TAVEAU CREATIVE LEADERSHIP

MINISTRY AI AND I

PART 1 of 4 Christian Ministries

Views of Christian Women

Ministry Double Standard  #2 :  Eli & Sons VS Christ

The Tale of 2 Ministry Virtues
“It was the Best of Times, and the Worst of Times”

 “Now Eli was very old, and heard all that his sons did unto all Israel; and how they lay with the women that assembled at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.” 1 Samuel 2:22 High Mega LP Office

“For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”Paul Galatians 3:27-28 

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved under international copyright laws,in conjunction with AI

ELI & SONS VS JESUS CHRIST IN MINISTRY LEADERSHIP

Elite Eli’s Ministry  Double Standard ..and God’s People Realized…

 However,  Eli, the Top Dog, was LP and his beliefs were “MY BOYS CAN DO NO WRONG ” so he wouldn’t address them, much less set ’em down..but instead, allowed both of his “dear’ “gifted and special” boys  to continue doing as they pleased for he kept them, allowed them, enabled them… to remain on his staff!”

“Now Eli was very old, and heard all that his sons did unto all Israel;

and how they lay with the women that assembled at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

And he said unto them, Why do ye such things? for I hear of your evil dealings by all this people.

Nay, my sons; for it is no good report that I hear: ye make the Lord’s people to transgress.
If one man sin against another, the judge shall judge him: but if a man sin against the Lord, who shall intreat for him? Notwithstanding they hearkened not unto the voice of their father, because the Lord would slay them.”
Big Shot I Samuel 2:22-25

Taveau asks ChatGPT AI

Please View This as a Cautionary Tale

Eli and his sons represent a cautionary tale against false leadership and spiritual negligence. While Eli’s passive leadership enabled the corruption, his sons’ blatant sins invoked God’s judgment. In contrast, true spiritual authority reflects servant leadership, accountability, and reverence for God — characteristics exemplified by Jesus Christ.

This serves as a sobering reminder for modern Christian leaders to uphold God’s standards and shepherd with integrity, avoiding the pitfalls of self-serving, abusive leadership.

The Double Standard in Ministry Leadership: A Call for Integrity and Reverence

In today’s Christian ministry landscape, a troubling double standard often emerges in leadership — one where moral failings among male leaders are excused or minimized, while women in ministry or the congregation face harsh scrutiny. This dynamic is not new. From the story of Eli and his sons to modern-day scandals, the tendency to tolerate sin in leadership, particularly among men, has been a persistent issue.

Ultimately, this compromise of holiness comes with a spiritual consequence. Just as Hophni and Phinehas faced divine judgment, leaders today are accountable before God. The question remains — is the unrepentant leader’s name blotted out of the Book of Life?

Chief Points:

• Misuse of Power: Hophni and Phinehas used their authority for personal gain, stealing from the sacrifices and committing sexual sin with the women serving at the tabernacle.

• Lack of Accountability: Eli, although aware of their actions, failed to hold them accountable. His mild rebuke (1 Samuel 2:23-25) was insufficient to bring correction.

• God’s Judgment: God sent a prophetic word against Eli’s household, condemning his failure to restrain his sons. This is a biblical picture of false authority — those in leadership who exploit their roles rather than serve God and His people.

Point: They went too far, past the point of no return:

Based on their unrepentant sin and the severe judgment pronounced upon them, it is likely that they faced eternal separation from God.:

1. God’s Judgment Pronounced:

   • “Therefore I have sworn unto the house of Eli, that the iniquity of Eli’s house shall not be purged with sacrifice nor offering for ever.” (1 Samuel 3:14)
     This indicates that their sins had reached a point where no atonement was possible.

2. Death as Divine Judgment:

   • “And this shall be a sign unto thee, that shall come upon thy two sons, on Hophni and Phinehas; in one day they shall die both of them.” (1 Samuel 2:34)
     Their physical death represented God’s final judgment on their rebellion.

3. Loss of Priestly Lineage:

   • “And I will raise me up a faithful priest, that shall do according to that which is in mine heart and in my mind.” (1 Samuel 2:35)
     Their removal from priestly service suggests rejection from God’s covenant blessings.

   • 

“We Three Big Bosses” 

Eli’s Leadership and the Sons’ Corruption: A Biblical Warning

In 1 Samuel 2, we read how Hophni and Phinehas, the sons of Eli, served as priests in the tabernacle. Rather than upholding their sacred responsibilities, they exploited their positions.

• They stole from the offerings intended for God (1 Samuel 2:17).

• They engaged in sexual immorality with the women who served at the entrance of the tabernacle (1 Samuel 2:22).

• Despite knowing this, Eli failed to take decisive action, offering only a weak rebuke (1 Samuel 2:23-25).

This spiritual negligence was not simply a personal failure but a betrayal of sacred trust. Eli’s tolerance of sin among his sons demonstrated a false governing authority — one that compromised holiness for familial loyalty and institutional comfort. Ultimately, God’s judgment came upon Eli’s household (1 Samuel 3:13-14).

Hophni and Phinehas represent leaders who abuse their spiritual authority and defile God’s house. While they held high offices, their disregard for God’s holiness ensured their downfall. In contrast, leaders today who walk in reverence and repentance remain secure in Christ.

The Modern Parallel: “Boys Will Be Boys” in Ministry

Many ministries today display a similar pattern. Prominent pastors, bishops, and ministry leaders are often shielded from accountability despite evident moral failings — particularly in matters of sexual sin, greed, and spiritual abuse.

• Moral Compromise: Leaders may misuse their power, manipulating or exploiting women while using their charisma and influence to silence critics.

• Selective Judgment: Women are often labeled as “Jezebels” or accused of seduction, while the men involved are portrayed as “fallen” but “restored.”

• Lack of Accountability: Instead of biblical correction, ministries may justify or conceal misconduct to protect reputations, platforms, and financial interests.

This “boys will be boys” mentality not only corrupts the witness of the church but also further marginalizes women, reinforcing a Levitical Patriarchism (LP) model that undermines Christ-like servant leadership.

Plague of Ministry Levitical Patriarchism

Modern ministry is often plagued by the same “Boys Will Be Boys” mentality. When male leaders fall into sexual sin, it is frequently rationalized or downplayed. Meanwhile, women are often labeled as seductresses, “Jezebels,” or threats to the purity of the church. This double standard is evident when:

• Fallen male leaders are restored swiftly, sometimes without true repentance, while the women involved are ostracized.

• Ministry leaders justify immoral behavior by pointing to their anointing, popularity, or giftedness.

• Spiritual manipulation is used to silence those who speak out, branding them as divisive or rebellious.

This not only destroys the credibility of the church but mocks the holiness of God. Scripture warns that those who persist in sin without repentance face eternal consequences:

“The Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven.” — Deuteronomy 29:20
“He that overcometh… I will not blot out his name out of the book of life.” — Revelation 3:5

A National Call for God’s Standard

++ A Call to Holiness and Reverence

Scripture calls leaders to a standard of holiness and humility. Unlike the priesthood of Eli’s sons, those in spiritual leadership are called to serve with reverence and accountability:

• “Be ye holy; for I am holy.”(1 Peter 1:16)

• “Let the priests, the ministers of the Lord, weep between the porch and the altar.”(Joel 2:17)

• “For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God.”(1 Peter 4:17)

Leaders are not above correction. Just as God intervened in the case of Eli, He will hold modern leaders accountable for their conduct, especially when they misuse their authority.

++ The Double Standard: A Reflection of Heart Condition

While ministries often publicly denounce sin, many remain silent when it comes to their own. A pastor may condemn sexual immorality from the pulpit while engaging in the same sin privately. Women who come forward with truth may face character assassination while the male leader is shielded by institutional power.

The hypocrisy seen in such cases echoes the Pharisees of Jesus’ time:

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones.” — Matthew 23:27

True spiritual authority is marked by humility, accountability, and holiness. Leaders must examine whether they mirror Christ or perpetuate a false governing authority like Eli.

++ The Impact on Women and God’s Holiness

The abuse of authority perpetuates misogyny and a devaluation of women. Women who are used, discarded, and shamed experience deep spiritual and emotional harm. They are seen not as co-heirs in Christ but as disposable objects.

The Levitical Patriarchism (LP) mindset further reinforces this. By promoting a male-dominated hierarchy that diminishes the voice of women, ministries create environments where abuse thrives. Leaders excuse their own sin under the guise of male superiority while holding women to impossible standards of purity and submission.

Yet, God values women. The Bible is full of examples where women played vital roles in God’s redemptive plan — from Deborah the judge to Mary Magdalene who was entrusted with the news of Christ’s resurrection. In Christ’s ministry, women were not objects of exploitation but valued disciples.

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” — Galatians 3:28

Eli’s Coming..Hide Your Hearts Now!

Taveau asks ChatGPT

Please continue to expound upon Eli and his sons “authority abuse”  “double standard”

Chat GPT replies

Eli’s Sons and the Abuse of Authority: Confronting the Double Standard in Ministry

The Sin of Hophni and Phinehas: Beyond Sexual Sin

In 1 Samuel 2:12-17, 22-25, we see the egregious behavior of Eli’s sons:

• They stole from God — Taking the best portions of the offerings by force, despising the worship of the people.

• They defiled women — Using their authority to seduce and sleep with the women who served at the tabernacle entrance.

• They rejected correction — Despite warnings, their hearts remained hardened, further dishonoring God.

This abuse was not limited to personal moral failure. It was a systematic perversion of spiritual authority. They viewed their leadership position as a means of self-gratification rather than serving God’s people.

They objectified and dehumanized the women they pursued. Instead of seeing them as beloved creations of God, these leaders treated them as disposable objects of pleasure. Through manipulation and seduction, they used their positions to exploit those entrusted to their pastoral care. This blatant disregard for God’s holiness corrupted not only the women but the entire spiritual community.

“Wherefore the sin of the young men was very great before the Lord: for men abhorred the offering of the Lord.” — 1 Samuel 2:17

** WELP Boys Will Be Boys:

False Authority and the Spirit of Domination

The unchecked behavior of Hophni and Phinehas reflects the spirit of false authority — leadership that operates from ego, manipulation, and self-interest rather than the fear of the Lord. False authority is marked by:

• Charisma over Character: Using charm and influence to control others instead of leading with humility.

• Greedy Conquest: Pursuing power, possessions, and people for self-advancement.

• Selective Accountability: Enforcing strict standards on others while excusing personal sin.

• Defiling Holy Things: Treating the sacred — including relationships, ministry roles, and people — as tools for pleasure and gain.

Eli’s passivity further empowered this spirit. His unwillingness to discipline his sons allowed the culture of sin to flourish. God’s judgment ultimately fell upon his house because of this negligence (1 Samuel 3:13-14).

The Adam Syndrome in “Boys Will Be Boys” Poor Me LP  Ministry

Resembles Adam in Genesis 3 Garden”

“It’s that Little Christian Woman, YOU gave us Lord”

(as it’s always the woman’s fault”)

because, just like EVE…she’s a vixen, a witch, a wanton Jezebel”

Modern ministry is often plagued by the same “Boys Will Be Boys” mentality. When male leaders fall into sexual sin, it is frequently rationalized or downplayed. Meanwhile, women are often labeled as seductresses, “Jezebels,” or threats to the purity of the church. This double standard is evident when:

• Fallen male leaders are restored swiftly, sometimes without true repentance, while the women involved are ostracized.

• Ministry leaders justify immoral behavior by pointing to their anointing, popularity, or giftedness.

• Spiritual manipulation is used to silence those who speak out, branding them as divisive or rebellious.

This not only destroys the credibility of the church but mocks the holiness of God. Scripture warns that those who persist in sin without repentance face eternal consequences:

“The Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven.” — Deuteronomy 29:20
“He that overcometh… I will not blot out his name out of the book of life.” — Revelation 3:5

** Send in the Top Down WELP Patriarchy… Objectification of Females

At its core, the abuse of women by leaders like Hophni and Phinehas stems from a mindset of objectification and domination.

• Women are viewed as commodities for pleasure, rather than as image-bearers of God.

• Their experiences are invalidated, while male perpetrators are shielded from accountability.

• Dehumanization occurs when women are reduced to mere objects of desire, stripped of their dignity and worth.

** St Paul’s 2 Timothy 3:6-8 Unpleasant Last Days Huge Warning Involves This

This pattern is especially evident in ministries where charismatic authority and unchecked power create opportunities for manipulation. Leaders may use their influence to seduce, coerce, or silence those they exploit, further perpetuating a culture of spiritual abuse.

“For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts.” — 2 Timothy 3:6

++ THE  RADICAL CHRIST

God’s Call to True Leadership: His Son Jesus

In contrast to false authority, Jesus exemplified servant leadership. He rejected the world’s view of power and instead demonstrated humility, purity, and reverence for all people. Christ’s leadership was characterized by:

• Accountability and Integrity: Confronting sin with truth and grace.

• Reverence for God’s Image: Honoring and protecting the dignity of all people, including women.

• Humility in Service: Washing the feet of His disciples and bearing the cross for all.

“The Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.” — Matthew 20:28

In contrast to Eli, Jesus never tolerated the misuse of authority. He confronted religious leaders who twisted their positions for personal gain, condemning their hypocrisy. Modern ministry leaders are likewise called to uphold God’s standard — refusing to tolerate exploitation and holding their peers accountable.

A Higher Call to Modern Ministries

Break free from the Eli syndrome and the “Boys Will Be Boys” culture, the church must return to God’s holy standard.

1. Confront Sin with Courage: Spiritual leaders must hold one another accountable, without partiality.

2. Honor Women as Co-Heirs: Recognize and elevate the value of women in ministry and leadership.

3. Restore Reverence: Teach and model a genuine fear of the Lord, knowing that God sees all.

4. Reject False Authority: Leaders must forsake manipulation and domination, embracing servant leadership.

The story of Hophni and Phinehas serves as a warning. Ministry is not a playground for personal pleasure or conquest. It is a sacred responsibility that demands humility, purity, and a reverential fear of God.

“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body.” — 2 Corinthians 5:10

Restore the higher of frank (private, personal, genuine relationship) authority and personal, private governing  deep  integrity, knowing that the God who sees in secret will one day bring all things to light.

++ Restoring Integrity in Ministry

Addressing the double standard requires a return to Christ-centered servant leadership:

1. Repentance and Accountability: Leaders must acknowledge their failings, step down when necessary, and seek genuine restoration.

2. Respect and Value for Women: Ministries must reject harmful biases and ensure women are treated with dignity.

3. Transparent Governance: Establish systems of accountability that prevent cover-ups and favoritism.

4. Holy Fear of God: Encourage leaders to cultivate personal reverence for God’s holiness, recognizing the weight of their calling.

++ Final Call: A Sobering Reminder for Leaders

The story of Eli and his sons stands as a stark warning. The failure to uphold God’s standards in leadership results in the departure of God’s presence — just as Ichabod was declared when the Ark of the Covenant was taken (1 Samuel 4:21).

Today, the church has the opportunity to reject double standards and model the character of Christ. Through repentance, accountability, and a renewed commitment to holiness, Christian leaders can restore integrity to the ministry and offer a faithful witness to a watching world.

Let us remember the sobering words of Malachi 2:7-8:

“For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts. But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law.”

May today’s leaders choose the narrow path of integrity, reflecting the servant leadership of Jesus Christ.

ChatGPT said:

This is a powerful and deeply relevant topic, addressing double standards in Christian ministry, particularly concerning the treatment of women and the holy reverence required for God’s office of leadership.

Let’s break this down and examine it through the lens of Eli, his sons, and modern ministry culture.

 1. Modern Parallels: The Ministry “Boys Club”

(1 Samuel 2:12-17, 22-25; 1 Samuel 3:11-14)

Eli’s failure reflects a modern issue in Christian ministry—how some powerful male leaders are protected, excused, or even admired, despite moral failings and abuse. It’s the “boys will be boys” mentality, where:

• Gifted, charismatic men are excused because of their influence and talent.

• Women who speak up are dismissed, blamed, or labeled as troublemakers (e.g., Jezebel accusations).

• Pastoral accountability is weak, because loyalty to “the brotherhood” often outweighs doing what’s right.

This creates a double standard:

• Women in ministry are often expected to be above reproach, modest, and submissive.

• Men in ministry (especially those in power) can engage in questionable, sinful behaviors and still be revered.

This isn’t just hypocrisy—it’s spiritual recklessness. It defiles the church, dishonors God, and hurts people.

2. The Call to Holy Office: God’s Standard vs. Man’s Excuses

God does not excuse ungodly behavior in leadership simply because someone is talented, persuasive, or successful. Throughout Scripture, God’s true leaders were:

1. Servant-hearted, not self-serving (Matthew 20:25-28).

2. Holy and set apart, not compromised (1 Peter 1:15-16).

3. Fearful of God, not casual about sin (Proverbs 9:10).

4. Accountable, not untouchable (1 Timothy 5:19-20).

The modern church needs to return to God’s standard for leadership. Eli’s tolerance of his sons led to disaster—likewise, if churches today excuse sin in leadership, God will intervene in His own time and way

3. The Impact on Women: From Eli’s Time to Today

The women defiled by Eli’s sons were not nameless to God. They were His daughters, mistreated by the very men who should have protected them. This pattern continues today:

• Clergy sexual abuse remains a widespread scandal.

• Women in ministry are often pushed aside or vilified.

• Survivors of abuse in the church are frequently shamed instead of supported.

This isn’t just about personal morality; it’s about how God’s people are treated. Leaders who dishonor women dishonor God Himself (Malachi 2:13-16).

ELI AND SONS but also End of OT “Pitiful Malachi” Before God Regarding His Abused, Forced to Divorce Ex Wife

 Malachi 2:13-16: A Direct Rebuke of Ministerial Hypocrisy

++ God rebukes the priests of Israel for treacherously dealing with the wives of their youth, treating them with contempt and then expecting God to bless them:

“You cover the altar of the Lord with tears, with weeping and crying, so He does not regard the offering anymore… Yet you say, ‘For what reason?’ Because the Lord has been witness between you and the wife of your youth, whom you have dealt treacherously; yet she is your companion and your wife by covenant.” (Malachi 2:13-14)

Many modern ministers are guilty of this very thing:

1. Mistreating their wives, women in their ministries, and church members.

2. Using and discarding women, then going before God expecting His favor.

3. Covering their unholiness with eloquence and spiritual excuses.

God rejects such offerings and prayers. He is not fooled by a leader’s charisma when their character is corrupt.

A Higher  Call for Today’s Christian Leaders:

“Holy, Holy, Holy!”

Ministry is not a boys’ club—it is a sacred calling. Those who lead must:

1. Respect women as co-heirs in Christ (Galatians 3:28).

2. Uphold moral integrity in relationships (1 Timothy 3:2-5).

3. Reject the culture of cover-ups and double standards (Ephesians 5:11).

4. Fear God, not protect the “ministry brand” (Proverbs 29:25).

Final Thought: Where Are the Eli’s Today?

Eli was not the villain, but his silence and inaction made him complicit. The same happens today. Many church leaders see sin and injustice but stay silent, afraid to confront powerful men in the “boys club.”

But God sees it all.

The fear of the Lord should lead true ministers to uphold holiness, not tolerate abuse.

The real question is: Will today’s Elis repent before it’s too late?

Sister Taveau:

Please review about the Christian ministry ‘double standard”

Chat says
There appears to be a double standard in many of these Bible believing churches, particularly when comparing the expectations for male leaders in ministry versus the treatment and roles of women. The Bible does set high moral standards for leaders, as seen in the verses we’ve discussed. However, a double standard arises in how these expectations are often applied when it comes to gender roles, treatment of women, and sexual morality in church settings.

The Church treatment of women, and sexual morality in church settings.

Key Points of Double Standard in Ministry:

1. High Expectations for Male Leaders’ Conduct:

   • As we’ve seen, the Bible establishes a clear moral and ethical framework for male leaders (bishops, elders, priests) in 1 Timothy 3:2-5, Titus 1:6-7, and other passages. These expectations include being faithful to one wife, leading their homes well, being sober and blameless, and not given to selfish desires or greed.

   • These rules emphasize personal holiness, and ministry leaders must maintain these high standards in private and public life. However, when these standards are applied, the treatment of women—especially in marriage or leadership contexts—often falls short.

2. Disrespect Toward Women in Leadership and Ministry:

   • Historically, women have been treated as inferior or secondary in many Christian traditions, even though Scripture speaks to the dignity and respect of women (such as in Proverbs 31, where the virtuous woman is celebrated, or Ephesians 5:28-29, where husbands are called to love their wives as their own bodies). But, unfortunately, in some patriarchal church structures (including in certain Levitical Patriarchism systems), women are still seen as subservient or less capable of leadership, especially when compared to male leaders.

3. The Hypocrisy of Male Leaders’ Behavior:

   • Malachi 2:13-16 speaks directly to the unfaithfulness of priests who defile their marriages but still go before God seeking His blessing. In modern times, this hypocrisy can manifest as sexual misconduct, mistreatment of women, and a lack of accountability for male ministers who often hold the power.

   • The double standard arises when these same male leaders are allowed to continue in leadership roles while they mistreat women, sexually abuse congregants, or treat their wives poorly (even divorcing them to marry someone else) without being held accountable, while women in similar situations are often shamed, silenced, or dismissed.

4. The Disproportionate Blame on Women:

   • In many church environments, women are expected to maintain purity, modesty, and a submissive role, but these standards are not always equally applied to male leaders. The common phrase “Be holy as I am holy” (1 Peter 1:16) is often weaponized in a way that places undue pressure on women to conform to strict standards of behavior, while male leaders may be given a pass for inappropriate actions, whether sexually or morally.

   • This is further seen in the tendency for women to be labeled with derogatory terms such as Jezebel, witch, or seductress based on their appearance or behavior, while male leaders who engage in similar misconduct are not equally labeled. This applies not only in charismatic ministries but also in historical contexts like the Salem witch trials or the Scarlet Letter era, where women’s sexuality and moral behavior were strictly policed, but men often escaped scrutiny.

5. Male Leaders and the Use of Power:

   • In ministry, male leaders sometimes exploit their position of power over women in ways that are both spiritually and morally damaging. This is especially problematic in contexts where male leaders use their spiritual authority to manipulate, control, or exploit women under the guise of “spiritual authority” or even “God’s will”.

   • Malachi 2:14-16 and Matthew 23:27-28 emphasize that God hates unfaithfulness and hypocrisy, and that leaders are accountable for their actions, yet in many church settings, men in power often get away with actions that are deemed inappropriate for women.

6. Jesus’ Treatment of Women vs. Cultural Norms:

   • Jesus treated women with dignity and respect, even when the culture of His day did not. Luke 7:36-50 (the story of the sinful woman anointing Jesus’ feet), Luke 10:38-42 (Mary and Martha), and John 8:1-11 (the woman caught in adultery) demonstrate how Jesus broke cultural barriers by affirming women and their value. Yet, many ministries today, particularly those that embrace Levitical Patriarchism, have not followed this model and instead treat women as inferior to men in both spiritual and leadership roles.

7. Ministers and Sexual Misconduct:

   • A recurring issue in the modern church is sexual misconduct by male leaders. Whether through abuse of power, exploitation, or even adultery, many male leaders are allowed to continue in their roles despite their actions. Matthew 23:27-28 speaks to the hypocrisy of outwardly appearing righteous but being full of corruption inside. This double standard creates an environment where the unfaithfulness of male leaders is often overlooked, while women are expected to maintain the highest standards of morality, even in situations where male leaders set a poor example.

Conclusion: A Call to Correct the Double Standard

The double standard that allows male leaders to be treated with leniency, while women are held to disproportionately high standards, needs to be addressed within the church today. The Bible provides a clear moral code for all believers, both men and women, and leaders are called to reflect Christ’s character in their personal lives as much as their public ministry. It is crucial for ministries to reject hypocrisy and abuse and apply the same standards of holiness, respect, and accountability to both male leaders and female congregants. The church must embrace a holistic approach to leadership that includes mutual respect for men and women and emphasizes the need for holiness, integrity, and accountability in all relationships.

Taveau says
Please review the Old Testament Roots for “holy fear of the Lord’ (respect for His Eternal Majesty) service before the Lord, in office senior authority, use Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic where it applies, And how does this effect a Christian ministry weak double standard

ChatGPT said:

The double standard in ministry, particularly in leadership roles like Eli and others, is a significant issue in biblical narratives, especially when contrasted with the calling and standards required of the high priesthood in both the Old and New Testaments. Let’s dive deeper into this, comparing specific verses and their meanings in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic, and how these principles apply to ministry today.

POINT: The High Priesthood: A Sacred Call

In the Old Testament, the role of the high priest was incredibly sacred, involving the mediation of the people’s sins before God. The high priest was to be a spiritual leader, responsible for maintaining holiness in the community, offering sacrifices, and making atonement for the people.

1. “Be ye holy as I am holy” (Leviticus 11:44 KJV)

   • Hebrew: “קדשׁ” (qadesh) – this means “to consecrate,” “to sanctify,” or “to make holy.” It implies a separation from common things to God’s purpose.

   • Application: God calls His people and leaders to be separate, not just outwardly but inwardly. The high priest and leaders must live a life set apart to fulfill their sacred duties. This command was given not just to the high priest but to the whole nation of Israel, and in the New Testament, this applies to every believer, especially those in leadership positions.

2. “Let the priest weep between the porch and the altar” (Joel 2:17 KJV)

   • Hebrew: “מִזְבֵּ֥חַ” (mizbeach) – “altar,” and “הֵיכַל” (heykal) – “porch,” referring to the area of the temple between the altar and the inner sanctum.

   • Application: The priest was called to weep before God on behalf of the people, showing humility and repentance. This act reflected the deep personal commitment of the priest to the spiritual welfare of the community. In modern ministry, this could be seen as the humility and intercession of leaders, recognizing their role as servants of God and mediators for others, crying out for purity and grace before the Lord. It’s about weeping over sin, both personal and corporate, not just a ritualistic act but one that expresses deep remorse and longing for reconciliation with God.

MAIN POINT: Eli and the Double Standard

Eli, the high priest in the Old Testament, offers a striking example of a leader who failed to meet the high standard required by God.

• Eli’s Failure (1 Samuel 2:12-17, 1 Samuel 3:13): Eli’s sons, Hophni and Phinehas, were corrupt priests, engaging in immoral activities, including taking the sacrifices meant for God for themselves. Eli failed to correct them, and though he rebuked them, he did not take the necessary steps to remove them from their roles or discipline them properly.

  • Hebrew (1 Samuel 2:13-15): “חטּא” (chata) – “to sin.” The word conveys a willful disobedience against God’s established order. Eli failed to enforce the righteousness that was required of the high priesthood.

  • Application: In modern ministry, this can be seen as a failure of leadership to maintain integrity and discipline. A double standard occurs when leaders overlook their own or others’ moral failings while still expecting a standard of holiness from those they lead. Leadership is called to model holiness, not just preach it.

In contrast, God had a higher standard for His ministers. The high priesthood was meant to be a reflection of God’s holiness, requiring holiness in their conduct, speech, and actions.

POINT: The High Calling in the New Testament

In the New Testament, the call to holiness is extended to all believers, and leadership is not exempt from this.

• 1 Peter 1:16 (KJV): “Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.”

  • Greek: “ἅγιος” (hagios) – “holy, sacred, set apart.” The imperative form here implies a continuous, ongoing act of separation from sin and consecration to God’s service.

  • Application: This is not just a command but a reflection of the believer’s identity in Christ. Leaders, in particular, must model this holiness for the congregation. The New Testament understanding expands this holiness beyond the high priesthood to every believer, but the expectations for leaders remain high. Leaders are meant to be an example, with personal holiness that matches their public ministry.

BIG POINT
The Bottom Line: God’s Call in Service

The foundational principle in serving God is a deep, personal calling that originates from God Himself. This is where Eli and other leaders like him fall short. They did not heed the calling fully, allowing the double standard to creep in and affect their leadership.

In both the Old and New Testament, the call to holiness and righteousness is not just a set of rules but a reflection of God’s nature. Those called into leadership are not to treat the sacredness of their calling lightly.

1. Exodus 28:36-38: The high priest’s garments were to have a plate of gold inscribed with “HOLINESS TO THE LORD” (Hebrew: “קֹדֶשׁ לַיהוָה” – “qodesh l’YHWH”). This inscription reminds the high priest that his ministry is dedicated to God alone, and this principle extends to all leadership in the church today.

2. Romans 12:1-2: “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind…” This is the essence of a leader’s call—to offer their life as a living sacrifice in the service of God, adhering to the high calling of personal and public holiness.

Summary:A Review

The double standard in ministry—seen in the case of Eli—is a failure of leadership to uphold the holiness and moral integrity required by God. The call to holiness, which was central to the priesthood in the Old Testament, is just as relevant for leaders today. Both personal and public holiness are demanded, with leaders holding a higher standard due to their position of authority. Whether in the Old or New Testament, the calling to serve God is not about outward rituals but about a deep, personal commitment to live in accordance with God’s will, with humility and repentance.

The bottom line is that God calls His people to holiness, and this is especially true for leaders. They are to model holiness, reflecting God’s character in their private and public lives. The message remains: God called me, and I am to live and serve according to His holiness.

* Eli as a Symbol of Tolerant, Permissive Ministry and Misogyny

Eli, as the high priest of Israel, was indeed old and accustomed to a certain way of ministry. Yet, despite his position, he failed to uphold God’s holiness when it came to his sons, Hophni and Phinehas, who were abusing their positions and engaging in sinful behavior. Eli’s tolerance, or permissiveness, in dealing with their sin stands as a stark warning to leaders today. His inability or unwillingness to address their actions led to a tragic downfall, showing how leadership without a fear of God ultimately leads to failure and judgment.

++ LP Patriarch Eli’s office values reflected the carnal values of his culture

In Eli’s case, there is also a reflection of the societal norms of his time, where women were seen as of lesser value, and their voices were often ignored or minimized. This kind of cultural backdrop has had lingering effects, even into modern times, particularly in what you described as Levitical Patriarchal (LP) structures in many churches. These patriarchal systems can often involve abuses of power, where the worth of women is disregarded, and leadership falls into the hands of men who may see their authority as unchecked, often leading to manipulation, sexual abuse, and exploitation.

Knowing the Life of Christ

Sister Taveau says
Please defining Jesus Christ as a Servant Leader and Biblical Leadership Model in Relation to Women

In the biblical context, Jesus Christ is portrayed as the ultimate servant leader, whose life, ministry, and teachings define how Christian leadership should be exercised. This leadership model contrasts sharply with the power-based, authoritarian, and controlling styles often seen in the world, and even in some parts of the church.

Chat GPT replies:

1. Servant Leadership Model:

Jesus’ leadership is fundamentally servant-oriented. This is exemplified in passages like Matthew 20:26-28, where Jesus tells his disciples:

“But it shall not be so among you; but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.” (KJV)

• Servant leadership focuses on serving others, not dominating them. Jesus lived this out not only in his interactions with his disciples and the crowds but also in his sacrificial death on the cross. For him, leadership was about selflessness, humility, and putting others first—principles that are central to any biblical leadership model.

• A servant leader leads by example, putting the needs of others above their own and encouraging others to follow in that pattern. For Jesus, servant leadership was not about lording over others but about empowering them to become all that God created them to be.

2. Christ’s View of Women:

Jesus was radical for his time in his respectful and equal treatment of women, especially in a patriarchal society that often marginalized women. He treated women with dignity, honor, and love, and included them in his ministry in ways that were revolutionary for his time.

• Jesus’ conversations with women: Jesus spoke openly with women, which was highly unusual for Jewish men of that era. In John 4, he converses with the Samaritan woman at the well, revealing his Messianic identity to her. This not only broke cultural taboos but also empowered her to become an evangelist to her town.

• Women in Jesus’ ministry: Women such as Mary Magdalene, Mary of Bethany, Martha, and others were central figures in Jesus’ ministry. They were not simply passive supporters; they were active participants, receiving his teachings, making sacrifices, and supporting his work (Luke 8:1-3). Jesus broke cultural norms by allowing women to sit at his feet and learn from him (Luke 10:38-42), an act that was considered inappropriate for women at the time.

• The Resurrection: Jesus entrusted women to be the first witnesses of the resurrection (Matthew 28:1-10), signifying their vital role in spreading the gospel. He could have chosen male disciples for this task, but he specifically chose women, thus acknowledging their equal worth and importance in the Kingdom of God.

3. Non-Controlling, Non-Biased, Non-Misogynist Leadership:

Jesus’ leadership model is one of non-controlling authority. He never forced anyone into submission, and never manipulated people for personal gain. Instead, he invited others into the Kingdom through love, grace, and truth.

• Non-controlling: Jesus did not impose his will on people but instead offered them the freedom to choose whether or not to follow him. This is evident in his encounters with individuals like the rich young ruler (Mark 10:17-22), where he did not demand obedience but allowed the man to make his own decision. This was true even for his disciples—he led by inviting them into a relationship rather than controlling them.

• Non-biased and non-misogynistic: Jesus’ interactions with women show a respectful, equal approach. While the cultural norms of the time would have marginalized women, Jesus elevated them. He treated women with dignity, never belittling, objectifying, or dismissing them. He modeled an approach that respects every person, regardless of gender, race, or social status. His ministry was not restricted by gender boundaries; rather, it included everyone, offering a place of belonging for both men and women.

4. Fellowship Ministry Model:

A fellowship ministry modeled after Jesus is one where relationships are built on mutual respect, honor, and love. It is a place where leaders and followers are united by their shared commitment to Christ, and where leadership is defined by service rather than dominance.

• Empowerment, not control: The primary aim of a fellowship ministry should be to empower others in their calling, helping them to grow in their relationship with God and each other. Leadership should be focused on nurturing and guiding others, not manipulating or controlling them.

• Inclusivity and equality: A true fellowship ministry will be one where both men and women have equal opportunities to lead, share their gifts, and participate in the life of the church. There will be no gendered restrictions on who can serve in different ministry roles, and leadership will focus on character and spiritual maturity, rather than gender.

Taveau says
Please Define the Traits of Christ as a Leader:

Chat GPT says:

When evaluating the leadership of Christ, particularly in relation to authority and women, several key traits stand out:

1. Humility: Jesus demonstrated the deepest humility in his leadership. He washed his disciples’ feet (John 13:1-17), showing that true leadership is about serving, not being served.

2. Compassion and Grace: Christ’s leadership was marked by compassion, not harshness. He was gracious toward the marginalized, broken, and sinners (Luke 7:36-50), treating them with dignity and offering them a chance for transformation.

3. Empowering Others: Jesus empowered those around him to continue his work. He sent out his disciples (Matthew 28:19) and trusted them to carry out the mission of the church. He empowered women, as seen in his relationship with Mary Magdalene and others.

4. Equality and Inclusion: Jesus showed a remarkable ability to look beyond societal norms and create space for those who were often excluded—including women. His life and ministry offer a profound model for equality in the church.

++ The Call to Model Today’s Ministry:

1. Christ’s Leadership Today: Modern Christian leadership should aim to model Christ in humility, servant-heartedness, and empowerment. Leaders should focus on serving their congregations and helping others grow in their faith—not using their positions for personal gain or control.

2. Gender Equality: The church must model gender equality in ministry. Women should be given the same opportunities for leadership and spiritual influence as men, based on their gifts and calling rather than societal norms or biases.

3. Holistic Ministry: Jesus’ ministry was holistic—it addressed the spiritual, emotional, and physical needs of individuals. Today’s ministry should reflect this same balance by offering support and nurturing that promotes the whole person in relationship with God.

4. Empowerment, not Control: Today’s church must reject any form of controlling leadership. Pastors and leaders should focus on empowering others and creating a space where people are free to serve God and others according to their calling, without fear of manipulation or abuse.

Conclusion for This Part : Jesus Christ

Jesus Christ’s leadership model offers a transformative vision for modern church leadership—one that is based on service, humility, empowerment, and respect for all people, regardless of gender. The call to model Christ’s leadership today is urgent in the face of rising gender biases, abuse of power, and controlling behaviors in many modern ministries. If the church is to live out the gospel, it must embrace a biblical model of leadership that reflects Christ’s treatment of women, servant-heartedness, and a commitment to equality and respect for all believers.

Feigned Lip Service: Pastoral, Prophet,Elder Leader,Lay Saint Private Integrity
“Let your yes be “yes” your no “no”

Apostolic Dr Taveau says
Please address: The Double Standard False Witness, Witchcraft, Two Faced, Playing Reputational  Evil Eye Mind Games

1 Peter 1:15-16 – The call to be holy:

• 1 Peter 1:15-16 – “But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.”

Training Modern Christian Ministries on the Value, Respect, and Holiness in Leadership:

My TCL Leadership  Call to Reject the Eli Syndrome and the Abuse of Power

In today’s church landscape, there is a critical need for a return to biblical principles that uphold the dignity and value of women, respect for holiness, and the rejection of controlling, abusive leadership practices. We see a troubling trend of Eli-like leadership in modern Christian ministries—where leaders either tolerate sin, misuse their authority, or fail to hold themselves and their followers accountable. This behavior is often exacerbated by a systemic bias against women, where they are subjected to mistreatment, word curses, and manipulation in the name of leadership or authority. In this article, we will explore biblical teachings on the value of women, the call to holy living, and the need for Christian leaders to protect, rather than control, those under their care.

The Eli Syndrome: A Case of Tolerant, Permissive Ministry

Eli, the high priest in the Old Testament, serves as an example of tolerant and permissive ministry that overlooked the sinful actions of his sons, Hophni and Phinehas. Despite being in a position of spiritual authority, Eli failed to address their abuses and sinful behaviors, allowing them to continue their wickedness without correction. This permissive attitude—often seen in modern leadership—can lead to the abuse of power and the marginalization of those most vulnerable. In particular, women in some churches experience this firsthand, where leadership may use or abuse their position to manipulate and exploit female congregants.

1 Samuel 2:12-17 (KJV)

“Now the sons of Eli were sons of Belial; (means the mean devil)they knew not the Lord. And the priests’ custom with the people was, that, when any man offered sacrifice, the priest’s servant came, while the flesh was in seething, with a flesh-hook of three teeth in his hand; and he struck it into the pan, or kettle, or caldron, or pot; all that the flesh-hook brought up the priest took for himself. So they did in Shiloh unto all the Israelites that came thither.”

• Eli’s sons were abusing their power by taking what was not theirs, even defiling the offerings meant for God. But Eli’s failure to address this sin and stop them ultimately led to God’s judgment.
• This permissive behavior in leadership reflects the modern church’s double standard: there are those who believe that boys will be boys or that some leaders can do no wrong, often disregarding the sanctity of women’s dignity in the process.

Devalue the Many Christian Women

Modern Parallels: Abuse, Word Curses, and the Double Standard (continued)

The Bible teaches us that God does not show favoritism (Romans 2:11). However, many modern ministries have adopted Levitical Patriarchy (LP), where women are often treated as lesser than their male counterparts, and abuses of power go unchecked. In some churches, leaders engage in toxic behaviors—sleeping with women in the congregation, word-cursing them, defiling them through manipulative tactics, and sometimes even branding them as “Jezebels” or “witches” for standing up or expressing their concerns. This double standard—where male leaders are given a pass for their misconduct, while women are blamed and cast aside—perpetuates cycles of abuse, disillusionment, and shame.

Such behavior is not just a failure of leadership; it’s a deep distortion of the principles of “human values” of authentic “other centered” real respect, value, and holiness that should define the church. Many women, under the guise of ministry, have been subjected to mistreatment or manipulation by leaders who wield their authority as a tool for personal gain or sexual exploitation. This is an abuse of power that echoes the permissive attitude of Eli and his sons. These leaders fail to recognize their role as stewards of God’s people, and instead, they use and abuse the trust placed in them.

Jesus Open Rebuke Matthew 23:23-24 (KJV)

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.”

In this rebuke, Jesus condemns the Pharisees for their hypocrisy in focusing on minor rituals while neglecting the more important aspects of justice, mercy, and faith. This mirrors the way some churches today focus on outward appearances and legalistic rules, while failing to address the much deeper issues of moral failure, sexual abuse, and the devaluation of women. In many of these cases, the leaders might publicly preach about holiness and moral living, but behind the scenes, they tolerate or even engage in sinful actions that contradict those very teachings

The Devaluation of Women: A Biblical Context

The Bible consistently affirms the value and dignity of women, (also all types, styles of persons) as throughout history, women have often been subject to mistreatment and degradation within society and even within the church. This misogyny isn’t just a modern issue—it was present in the days of Jesus, who consistently elevated the status of women in a society that largely marginalized them.

In Luke 10:38-42, we find the story of Mary and Martha. While Martha was busy preparing, Mary sat at Jesus’ feet, learning from Him. Martha, frustrated with her sister, asked Jesus to tell Mary to help her. But Jesus responded, saying, “Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things: but one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.”

Jesus, in this moment, affirmed the value of a woman learning, listening, and being engaged in His teachings, in contrast to the patriarchal norms of the time. He rejected the idea that a woman’s place should be restricted to the home, offering a radical affirmation of a woman’s intellectual and spiritual value.

BIG VERSE: 1 Corinthians 11:11-12 (KJV)

“Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord. For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God.”

This passage reaffirms that both men and women are co-laborers in the Lord. There is no hierarchy in Christ that diminishes the value of one over the other. Women are equally important to God’s mission and are called to be active participants in ministry, without being silenced or degraded.

The Salem Witch Trials, The Scarlet Letter, and the “Evil Eye”

Part 3 goes into this Patriarchal First colonial, USA History more about the effect on the Christian Ministries

If we look back at historical examples like the Salem Witch Trials or the Scarlet Letter, we can see a pattern of judgment and shaming that was often disproportionately targeted toward women. During the Salem Witch Trials, many women were accused of being witches based on baseless accusations, superstitions, and the personal agendas of others. This type of behavior has tragically crept into the church, where women are often labeled as Jezebels, witches, or troublemakers for challenging abusive leadership or speaking out against injustice. In some cases, they are labeled this way based on their courage, prophetic voices, or desire to lead.

Similarly, the “evil eye”—an ancient superstition—was used to stigmatize or curse women who were seen as too powerful or too outspoken. In Christian circles, word curses are sometimes cast upon women who do not conform to male-dominated leadership structures, with labels like “witch” or “Jezebel” being used to silence them. This form of spiritual abuse often masquerades as spiritual authority, when in fact, it is manipulation and control.

Guarding, Not Controlling: The Call for Holy Leadership

The message is clear: we are called to guard and protect, not control or abuse. As Christian leaders, it is our responsibility to respect, value, and uplift women in ministry. This involves not only empowering women to use their God-given gifts but also ensuring that they are treated with honor, dignity, and respect.

The Eli Syndrome—where leaders tolerate sin, manipulate their positions, and refuse to confront wrongdoing—must be rejected. Instead, we are called to holy living, where we hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, accountability, and purity. We must remember that holiness is not a selective requirement for women or men but is a universal standard for all believers in leadership.

2 Timothy 3:6-8 (KJV)

“For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.”

In this passage, Paul warns against those who manipulate, deceive, and control others, especially women, by leading them into sin and false teachings. These leaders are spiritually corrupt, much like the Egyptian magicians who resisted the truth during Moses’ time. Today, we must guard against this manipulation in ministry, where women are led into sinful relationships, exploited for power, or subjected to word curses that only serve to control and degrade.

Conclusion: The Call to Guard, Not Control

The church must reject any form of manipulation, abuse, or mistreatment of women. The Eli Syndrome, where leaders permit sin to flourish and manipulate their authority, must be confronted. We must train leaders who respect the value of women in the body of Christ, guard their integrity, and model holy living for all to follow.

We must move away from patriarchal traditions that devalue women and return to a biblical understanding of holiness, where both men and women are called to serve God with purity, integrity, and respect. This means rejecting the patterns of behavior that lead to abuse, including sexual misconduct, word cursing, manipulation, and silencing women. By doing so, we honor God’s design, uphold the dignity of women, and live in a way that reflects the holiness He desires in His people.

The church must once again be a place where holiness and reverence for God are paramount, where all members—especially women—are respected, valued, and protected, and where true leaders guard their hearts and the hearts of their flock from the corruption of sin. Let us be faithful in modeling a ministry that not only stands for holiness but also honors the fear of the Lord, empowering both men and women to serve and grow in God’s truth.