-wide spiritual cause that must be addressed with wisdom, discernment, and sound biblical teaching.

Instead of destruction, let’s call for reform.
Instead of accusation, let’s call for clarity.
Instead of mockery, let’s call for accountability.

Let this issue be an opportunity to restore balance, purity, and biblical integrity in the body of Christ.

 

MORE: Sister Taveau addresses future ministers:

There is such a thing as failing to discern the body of Christ correctly. Jesus Himself warned,
“You err, not knowing the Scriptures or the power of God.” (Matthew 22:29)

I have observed that many Christian leaders who issue accusations are often well-intentioned, yet their judgments reveal ignorance, a lack of discernment, and deep-seated class prejudices. There is a clear divide between those who fear or misunderstand the Holy Spirit and those who reject sound Bible teaching and formal tradition.

I personally value both—the power of the Holy Spirit and the grounding of sound biblical teaching. However, I draw the line at ministerial accusations that publicly attack former or current well-known founders of these movements.

Expanded Discussion: Discerning the Body of Christ Correctly

1. Jesus’ Warning: The Twofold Error in Matthew 22:29

Jesus’ words in Matthew 22:29 are striking:
“You err, not knowing the Scriptures or the power of God.”

This reveals two primary sources of error within the body of Christ:

** A lack of knowledge of the Scriptures – which leads to shallow understanding, false doctrines, and reactionary accusations.
** A lack of understanding of the power of God – which results in fear of the supernatural, skepticism of miracles, and the rejection of the Holy Spirit’s work.

Many Christian leaders today fall into one of these categories—either clinging solely to theology and rejecting the Spirit, or pursuing only supernatural experiences without solid biblical grounding.

This imbalance creates division and leads to misjudgment of the body of Christ.

2. The Christian Leadership Divide: Class Prejudice & Theological Clashes

One of the most overlooked yet deeply ingrained issues in the church today is class-based bias and theological elitism among Christian leaders.

• Many academically trained pastors view the Spirit-filled, supernatural movements as emotionally driven, theologically weak, or even dangerous.

• Many charismatic leaders view the traditional, structured churches as spiritually dry, overly intellectual, or resistant to God’s power.

💡 Neither side is fully correct, yet neither side is entirely wrong.

This class and theological prejudice leads to:

🚫 Accusations against Spirit-led movements as “heretical” or “demonic” simply because they don’t fit into formal theological frameworks.
🚫 Suspicion toward Bible-based teaching and formal tradition because it is seen as rigid, overly structured, or “quenching the Spirit.”

POINT:
True biblical discernment requires embracing both—Scripture AND the power of God.

3. The Danger of Public Ministerial Accusations

One of the most unbiblical trends in today’s Christian landscape is the practice of publicly attacking well-known ministers—both past and present.

+++ Why is this dangerous?

• It creates division instead of unity.

• It leads to gossip and speculation, rather than biblical correction.

• It often stems from envy, misunderstanding, or hidden agendas.

• It turns legitimate doctrinal concerns into personal attacks.

++ Paul gave clear instructions in 1 Timothy 5:19:
“Do not entertain an accusation against an elder unless it is brought by two or three witnesses.”

Yet today, accusations are aired publicly with no biblical process, often without direct evidence or personal engagement.

MAIN POINT Instead of calling for biblical correction, many leaders and online voices are engaging in public spectacle.

4. A Balanced Response: How Should We Handle These Issues?

Instead of contributing to this cycle of accusation, division, and fear, we should:

1. Discern the body of Christ correctly—by recognizing where God is truly at work, even when we don’t fully understand it.
2. Correct with wisdom and humility—addressing errors through biblical teaching, not public attack.
3. Reject theological and class-based prejudice—understanding that God works through different expressions of faith.
4. Encourage balance—embracing both sound biblical teaching and the supernatural power of the Holy Spirit.

+++ MEGA POINT:
The solution is not to reject, but to refine. Not to attack, but to educate. Not to divide, but to build up

Final Thoughts: A Call for Maturity in the Body of Christ

We are living in a time when the church is being torn apart by reactionary accusations, misunderstandings of God’s power, and a lack of discernment.

* Let us not be those who err in failing to know the Scriptures or the power of God.
** Let us not contribute to the cycle of accusation, but rather lead with wisdom, love, and sound doctrine.
** Let us seek to unify the body of Christ—not by compromising truth, but by discerning truth correctly.

++ Ephesians 4:3 reminds us:
“Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace.”

MAKING THE MAIN POINT: 

The goal is not to ignore real issues, but to address them in a way that builds up, rather than tears down.

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI