Rated an Entertaining BR (Binge Reading)

MINISTRY AI AND I

PART 23 TROUBLING THE CHRISTIAN PATRIARCHY
CHRISTIAN LEADER WOMEN WHO TROUBLED THESE
“Send in the LP”

Ephesians 5:21 “Mutual submission in the fear of the Lord “**

**Apostle Paul, First Church Ministry, Family, Married, Community “Respectful, Chain of Command” 

all leader, lay, servant leader persons

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved under international copyright laws,  in conjunction with AI

[wpedon id=”1107″]                           For the Saints All Races, Preferred Ministry and Global Styles

---

WORD CONCERNING THIS FROM DR TAVEAU

To be very honest, growing up or now, I’ve never had ANY MAN issues. I think “humans” first, not “type.” I base that on my history, my family, and on Paul, who stated, “I determined not to know anything about anyone, other than Christ and Him crucified.” The Word of Faith says something similar: “Faith is not moved by what you see, hear, or feel. It’s ONLY MOVED by the inward witness of God’s Holy Spirit and the Word of God.”

Furthermore, the oft-quoted Paul said, “When you put on Christ, there is no male, female (black, white, brown), bound or free.” But I live to see that Bible perspective fully adhered to by the massive grassroots Levitical Patriarchy and their tribal LM…

Note fully, please—senior leader, junior lay—that I was a non-biased Jesus Person, and I never wanted to do this. I just told Father God, way back when, that I would do whatever HE SAID to do, and that is ALL.

So take that up with HIM, the Master, you who might differ. And it does NOT BOTHER ME if YOU do not believe in Christian leader women, for I have my own God-given beliefs, rooted in Paul’s command in Philippians 2:12 to “work out YOUR OWN SALVATION” and also Galatians 1:1-2 / Acts 17:17, which technically— for the ministry leader Body of Christ to know— is “under submission to all” according to St. Paul (not all white) in Ephesians 5:21.

And let it be known that THIS TYPE OF HISTORICAL CALL brings MUCH accusation, misunderstanding, hatred, evil eye, jealousy, false witness, ambush, and a lot of demonic trials. Yes, this includes mega and micro occult witch-watching but also Levitical Patriarchism, L Matriarch (with their many mean, subservient, scowling, authoritarian dowagers), and legalistic presumptions: (yet all of this is THEIR CHOICE for I prefer non dysfunction and NORMALCY now) yet I feel deep concern for both the Christian women, girls, singles, single parent, elders and rising future Church, ..as well as for the MEN who disrespect, use, brand, label and are foolish enough to “presume that they OWN human ministry attending real persons, meaning be they women or men, black or white or brown

I am AGAINST ALL PEOPLE USING,BIAS DIMINISHING,  ABUSING and STEREOTYPING

 I list beneath the sort of ‘fellowship among these styles of ministry saints (junior ministry” Vast Wannabeism mostly) so here goes a small list  what “THIS PERSON” Person Triggers as a new visitor, area local minister,human person on a Mission  (Note; That is said mainly on behalf of the more timid,shy, fearful and past abused, many of whom are single, single in the things of Christ, and this is WHAT gets handed out by the Pharisee ‘You are not submitted to OUR KIND of Governing authority type of crowd.(Senseless saint on saint ambitious attack due to THERE (not OUR) religious views, Holy Bible scripture VERSIONS of THIS tradition, law, their revered local customs.

• “Because it’s a SHE is NOT ABLE TO COMPREHEND , TO TEACH SUCH.”
• “SHE is NOT submitted.”
• “SHE needs to be ‘covered’ by (ALL) men.”
• “SHE LOOKS like SHE is CONTROLLING.”
• “Surely SHE is out to take OUR CHRISTIAN MAN.”
• “SHE desires to TAKE THE PLACE of a Ministry man.”
• “SHE is the pastor’s wife, not the head chief apostle of a Movement.”
• (WHEN SHE IS MARRIED)” Surely HE IS HENPECKED.”
• SHE is OUR private Property

This look, style, ministry person provokes uncertainty, far off fear based speculation rumors:(“The LP Heard Mentality” (Charismatics only)

• “I hear She’s gay (TD responds because.. 1. A office Deborah requires a God SENT Lapidoth. 2.WHY SETTLE? I ‘m not “the needy” type…am NOT settling for dysfunctional Christians (or fragile, overly religious, squeaky clean Mama’s Boy “goody two shoes” OR   impure (roving eye) OR (another) Yes Men.” 3. Quote this: A  loving ,mature, weaker vessel must have a “stronger” vessel to make the HER feel that way (Example Deborah required her Lapidoth)
• “She looks too strong,therefore SHE is not ‘submitted’ and ” NOT the Bible weaker vessel ” (too bad, means you’re a major WELP)
• “I bet She’ s bossy controlling..she’s not LP arm candy, and dislikes shallow, docile, vapid Barbie pastel pink.”
• “I bet She’s one of those ministry suffragettes, a ‘mean women’s libber.'” (say a non biased”ho ho!)
• I heard SHE sleeps around. (suspected  by all who had many partners outside of wedlock, part of the turf for almost ANY recognized, local, national  woman leader)

It’s only another SHE who must be “Under ALL US LP type of men.” And if this person finds herself on Eli’s (1 Samuel) spiritual human turf, then SHE is presumed to be “our LP Ministry property” OR “another white witch” OR surely “a Jezebel vixen, waitress, and/or future concubine.”

This is said based on discouraging, defiling, and time-wasting—if not tragic—discoveries when out among the “prophetic charismatics,” whom I refer to as WELP (Western European Levitical Patriarchs) in many similar kinds of ministries.

NOTE: This is mostly seen around the Bible Belt, media-affected… but was a per capita giant SHOCK in DFW—and it changed me, my white WASP perspective, and caused me to study Bible First Church, men’s and women’s roles, and all governing authority doctrines.

A SINGLES ASIDE (inserted brief bonus)

 FOR THOSE WHO “Desire to be married” Teaching: PS Contented Not to Be Wed If NO Worthy Candidate Appears

A Singles Mini Training teaching (which TD previously adheres to, but this verse helps express it. PS I accidently (God coincidence) stumbled upon it  social media and it ties in with Sister’s own I Timothy 6:6 “Godly contentment is great gain” and in peace)

“Whoso finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favour of the LORD.”Proverbs 18:22

This is the teaching:

FOCUS: “He who finds a wife finds a good thing, etc.”

To Pastor , Sister Taveau

(MAJOR POINT) this implies that while the Godly man is (led by the Holy Spirit)  hunting and looking for the God-sent, chosen wife,

(POINT)However the female who desires to find her God-sent, true man is NOT out there hunting or going out looking, marketing herself, going to the bars, clubs, singles scenes…NOT she is Secure in God’s Timing.Rather SHE is getting ready. How? She is working on fulfilling and BEING HER BIGGEST, BEST GOD CALLED AUTHENTIC TRUE blessed “SELF” and does want to COME DOWN from that High BUSINESS, MINISTRY  Call to ‘settle’

And while SHE is waiting, trusting not pushing. SHE is honing her life, craft, calling, ministry /business.  See it as FULLY expanding, and being FREE to FULL grow, develop and prosper” (To get her INNER and OUTER act together)

1. In the LORD
2. In business, ministry, or real life

So that when he comes along,he knows what he’s getting, and he will have to understand if he is Christian man enough to handle it.

NOTE: The She might have to PASS on different ones who cannot HANDLE IT (even for a long time, years) WHILE SHE IS making big progress a spirit and standard for EXCELLENCE, PROVISION, MINISTRY in her own right (her own business, ministry success)

NEITHER will that she person presume that SHE must settle FOR HIM to love her. NO, SHE values God,her God call and will trust, give into nor lower here special SELF in order to compete with online media, peers, the World…Also she will NOT ALLOW HERSELF to be disrespected, devalued, demeaned, abused,  used, owned or dominated.

So the TEACHING  is THE MEN are out prayerfully “looking” ( Hunting), while the WOMEN are raising their GAME to the BEST of their Ability (  IMPROVING, GOING FOR IT!) Means: are doing , being and also “growing accustomed” to living and GETTING THEIR BEST….. so that when..if,  a “possible Christian mate “genuinely does  comes along they will not SETTLE for LESS, nor LOWER THEMSELF,  to “be comfortable” with ANYONE lesser.

TAVEAU SAYS: THIS IS TO   “DODGE THE BULLET”
TD’s Advice…. courtesy of King Solomon, Song of Solomon “Dress like a wall, not like a door” (God’s hunting gentlemen , if they are pure, mature and aware…want a women they “keep” which means one whom they( way down on the deep inside) will genuinely ‘respect”)Neither will these dress or do inappropriate things to ‘Attract and HUNT a man” .Neither will they ” DISRESPECT them- SELF by acting less than  WHOM they are GOD  CALLED to LIFE, MINISTRY, BUSINESS, FAMILY.. BE))

Note: We ought to spread this around!

NEXT…DISCOVERY OF THE GUYS SUBCULTURES  (2005-2020)

Living among the deep Southwest, surrounded by LP Patrichians and occult “masters seeking indentured slaves,” made me THIS OUTSPOKEN— but not for myself alone, but FOR THE MANY LEADER WOMEN of all ages, stages, races, and styles.

That was the CHIEF wide-awake, disconcerting, needless Christian ministry leader discovery and human-served AN EAGLE EYE OPENER and continual dysfunctional shock. For I had been raised by a clean, mature, respectful, kind gentleman— a dear, laughing father, who was also a teacher and Sr. Pastor. He and all of the extended family were the same; there was nothing like WELP in my history of family experience. And there are MANY who are not like that today. But it was the huge ambitious ministry subculture, which I deemed “Levitical patriarchy”—THE C PATRIARCHY IN MINISTRY. Not servant leader. (Mostly the Good Ole Persons East Coast Shepherding movement, plus a Salem witch trials vibe reading, and not pure Holy Ghost. Add in the mixture of showbiz plus wannabeism, and it is WHY I now teach!)

Back to my genuinely saved (non-poor), servant-hearted, blessed, humorous, gifted scholar, patient dear father. He was a Human Being, an Equal Opportunity, Real Respectful Person, who had fun with his family, his teammate/collaborator wife, and dwelled in Ephesians 5:21 (non-patriarchal, non-authoritarian) Apostle Paul “mutual submission in the holy fear of the Lord” with one and all. I was raised by and under that, and I have had NO REASON to be “liberated,” for I was raised that way!

I would, however, like to say I never wanted to be women’s lib. However, after the deep Southwest Good Old Man’s Trial, I have much more respect for that and can see the reason— PRO and CON.

BUT I am for identity and respect IN CHRIST. “Neither MY ESTEEM nor MY IDENTITY  are  in my gender, my looks, my race, my politics,size, my education, my ‘stuff,’ my ministry, or my pedigree.” So THERE!

NOW… CHRISTIAN LEADER WOMEN WHO TROUBLED THE LP OF THEIR DAY

THE ADVENTURE BEGINS

JOAN OF ARC

TD Asks Chat GPT about Joan of Arc
Was Joan of Arc a maven, a matriarch, a liberator? What was Joan of Arc? Was she part of the matriarchy or just a single individual?

ChatGPT said:

Joan of Arc (1412–1431) was a liberator, a maven, and a singular historical figure, but she was not a matriarch in the traditional sense. Here’s why:

1. Liberator

Joan of Arc was a military leader who played a key role in the Hundred Years’ War, leading French forces to victory against the English and helping to secure the coronation of Charles VII. She was a liberator in both a national and symbolic sense, as she fought for France’s freedom under divine inspiration.

2. Maven

Joan had extraordinary knowledge and insight, particularly in military strategy and faith-based leadership, despite lacking formal training. She claimed divine visions from saints, which guided her actions, and she became an influential figure in both warfare and spiritual matters.

3. Matriarch? No.

A matriarch typically refers to a woman who leads a family, tribe, or community over time. Joan was a warrior and an inspirational leader, but she did not establish or oversee a dynasty, family, or lasting governance.

4. Part of a Matriarchy? No.

Joan of Arc lived in a strongly patriarchal society where men dominated political, military, and religious leadership. She was an anomaly, not part of a matriarchal system. Her influence was personal and divine rather than institutional.

5. Just a Single Individual?

While Joan of Arc was an individual, her impact was far greater than just one person’s actions. She became a symbol of faith, courage, and national identity, later canonized as a saint. Her legacy still inspires leaders and feminists today.

In summary, Joan of Arc was a maven and a liberator, but not a matriarch or part of a matriarchal system. She was a unique figure who defied societal norms and left an enduring legacy.

Taveau is curious and asks Chat GPT

Did Joan or Arc have or did men have, issues with Joan of Arc inside the church or outside?

Chat GPT responds:

Yes, Joan of Arc faced significant opposition from men both inside and outside the Church—politically, religiously, and militarily. Her leadership, gender, and claims of divine guidance challenged societal norms, leading to hostility from various groups.

1. Opposition from the Church and Religious Authorities

• Clergy Skepticism: Many churchmen were suspicious of Joan’s visions and her claim that God had chosen her to lead France.
• Condemnation as a Heretic: The pro-English Bishop Pierre Cauchon led a politically motivated church trial, accusing her of heresy, witchcraft, and wearing men’s clothing (which she did for practical reasons in battle and captivity).
• Execution by Burning: Despite her victories for France, she was convicted by an English-controlled court and burned at the stake in 1431.

2. Opposition from Men in Politics and Military

• French Nobles’ Jealousy: Many male military leaders resented Joan’s influence over King Charles VII. Some viewed her as a threat to traditional power structures.
• English Hatred: The English saw her as a dangerous enemy and sought to discredit her. They used religious accusations as a political weapon.
• King Charles VII’s Betrayal: After Joan was captured, the French king (whom she helped put on the throne) did little to rescue her, likely due to political pressure.

3. Did All Men Oppose Her?

No—many men supported her. She had devoted followers in the military, including Jean de Dunois and La Hire, and some church figures later worked to clear her name. In 1456, Pope Callixtus III overturned her conviction, declaring her a martyr.

Conclusion

Joan of Arc deeply challenged the male-dominated structures of both the Church and society, leading to her persecution. However, she also had loyal supporters who recognized her divine mission. Her trial and execution were more about power and politics than true Christian doctrine.

Taveau asks:

Can we assume that leader Joan of Arc was opposed by the Levitical Patriachy in the Church? By the Patriarchs(non religious) and in general by men, or who?

ChatGPT responds:

We can say that Joan of Arc was opposed by the patriarchy in both religious and political forms, but not necessarily by “men in general.” Her opposition came primarily from specific power structures rather than all men. Here’s a breakdown:

1. Christian Levitical Patriarchy?

• Partially, but not entirely. Joan’s enemies in the Church, like Bishop Pierre Cauchon, were part of a rigid religious system that sought to maintain control. However, their opposition was politically motivated, as they were aligned with the English.
• The term Levitical Patriarchy suggests a strict Old Testament priestly system, but medieval Catholicism had different structures. While churchmen did oppose her, it was more about protecting political and institutional power rather than strictly following Levitical law.

2. The Patriarchy (Secular and Religious)?

• Yes. Joan challenged male authority in a time when women were expected to be submissive. She took on a military role, dressed as a man, and claimed direct guidance from God, all of which threatened the male-dominated status quo in both Church and State.
• Both English and French male leaders were uneasy about her influence. Many French nobles resented her success because she outshined them on the battlefield.

3. Men in General?

• No. Not all men opposed her—many fought alongside her. Jean de Dunois, La Hire, and other French commanders believed in her leadership. Even some clergy later worked to overturn her conviction.
• The common French people, both men and women, saw her as a hero and a divinely appointed leader.

4. Who Specifically Opposed Her?

• The English monarchy and military, who viewed her as a serious threat.
• French nobles and court officials who feared her influence over King Charles VII.
• Bishop Pierre Cauchon and English-aligned clergy, who used religious trials to justify her execution.
• King Charles VII (indirectly), as he abandoned her to her fate after she had secured his throne.

Conclusion

Joan of Arc was primarily opposed by powerful men within the Church and State who feared her influence, rather than all men or an overarching Levitical system. Her trial and execution were driven by politics, power struggles, and gender bias, making her both a martyr and a symbol of resistance against oppressive structures.

Taveau Asks
Can we state that Joan of Arc was opposed by the Christian Levitical Patriarchy, the patriarchy, men in general, or who?

Chat GPT responds:

Taveau asks Chat GPT
Please discuss Lapidoth, husband of Israeli Prophet Judge Deborah:

.What did Lapidoth do? How did he handle Deborah? Were they married in Ephesians 521 technically even though it was the Old Testament? Was it chain of command? Did he approve? Was prophetess warrior Mighty Deborah the weaker vessel of the two?

Chat GPT AI responds:

Apostle Taveau asks

In all of the Bible, Christian history, American and Global, every race ,were there any Christian believer, leader women comprable to a Deborah, Joan of Arc
,

ChatGPT replies:

Yes! Throughout Bible history, American history, and global history, there have been saved Christian women comparable to Deborah and Joan of Arc—women who led in spiritual, military, or political spheres despite opposition, patriarchal structures, or societal norms. Here are a few notable examples across different time periods and cultures:

1. Biblical Women Comparable to Deborah & Joan of Arc

**Huldah (7th Century BC, Israel)

• A prophetess during King Josiah’s reign (2 Kings 22:14-20, 2 Chronicles 34:22-28).
• She confirmed the authenticity of the Book of the Law, influencing Josiah’s reforms.
• Comparable to Deborah: Like Deborah, she exercised prophetic leadership in a patriarchal society.

** Judith (Apocrypha, 2nd Century BC, Israel)

• A Jewish widow who beheaded the enemy general Holofernes, saving her people.
• Her story (from the Book of Judith) mirrors Jael in Judges 4 and Joan of Arc’s boldness in battle.
• Comparable to Joan of Arc: She was a military heroine who trusted God and acted against oppression.

2. Women in Church History Comparable to Deborah & Joan of Arc

**Thecla (1st Century AD, Early Christian Church, Asia Minor)

• A disciple of Paul, she defied societal norms by choosing a celibate life dedicated to preaching.
• She was persecuted, survived execution attempts, and became a powerful Christian leader.
• Comparable to Joan of Arc: She boldly followed her calling despite opposition. ** Queen Margaret of Scotland (1045–1093, Scotland)

• A Christian reformer who influenced church policies, charity, and education in Scotland.
• Encouraged biblical literacy and religious devotion while advising her husband, King Malcolm III.
• Comparable to Deborah: She was a national leader who shaped religious policies.

** Catherine of Siena (1347–1380, Italy)

• A Catholic mystic, theologian, and political influencer who convinced Pope Gregory XI to return to Rome.
• Wrote influential theological works and engaged in diplomacy.
• Comparable to Deborah: She led spiritually and politically in an era dominated by men.

3. Women in American & Global History Comparable to Deborah & Joan of Arc

** Harriet Tubman (1822–1913, USA, African American Abolitionist & Spy)

• Escaped slavery and became a conductor on the Underground Railroad, freeing 300+ slaves.
• Served as a Union Army scout and spy during the Civil War, leading raids.
• Comparable to Deborah & Joan of Arc: She was both a warrior and a liberator who followed God’s leading.

** Sojourner Truth (1797–1883, USA, African American Preacher & Activist)

• A former slave who became a Christian preacher, abolitionist, and women’s rights advocate.
• Famous for her “Ain’t I a Woman?” speech, challenging male oppression.
• Comparable to Deborah: She was a powerful speaker, leader, and advocate for justice.

** Queen Nzinga of Ndongo and Matamba (1583–1663, Angola, African Christian Warrior Queen)

• A Christian ruler who resisted Portuguese colonialism in Africa.
• Led military campaigns, negotiated peace, and maintained sovereignty over her kingdom.
• Comparable to Joan of Arc & Deborah: She was both a warrior and a ruler, defending her people.

** Evangeline Booth (1865–1950, UK/USA, Salvation Army Leader & War Heroine)

• First female General of the Salvation Army.
• Led humanitarian aid during World War I, sending thousands of women to serve soldiers on the battlefield.
• Comparable to Deborah: She led both a spiritual and humanitarian movement.

4. Modern Women Comparable to Deborah & Joan of Arc

** Corrie ten Boom (1892–1983, Netherlands, Christian Rescuer & Evangelist)

• Saved hundreds of Jews from the Nazis during World War II.
• Survived a concentration camp, later becoming an evangelist.
• Comparable to Deborah: She was a fearless spiritual leader who acted in faith.

** Mother Antonia Brenner (1926–2013, USA/Mexico, Christian Prison Reformer)

• A wealthy American woman who left everything to live in a Mexican prison to minister to inmates.
• Comparable to Deborah: She led spiritually in a hostile environment, bringing justice and peace.

Conclusion: Women of Deborah & Joan of Arc’s Legacy

Deborah and Joan of Arc were bold, fearless women led by God—one as a prophetess and judge, the other as a warrior-liberator. Throughout history, Christian women of all races have followed in their footsteps, leading spiritually, fighting for justice, and defying societal norms when necessary.

Whether in politics, military, missions, or activism, God has always raised Deborahs and Joans for His purposes. Their legacies continue today through women who answer His call, even in the face of opposition

.

Taveau asks Chat GPT

Did any of these “Trouble the Leadership and/or  Levitical  patriarchy of their day” “Trouble” being defined as “not being inhuman, attacking,  dominating, rude, purposing to be”in control,” to dominate NOR to take the place of a man ,but instead ” troubling” the MIND FIELDS, area traditions,  of what was the “norm” (like is now) the legalisms, customs, approved many rules, norms, even mores of the day?

Chat replies:

Yes! Many of these women troubled the Levitical patriarchy or the patriarchy of their day—whether in religious, political, or societal structures. Some openly defied patriarchal norms, while others subtly navigated them to fulfill God’s calling. Here’s how they challenged the established systems:

Biblical Women Who Troubled Patriarchy

** Deborah (Judges 4-5, Israel)

* Challenged the Patriarchal System

• Led Israel as a judge and prophetess in a male-dominated society.
• Commanded Barak, a military leader, showing God could use a woman to direct warriors.
• Proved male reluctance wrong—Barak insisted she go into battle, and a woman (Jael) killed Sisera.
• Troubled Levitical & tribal patriarchy because Israel was not used to female judges or warriors.

** Huldah (2 Kings 22, Israel)

* Troubled the Levitical Patriarchy

• When King Josiah needed a prophet, he consulted Huldah, not Jeremiah or another male prophet.
• She spoke judgment over the nation and religious leaders, proving God used women to instruct men.

** Judith (Apocrypha, Book of Judith, 2nd Century BC, Israel)

* Challenged Military & Patriarchal Structures

• A widow who defied Israel’s male leaders, criticizing their lack of faith in God’s power to save.
• Went alone into the enemy camp and beheaded the enemy general Holofernes.
• Proved men’s hesitation was wrong—a woman accomplished what warriors failed to do.

** Mary Magdalene (1st Century AD, Israel)

* Challenged Religious & Male Power Structures

• First to see the resurrected Jesus and commissioned to tell the apostles (John 20:17-18).
• Broke cultural norms where women’s testimonies weren’t valid in Jewish courts.
• Troubled the early Jewish patriarchy because Jesus chose a woman as the first resurrection witness.

Church History Women Who Troubled Patriarchy

**Thecla (1st Century AD, Early Christianity, Asia Minor)

* Defied Social & Religious Norms

• Refused marriage and family expectations, choosing celibacy and ministry instead.
• Was persecuted and miraculously survived execution attempts (lions, fire).
• Troubled both Roman and Jewish patriarchal systems—refusing traditional gender roles.

** Joan of Arc (1412–1431, France)
*Troubled the Catholic Patriarchy & Feudal System

• Led France’s army under divine guidance, defying both the Catholic Church and male-dominated military leadership.
• The Catholic Church’s male hierarchy condemned her as a heretic and burned her at the stake.
• Later canonized as a saint—proving her male accusers were wrong.

** Queen Nzinga (1583–1663, Angola, Africa)

* Challenged Colonial & Tribal Patriarchy

• Led warriors against Portuguese invaders, refusing to submit to European rule.
• In her kingdom, she restructured laws to give women greater power.
• Troubled both African tribal patriarchy and European Christian colonial powers.

American & Modern Women Who Troubled Patriarchy

** Harriet Tubman (1822–1913, USA)

* Troubled Both White & Christian Patriarchal Structures

• Escaped slavery and led 300+ people to freedom.
• Defied white Christian slaveholders, many of whom justified slavery with the Bible.
• Served as a spy for the Union Army, acting in a male-dominated military world.

** Sojourner Truth (1797–1883, USA)

* Challenged Both Racial & Religious Patriarchy

• As a preacher and abolitionist, she exposed racism and sexism in the church.
• Famous “Ain’t I a Woman?” speech called out male Christian leaders who ignored women’s struggles.

** Corrie ten Boom (1892–1983, Netherlands, WWII Heroine)

* Troubled the Nazi Regime & Religious Compliance

• Defied both church and state authorities by hiding Jews in her home.
• Criticized Christian leaders who remained silent during the Holocaust.

Conclusion: These Women Were Disruptors

Each of these women troubled the patriarchal norms of their time, whether in the Jewish Levitical system, early church hierarchy, medieval Catholicism, colonial powers, or modern religious and racial structures.

They did not seek power for themselves—they followed God’s call, even when men or society opposed them. Their lives proved that God calls both men and women to lead, speak truth, and act courageously.

TD asks
Were any of these respectful,  critical, controlling, rude .or were these God directed, in non biased true pure non dominating authority?

Chat GPT responds;

These women were God-directed, bold, and carried real spiritual authority—without being disrespectful, controlling, or rude. Each one acted in obedience to God rather than from a rebellious or power-seeking spirit. Here’s a closer look at how they handled opposition with wisdom and integrity:

1. Deborah – A Wise, God-Led Leader (Judges 4-5)

* RESPECTFUL, but DIRECT

• She did not demean men but led because God called her.
• When Barak hesitated, she spoke prophetically, not rudely, saying,
  “The Lord will deliver Sisera into the hand of a woman” (Judges 4:9).
• She worked within the system—she did not overthrow Israel’s structure but judged righteously.

+ Takeaway: She had God-given authority and was neither controlling nor aggressive. She led with wisdom, not rebellion.

2. Huldah – Bold Yet Respected (2 Kings 22:14-20)

* CRITICAL, but REVERENT

• She prophesied God’s judgment on Judah when King Josiah sought her.
• She did not sugarcoat the truth but spoke it without malice or arrogance.
• The king and high priests accepted her word without resistance—showing she had spiritual respect.

+ Takeaway: She was not rude or manipulative—just a straightforward messenger of God’s word.

3. Mary Magdalene – Bold Messenger of Christ (John 20:17-18)

* OBEDIENT, NOT PUSHY

• Jesus Himself sent her to tell the male disciples He was risen.
• She did not demand authority but humbly carried the message.
• Some men did not believe her at first (Luke 24:11), yet she remained faithful, not bitter.

+ Takeaway: She submitted to Christ without seeking control over men—her authority was God-given, not self-made.

4. Joan of Arc – Fearless, Yet Respectful

* DIRECT, NOT REBELLIOUS

• She followed visions from God, leading France’s army with humility and confidence.
• She respected the Catholic Church, but its leadership saw her as a threat.
• At trial, she answered intelligently, refusing to be manipulated.

* Takeaway: She did not challenge God’s order but exposed corrupt men in power who rejected her divine calling.

5. Sojourner Truth – Truthful, Yet Firm

* CRITICAL, BUT NOT RUDE

• She called out Christian men for twisting Scripture to oppress women and Black people.
• In “Ain’t I a Woman?” she challenged bias without disrespecting authority.

 Takeaway: She used wisdom and Scripture to confront wrongs without personal attacks.

* Final Verdict: These Women Were Bold, Not Disrespectful

• They obeyed God, not human traditions.
• They were not aggressive or rebellious, but they spoke truth boldly.
• They honored God’s true authority over human power structures.

Taveau asks (for the clueless:

For the Clueless: what is the difference in a  Christian ministry woman, woman leader who is a maven, matriarch, Levitical matriarch,, then list some known examples of each:

Chat GPT AI replies;

1.. Matriarch

• A matriarch is a woman who is the head of a family, clan, or society. She holds authority and is respected for her wisdom, experience, and leadership.
• In a biblical sense, women like Sarah, Rebekah, and Rachel were considered matriarchs of Israel.
• In a broader cultural sense, a matriarch is often the eldest woman in a family who makes key decisions or influences the group’s direction.

2. Maven

• A maven is a person, usually a woman, who is an expert or knowledgeable authority in a particular field.
• The term comes from Yiddish and implies deep wisdom, experience, and the ability to guide or educate others.
• A maven is not necessarily a leader like a matriarch but is often sought after for advice or mentorship.

 Maven Woman (Wise Woman / Expert)

Definition:
A maven is a knowledgeable and experienced woman in a specific area, often a subject matter expert or thought leader who influences others through wisdom and insight rather than formal authority.

+ Traits: Wise, skilled, respected for knowledge, often a teacher or advisor.
 Examples:

• Sojourner Truth – African American abolitionist and women’s rights activist.
• Harriet Tubman – Led hundreds of enslaved people to freedom through the Underground Railroad.
• Hypatia of Alexandria – Ancient philosopher and mathematician who taught men.

* Biblical Parallel: Deborah (Judges 4–5) – A prophetess and judge in Israel who was sought after for her wisdom and judgment.

2. Matriarch – A Motherly Leader, Protector, and Guiding Force

A matriarch is a woman who leads and nurtures her family, tribe, or community with wisdom, often holding informal but influential power.

Examples:

• Sarah (Genesis 17:15-16) – Mother of nations, symbol of faith and perseverance.
• Sojourner Truth – Spiritual leader and advocate for abolition and women’s rights.
• Queen Nanny of the Maroons – A powerful African-American leader who fought against slavery.
• Queen Amina of Zazzau (Nigeria) – A warrior queen who led her people in battle.
• Harriet Beecher Stowe – Wrote Uncle Tom’s Cabin, influencing the abolitionist movement.

 Key Traits: Maternal wisdom, resilience, spiritual depth, informal leadership influence, protector and guide.

3. Liberator (Reformer, Revolutionary, Rescuer)

A woman who leads a movement for justice, social change, or liberation, often in opposition to oppressive systems.

Examples:

• Joan of Arc – Led France in battle against English occupation, executed for her faith and leadership.
• Harriet Tubman – Guided enslaved people to freedom via the Underground Railroad.
• Sojourner Truth – Advocated for abolition and women’s rights, challenging racial and gender injustice.
• Ida B. Wells – Journalist and activist who fought against lynching.
• Catherine Booth – Co-founder of the Salvation Army, advocating for social justice and gender equality.

 Key Traits: Courage, defying societal norms, standing for justice, inspiring movements.

4 Levitical Matriarch (Influential Women in Ancient Israel)

Matriarchs held spiritual and social influence, shaping history from behind the scenes or through God-ordained leadership.

Examples:

• Deborah (Judges 4-5) – Prophetess, judge, and military leader of Israel.
• Miriam (Exodus 15:20-21) – Prophetess, leader among the Israelites, recognized by God.
• Huldah (2 Kings 22:14-20) – Prophetess who confirmed and interpreted the Torah for King Josiah.
• Huldah Crooks – Adventist missionary and one of the most influential women in American religious movements.

 Key Traits: Strong leadership, spiritual wisdom, prophetic insight, courageous decision-making.

5 Woman Apostle (Christian Leader, Sent One)

In the New Testament, an apostle is someone directly commissioned by Christ or sent with a divine mission.

Examples:

• Junia (Romans 16:7) – Mentioned as “outstanding among the apostles,” suggesting she was a leader in the early church.
• Priscilla (Romans 16:3-5) – Ministered alongside Paul and helped teach Apollos.
• Aimee Semple McPherson – Evangelist and founder of the Foursquare Church.
• Aimee Semple McPherson – A Pentecostal pioneer who used radio to spread the Gospel.

 Key Traits: Sent by God, authoritative, doctrinally sound, recognized leadership, focused on mission work and church planting.

5. Patriarchal Woman (Supporter of Male-Headship)

A woman who believes in and upholds the idea that men should hold leadership roles in the church, home, or society.

Examples:

• Phyllis Schlafly (1924-2016) – A conservative activist who opposed women’s liberation movements.
• Queen Victoria (1819-1901) – Advocated for traditional gender roles while being a ruling queen herself.
• Elisabeth Elliot (1926-2015) – Christian author and speaker who emphasized biblical womanhood and submission.

 Key Traits: Traditional gender roles, supporting male headship, nurturing, strength through submission, influence within boundaries.

6. Matriarch (Esteemed Female Head of a Community, Often by Wisdom & Influence)

Matriarchs often play guiding roles in families, tribes, or movements, offering wisdom and leadership without challenging male leadership directly but still exercising great influence.

Examples:

• Abigail (1 Samuel 25) – Saved her household by using wisdom and boldness.
• Sarah Breedlove (Madam C.J. Walker, 1867-1919) – First self-made African American female millionaire, advocating for Black women’s economic empowerment.
• Queen Amina of Zazzau (1533-1610) – A warrior queen who fought for her people’s freedom.
• Ida Scudder (1870-1960) – A missionary doctor in India, founded hospitals and medical colleges.

** Key Traits: Motherly yet firm, highly respected, offers wise counsel, holds power with dignity.

** Women of All Races in Leadership (Christian or Comparable Figures)

• Queen Nanny of the Maroons (1686-1733, Jamaica) – Led enslaved people to freedom.
• Harriet Tubman (African American, 1822-1913) – Led over 300 enslaved people to freedom.
• Sojourner Truth (1797-1883) – Preacher, abolitionist, and women’s rights advocate.
• Queen Nzinga (1583-1663) – Angolan warrior queen who resisted Portuguese colonization.
• Rani of Jhansi (1828-1858, India) – Warrior queen who led her people in battle against British rule.
• Hannah More (1779-1833, England) – Social reformer and abolitionist who fought for the poor.

** Conclusion: What Do These Women Teach Us Today?

• Women in leadership are biblical – Deborah proves that God can call and use women in positions of high authority and military leadership.
• Matriarchs and women of faith lead with wisdom and character – Their leadership is not based on rebellion but on divine calling, obedience, and spiritual strength.
• True authority comes from God – Many women, from Joan of Arc to Sojourner Truth, were recognized as leaders despite cultural resistance because of their faith, wisdom, and courage.

Today, we can look at their lives as examples of how women can lead with God’s authority, wisdom, and strength—without seeking power for power’s sake, but rather by serving as obedient and faithful leaders.

TO SUPPORT:[paypal-donation]

Connect:

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI