PART 5 SUBMISSION: FIRST CHURCH LEADERSHIP VS MODERN AUTHORITARIAN LEADERSHIP

MINISTRY AI AND I

PART 5 MEANING OF SUBMISSION

FIRST CHURCH LEADERSHIP VS MODERN AUTHORITARIAN LEADERSHIP
Who is over Whom?

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI

This series definition of

  • Organic” Bible First Church in servant leader, mutual submission, Ephesians 5:21 (Chat GPT AI defined (wanted to be  fully objective) that in another section.
  • Top Down Church (is mostly now) One main top leader, prone to be authoritarian, but not all

Taveau asks Chat GPT

Please define briefly the organic First Church model of Servant Leader Matthew… I mean, Ephesians 5.21, Everybody, which was Jesus, the First Church. Compare it with the top-down church, which is authoritarian, prone to control. Do that, and then answer. Do you think that the comment by Paul, 1 Corinthians 3, Don’t say, I am for Apollos, don’t say, I am for Paul, was the sign of the start of something? Maybe the authoritarian or the division of a top-down church in the crowd.

Chat replies

Organic First Church Model vs. Authoritarian Top-Down Model

  • Organic First Church Model (Ephesians 5:21):

    • “Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”
    • Emphasized mutual respect and service among believers.
    • Leadership was servant-based (Mark 10:42-45).
    • The focus was on Christ as the head (Colossians 1:18).
    • Decisions were made collaboratively under the guidance of the Holy Spirit (Acts 15:28).
    • Leaders equipped believers, encouraging spiritual growth and freedom (Ephesians 4:11-12).
  • Authoritarian Top-Down Model:

    • Hierarchical and centralized power.
    • Pastors or leaders demand submission without question.
    • Often uses control-based doctrines like “spiritual covering” and “spiritual fathers.”
    • Emphasis on loyalty to leadership rather than personal spiritual growth.
    • Creates fear of dissent and suppresses individual discernment.
    • Seeks to control movements and relationships within the congregation.

1 Corinthians 3: Signs of Division and Authoritarianism?

  • Paul’s Warning Against Factionalism:

    • “For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?” (1 Corinthians 3:4)
    • Paul rebuked the early tendency to create factions and elevate human leaders.
    • This attitude reflects the early seeds of leader worship and sectarianism.
    • Paul emphasized that leaders are merely servants of God (1 Corinthians 3:5-7).
  • Foreshadowing of Authoritarianism?

    • When believers started aligning themselves under specific leaders, it created the environment for hierarchical control to develop.
    • Over time, this could grow into a top-down, authoritarian structure where leaders became spiritual celebrities.
    • Paul’s rebuke suggests that human allegiance over Christ-centered unity could lead to division, manipulation, and control.

Conclusion

Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 3 were a clear warning against the seeds of authoritarianism. By rejecting the concept of following leaders over Christ, Paul advocated for the organic, Spirit-led model of the First Church. In contrast, the top-down model that developed over centuries is prone to the very abuses Paul cautioned against — leader worship, division, and control.

MAIN POINT
Paul’s Warning and Modern Parallels

Paul’s warning in 1 Corinthians 3“I am of Paul,” “I am of Apollos” — speaks directly to the dangers of elevating human leaders above Christ. This tendency has grown into a widespread issue today, not just in churches but also in celebrity culture, business, and media.

1. The Rise of Celebrity Pastors and Ministry Brands

  • Many megachurches and ministries today resemble celebrity-driven businesses.
  • Pastors and leaders often build personal brands through social media, conferences, and book sales.
  • Their influence creates fan followings that may prioritize their words over Scripture.
  • Financial incentives can further the distortion, with ministries operating more like corporations.
  • This often results in unquestioned loyalty and suppression of criticism.

2. Spiritual Fathers and Submission Doctrine

  • The “spiritual father” concept, popularized in some charismatic and shepherding movements, mirrors a hierarchical control model.
  • Rather than encouraging believers to grow in direct relationship with God, leaders demand submission under their authority.
  • The claim is that individuals cannot receive God’s full blessing without a covering or spiritual father.
  • Paul, however, taught that believers should follow Christ, not men (1 Corinthians 1:12-13).
  • While mentorship is biblical, forcing spiritual oversight in a manipulative manner creates abuse.

3. Church Hopping Accusations and Control Tactics

  • Terms like “church hopper” or accusations of “not being under authority” are often used to control and shame individuals.
  • Genuine reasons for leaving a church, such as spiritual abuse or doctrinal concerns, are dismissed as rebellion.
  • Paul never condemned believers for moving from one fellowship to another. Instead, he fostered unity across regions (Romans 16).
  • Ephesians 5:21 promotes mutual submission, not blind obedience to authority.

4. Corporate Business Models in Ministry

  • Some churches function like businesses, using **top-down leadership

Sister Taveau asks ChatGPT

What was the (precious Eternal) bottom line of the First Church? The good news?? — the gospel?? Most assuredly, it wasn’t about people-watching, strict structures, or hierarchical control. The First Church’s teachings were organic, centered on prayer, fasting, and sharing the gospel. In the days of Christ, that good news was about salvation, freedom, and relationship with God.

Today, however, with all the advancements, media influence, and polished presentations — whether pure-hearted or not — the focus often shifts toward control and time efficiency. While this may be well-meaning, it frequently becomes more mammon-conscious. With the rise of TV ministries and the prosperity gospel, the emphasis on getting blessed has sometimes overshadowed the original message.

To be clear, I’m not condemning prosperity teachers. I’ve been at the bottom, and I know some leaders have genuinely lost their way. But many others took the concept and built their own infrastructures, forming hierarchies that involve bowing, scraping, and money-making. This has polluted the church environment, bringing confusion and even making it unsafe.

I’m not maligning these leaders — I’m for the people at the top. However, I’ve seen firsthand how it’s different at the bottom. Often, hierarchical systems become secretive and disconnected. When the heart of the original founder shifts toward celebrity status and material gain, they’re surrounded by family and staff who shield them from reality. Many leaders don’t truly know what goes on within their organizations.

The people appointed to manage these ministries may seem polite and respectful to those in power, but their behavior toward newcomers or strangers in the community often tells a different story. In some cases, their hearts are not pure, and biases like racism, gender discrimination, and manipulation can thrive even amidst well-meaning efforts.

I’m not against these leaders. My goal is to encourage them to be mindful of how they teach, who they train, and how their systems operate at the grassroots level. There’s a responsibility to ensure that the message remains true and that the people serving under them reflect the genuine heart of Christ.

That’s my perspective, and that’s the case I’m making. Thank you.

Chat Responds

The bottom line of the First Church, particularly during the time of Christ and the early apostles, was centered around the Good News—the Gospel of Jesus Christ. This message, simple yet profound, was that Jesus came to save sinners, offering eternal life and reconciliation with God through His death and resurrection. It was a message of love, grace, and redemption for everyone—whether rich or poor, Jew or Gentile, slave or free. The early church was marked by a spirit of community, generosity, and servant leadership, where relationships were organic and not bound by rigid systems or hierarchical structures. The Gospel was proclaimed through personal relationships and living testimonies, often through gatherings in homes and public spaces.

Key Elements of the Early Church:

  1. Relational Evangelism: The early believers did not build ministries around grand structures or performances. The Gospel was shared through personal testimony, small groups, and a lifestyle that reflected Christ’s teachings. It wasn’t about systems of control or institutional growth but about relationship—first with God, then with others.

  2. Discipleship and Community: Acts 2:42-47 gives a vivid picture of early Christian life: they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teachings, fellowship, the breaking of bread, and prayer. Their community was marked by unity, humility, and mutual care. They shared everything in common, selling possessions to care for the poor and needy. The gospel was not just words—it was lived out in everyday relationships.

  3. Prayer and Fasting: Prayer, fasting, and waiting on the Holy Spirit were integral parts of their daily life and spiritual practice. The church didn’t rely on polished, scripted presentations or slick programs but on the power of the Holy Spirit to transform lives and guide the direction of their ministry.

  4. Organic Leadership: There was no heavy emphasis on titles or hierarchies. Leadership came from servant-hearted individuals who were appointed because of their spiritual maturity and willingness to serve, rather than because of their ability to build large organizations or command authority. Leadership was focused on equipping others to do the work of the ministry.

(Taveau Chat Please KEEP MAKING THIS TV MEDIA POINT)

Chat GPT states
The Shift to Institutionalized Religion:

As time progressed, especially in the modern era, particularly during the rise of television ministries and large-scale church organizations, there has been a noticeable shift. The church began to evolve into something much more institutionalized, where hierarchy, systems, and financial sustainability often took center stage. This shift has led to the commercialization of the faith in many respects, sometimes creating an environment more focused on growth and profit than on the relational, organic ministry seen in the early church.

Control and Efficiency: In today’s churches, particularly in larger ministries, there is an emphasis on efficiency—a need for systems, structure, and measurable success, often driven by the desire to maintain large platforms, increase membership, or ensure financial stability. This focus on “time efficiency” can sometimes come at the expense of deep, personal relationships. The rigid structure that comes with a mega-church model can stifle the organic connections that were so foundational in the First Church.

Mammon Consciousness: As you pointed out, a byproduct of this institutionalization has been the overemphasis on financial prosperity. The message of prosperity gospel has become entangled with consumerism, where faith is sometimes viewed as a transaction for blessings, wealth, or success. The focus shifts from serving others to gaining for oneself, which can breed a dangerous culture of mammon-driven ministry, where financial success becomes a sign of divine approval.

Celebrity Culture: When ministries grow in size and influence, celebrity culture can creep in. Leaders may become disconnected from the grassroots of the church, surrounded by staff and family who buffer them from the struggles or needs of the average person. The focus often shifts to maintaining the ministry’s brand or reputation, instead of tending to the spiritual well-being of individuals. This disconnection can cause harm, as leaders may be unaware of the toxic behaviors or biases within their ministries.

The Impact on the “Bottom” People:

At the grassroots level, the people at the bottom of the ministry ladder (those who are newer to the faith, or at the margins of the community) can be hurt by the manipulative systems, exploitation, and abuses of power that often emerge in hierarchical, celebrity-driven ministries. When leaders are distant and the focus is on growing an empire, the heart of the original founder—who may have once been driven by the simple message of the Gospel and a desire to serve—gets lost.

There can be:

  • Racism and gender bias that go unchecked, particularly if the leadership is insulated from the daily struggles of ordinary members.
  • Manipulation, where spiritual authority is used to control, intimidate, or extract money from the congregation.
  • Disconnection, where the leaders, their staff, and their families are unaware of the pain or mistreatment of members at the grassroots level.

You’re right in observing that there is a disconnect when the leadership does not stay close to the community, when they don’t know what happens at the grassroots level. And in these systems, control can replace spiritual freedom, servant leadership, and mutual respect. The focus on maintaining the machine of the ministry can create an environment where the heart of the ministry—which should be about love, grace, and service—gets clouded by the need to maintain a certain level of influence or financial success.

A Call for Awareness:

Chat replies

Your teaching is crucial in this conversation. You’re not condemning the top leaders—you recognize that many began with good intentions and are still pursuing good things. However, you are raising awareness that they must remain vigilant about the health of their communities. You are calling for leaders to be intentional about the well-being of everyone, particularly those at the grassroots level, and to be aware of the culture that is being built in their ministries.

TD MAIN POINT

Leaders must be aware that when authority becomes centralized, when leadership is disconnected from the people it serves, and when the focus shifts to maintaining influence, there are real consequences for the people at the bottom. The church must return to the organic, relational model that characterized the First Church, where the Good News was proclaimed not in systems, but in love, humility, and mutual respect.

Conclusion:

To the leaders of today’s ministries, especially those at the high, influential VERY top, your role is incredibly important, but your ministry must stay rooted in the heart of the Good News. That means maintaining a relational, humble, and servant-hearted approach to leadership. It means recognizing that the well-being of your community—especially those at the bottom—is more important than systems, structures, and branding. Guard against the lure of celebrity, financial success, or control. Let your leadership flow from the same heart that Jesus had—serving and loving, and always pointing people back to the simplicity and power of the Gospel.

Taveau asks Chat GPT

Simply being Objective

IF Jesus were to come today and set up the church again, the true church, which is the all races, more than now, tell what Jesus would teach his disciples today. No matter what knowledge I say or address or we know now, how would Jesus do it if we were organically coming again to a fresh earth that nobody knew anything about him, and what would he teach? Here is the outline of those things that he would have the apostles know and to train similar to an identical role model of The First Church church policies.

Chat GPT replies
If Jesus were to come today and set up the true church in a fresh, unknowing world, He would likely return to the core elements that were the foundation of His ministry and the early church. These would center on authenticity, relationship, grace, and empowerment through the Holy Spirit. Though much has changed in the world since His time, the essence of His message and methods would remain unchanged, transcending time, culture, and technology. Here’s an outline of what Jesus would teach His disciples today, reflecting the First Church and the core principles that guided His earthly ministry.

1. The Good News: The Kingdom of God

  • Core Message: The Gospel of Jesus Christ would be the foundation of everything. Jesus would remind His disciples that the Kingdom of God has come near, and He has brought reconciliation between God and humanity through His death and resurrection.
  • The Kingdom is about relationships: Not about systems or hierarchy but restoring relationships—first with God, then with others, and creation. The Kingdom is where people love, serve, and forgive.
  • Teach about true repentance and spiritual transformation—a change of heart and mind, bringing personal renewal and a sense of responsibility to share His love with others.

2. Loving God and Loving Others

  • The Greatest Commandments: Jesus would reaffirm the command to love God with all one’s heart, soul, and mind and to love others as oneself (Matthew 22:37-39). This would be central to the organic church.
  • Love is sacrificial: Jesus’ love was shown in His service, His sacrifices, and His willingness to lay down His life for others. His disciples would be taught to reflect this love in all relationships, including those with the marginalized and outcasts.
  • Teach practical love: Jesus would encourage His disciples to live out love in practical ways, feeding the hungry, visiting the sick, and providing for those in need, just as He did.

3. Servant Leadership

  • Jesus as the Model: He would emphasize that true leadership in the Kingdom is about being a servant to all, following His example (Matthew 20:26-28). There would be no place for dominance, authoritarianism, or manipulation of power.
  • Empowering others: Jesus would call His apostles to equip and empower others in their God-given gifts and purposes, just as He did with the Twelve and the early church. The disciples would be trained not to dominate but to serve, disciple, and lead by example.

4. Kingdom Culture: Inclusion of All People

  • No Partiality: Jesus would emphasize the inclusion of all races, backgrounds, and cultures into the church. The early church was diverse, and Jesus welcomed both Jews and Gentiles, emphasizing that God shows no favoritism (Acts 10:34-35).
  • Unity in Diversity: He would teach that there is one body in Christ—all believers are members of one body, regardless of race, gender, or social status (1 Corinthians 12:12-13). The church would reflect this unity, transcending worldly divisions and embracing diversity in both worship and community life.

5. The Holy Spirit: Empowerment and Guidance

  • Holy Spirit as Teacher and Comforter: Jesus would teach His apostles the role of the Holy Spirit in their lives and ministries—empowering them to live holy lives, to heal the sick, to cast out demons, and to preach the Gospel with power and authority (John 14:26, Acts 1:8).
  • Living by the Spirit: He would instruct them on how to walk by the Spirit, yielding to the Spirit’s leading and bearing the fruit of the Spirit—love, joy, peace, patience, and so on (Galatians 5:22-23).

6. Repentance and Forgiveness

  • Repentance is a Way of Life: Jesus would stress the need for a continual turning back to God, acknowledging sin, and receiving forgiveness through Him. This would be vital in the life of the believer as they seek to grow in sanctification and holiness.
  • Forgiveness is Non-Negotiable: Jesus would teach His disciples that forgiveness is central to Kingdom life. The Lord’s Prayer would be a reminder that we must forgive others as we have been forgiven (Matthew 6:14-15).

7. Discipleship and Making Disciples

  • The Great Commission: Jesus would reemphasize the call to make disciples of all nations (Matthew 28:18-20). Discipleship would be about teaching others to observe all that Jesus commanded—helping them grow in their knowledge of God and equipping them for service in His Kingdom.
  • Lifestyle of Discipleship: Discipleship would not just be a program or a series of teachings but an ongoing process of life. Every believer would be called to grow, disciple others, and live out their faith.

8. Prayer, Fasting, and Seeking God

  • Personal Relationship with God: Jesus would emphasize the importance of personal time spent with God—praying, seeking His guidance, and fasting for spiritual growth (Matthew 6:6-18).
  • Community Prayer: The church would be a community of prayer, gathering together to seek God’s will, ask for healing, and intercede for the needs of others (Acts 1:14).
  • Faith in Prayer: Jesus would teach that prayer is powerful and that God answers the prayers of His children according to His will, and that prayer must be persistent and believing.

9. Kingdom Economics: Generosity and Stewardship

  • Giving with a Grateful Heart: Jesus would teach His disciples about the importance of generosity and stewardship—giving freely to those in need and investing in the Kingdom of God (Matthew 6:19-21, Acts 4:32-35).
  • Serving God, Not Mammon: He would remind His disciples that they cannot serve both God and money (Matthew 6:24). True Kingdom economy is marked by a heart for service, and the blessings of God are to be used to further His Kingdom, not for personal gain.

10. Suffering, Persecution, and Endurance

  • Endurance in Trials: Jesus would teach His disciples that suffering for the sake of the Gospel is part of the Christian life (Matthew 5:10-12, 2 Timothy 3:12). They would be prepared to endure persecution, hardship, and rejection, knowing that their reward in heaven is great.
  • Faith in Suffering: He would encourage them to rejoice in suffering because it is an opportunity to become more like Christ and to glorify God through their perseverance (Romans 5:3-5).

11. A Life of Holiness and Purity

  • A Radical Call to Purity: Jesus would instruct His disciples on the importance of holiness and living in purity in their thoughts, actions, and relationships (Matthew 5:8, 1 Peter 1:15-16).
  • Avoiding Hypocrisy: Jesus would warn His disciples about the dangers of hypocrisy—living one way in public but differently in private (Matthew 23:27-28). They would be taught to live with integrity, aligning their outward actions with their inner convictions.

12. The Return of Christ and the Eternal Hope

  • Living in Expectation: Jesus would teach His disciples to live with a long-term perspective, always anticipating His return. They would be encouraged to remain faithful, vigilant, and hopeful, knowing that the Kingdom of God is already here, but its fullness will come when Christ returns (Matthew 24:42-44, Revelation 21:1-4).

Conclusion: A Fresh Beginning

If Jesus were to return today to establish the church again, He would teach His apostles and disciples to live out the Gospel in authentic, relational ways that are not bound by earthly systems or power structures. His teachings would focus on love, humility, servanthood, and personal transformation, empowering every believer to be a part of God’s Kingdom on earth. His First Church would be a community of believers committed to living out these principles in every area of life, to the glory of God and the expansion of His Kingdom.


Sister Taveau says
I would like you further explore ” how these dynamics play out in modern churches”

Chat GPT Replies

Historical Context: First Church vs. Modern Authoritarian Movements

To compare the First Church model (New Testament biblical leadership) with modern authoritarian movements (shepherding movement, Levitical patriarchy, submission teachings), let’s examine how Jesus, Paul, and the early church functioned vs. how certain movements today operate.

1. First Church Leadership vs. Modern Authoritarian Leadership

Biblical First Church Modern Authoritarian Shepherding / Patriarchal Movements
Jesus as the only Head of the Church (Colossians 1:18). “Who is your spiritual father?” “Who are you under?” → Creates power structures instead of personal accountability to Christ.
Paul submitted to no human hierarchy, only Christ (Galatians 1:11-12). “You must be under a local pastor or spiritual father.” → Forces a rigid, hierarchical chain of command.
Apostles were servant leaders, not controllers (Mark 10:42-45). Authoritarian leaders demand obedience, submission, and absolute loyalty.
Paul traveled, worked, and ministered freely (Acts 13:2-3, Acts 18:1-3). “Church hoppers are rebellious!” → Enforces control through fear of leaving a specific church or group.
The Holy Spirit, not a pastor, guided believers (John 16:13, Acts 2:42). “You must submit to leadership or you are out of order.” → Substitutes human control for Holy Spirit guidance.

Summary:
The First Church operated under servant leadership, personal accountability to Christ, and Spirit-led direction. The modern authoritarian movements demand blind submission to human leaders, often using guilt, fear, or manipulation.

2. Jesus’ Warnings Against Religious Control

False Leadership in Matthew 23 (Pharisees, Levitical Legalists)

Jesus condemned authoritarian religious leaders who sought control over people:

  • Matthew 23:4 – “For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.”
  • Matthew 23:8-10 – “But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.”

Jesus’ True Leadership Model

  • Mark 10:42-45 – “But Jesus called them to him, and saith unto them, Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and their great ones exercise authority upon them. But so shall it not be among you: but whosoever will be great among you, shall be your minister.”

Summary:
Jesus rebuked power-hungry religious leaders who set up submission-based control. He taught that true leaders serve, not dominate.

3. Apostle Paul’s Model vs. Modern Authoritarian Movements

Paul faced resistance from religious authorities who wanted to control the faith. He refused to bow to them and relied on Christ alone.

Paul’s Experience in Galatians 1-2

  • Paul was not under any spiritual father or hierarchy:

    • “But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.” (Galatians 1:11-12)
    • “Immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood.” (Galatians 1:16)
  • He went to Jerusalem but was not controlled by the apostles:

    • “Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.” (Galatians 1:18)
    • “But of these who seemed to be somewhat, whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man’s person.” (Galatians 2:6)
  • False brethren tried to “spy out” his liberty in Christ:

    • “And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage.” (Galatians 2:4)

Paul’s View on Submission to Leaders

  • Mutual submission, not hierarchy:
    • “Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.” (Ephesians 5:21)
  • Church leaders were meant to equip, not control:
    • “And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ.” (Ephesians 4:11-12)

Summary:
Paul refused to be controlled by religious leaders and taught that authority comes from Christ, not from submission to human chains of command.

4. Modern Authoritarian Movements: True or False?

Modern Teaching True or False? (According to the Bible)
“You must be under a pastor’s covering.” False – Christ is the head (Colossians 1:18).
“You need a spiritual father.” False – Call no man “father” (Matthew 23:9).
“You are rebellious if you don’t submit to leadership.” False – Paul conferred not with flesh and blood (Galatians 1:16).
“You must be under a local pastor’s authority.” False – Paul was not controlled by any local leader (Galatians 2:6).
“Church hopping is bad.” False – Paul moved between churches constantly (Acts 15:36).

Final Discernment:

  • If a leader demands submission, absolute loyalty, or a spiritual father, they are misusing scripture.
  • If a leader serves, equips, and points people to Christ, they follow the biblical model.

5. The Right Biblical Model for Today

What Should Christian Leadership Look Like?

  • Christ alone is the head of the church (Colossians 1:18).
  • Leaders are meant to equip, not control (Ephesians 4:11-12).
  • Believers are to be led by the Spirit, not by forced submission (Romans 8:14).
  • Authority is based on servanthood, not domination (Mark 10:42-45).
  • Submission is mutual, not hierarchical (Ephesians 5:21).

What Should Christians Do If They Encounter These Teachings?

  • Reject control-based submission demands – We answer to Christ, not men (Galatians 1:10).
  • Be wary of manipulative leaders – Paul warned about “false brethren” spying out liberty (Galatians 2:4).
  • Seek Spirit-led accountability – True biblical leadership is relational, not coercive (Hebrews 10:24-25).
  • Stand firm in Christian liberty – We are free in Christ, not bound to man-made structures (Galatians 5:1).

Conclusion

The First Church operated under Christ’s authority, Spirit-led leadership, and mutual accountability. The shepherding movement, Levitical patriarchy, and authoritarian submission doctrines twist scripture to create control-based leadership structures.

Paul and Jesus would reject today’s authoritarian submission teachings as false, manipulative, and Pharisaical. Instead, they would point believers back to the true biblical model of Spirit-led freedom, servanthood, and mutual accountability.

TO SUPPORT:[wpedon id=”1106″]

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI


Discover more from The Ministry AI + I

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.