NOTE: Dr Taveau D’Arcy coined the word Levitical Patriarch and Levitical Matriarch, DFW 2010

Taveau asks Chat GPT AI:

If Jesus Christ would not be viewed as a “patriarch” or a “Levitical patriarch” in his ministry,  then please list any ” patriarchs” and “Levitical Patriarchs” during His work planting, First Church, global ministry early leader days ?

Chat replies:

In Jesus’ day, the terms “Patriarch” and “Levitical Patriarch” do not directly apply in the same way they did in the Old Testament. However, we can look at the religious and social structures of Jesus’ time to understand if such figures or roles existed, and how they may have influenced Jesus’ ministry.

1. Patriarchs:

• Biblical Definition of Patriarch: A patriarch, in the Old Testament, is typically the father or leader of a family or tribe, such as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The patriarchs were the heads of the major tribal families of Israel.

• In Jesus’ Day: While the title “patriarch” wasn’t commonly used in the same sense, Jewish society in Jesus’ time still respected the traditions of the patriarchs. The title may have been used in reference to the heads of Jewish families or prominent elders within the community. However, in the Jewish system of governance, it was the priests and scribes who held the official leadership roles.

• Jesus and Patriarchal Traditions: Jesus came into a society still very much steeped in patriarchal traditions, especially in terms of family structure and religious authority. Jewish men, particularly elders or those associated with religious leadership, had a patriarchal influence in their communities. However, Jesus didn’t adhere strictly to the patriarchal models of His time. He often challenged societal norms, including the role of men and women, and how authority was exercised. For example, His interactions with women (who were often marginalized) were revolutionary for the time (Luke 10:38-42, John 4:7-30).

2. Levitical Patriarchs:

• Levitical Priesthood: The term “Levitical Patriarch” is somewhat anachronistic in the New Testament context. In the Old Testament, the Levitical priesthood, descended from Levi (one of the twelve sons of Jacob), was the central priestly order that governed worship in the Tabernacle and later the Temple. The high priest, descended from Aaron (the brother of Moses), was considered the most prominent figure in this priestly class.

• In Jesus’ Day: In the time of Jesus, the Levitical priesthood was still in place, as the Temple in Jerusalem was the focal point of Jewish worship. The high priest and other priests who served in the Temple were considered religious authorities. These men were responsible for leading rituals, sacrifices, and ensuring the proper observance of Jewish law.

• Jesus and the Levitical Priesthood: Jesus, while He was born into a Jewish family from the tribe of Judah (not Levi), did not operate within the established Levitical priesthood. Instead, He referred to Himself as the Great High Priest (Hebrews 4:14-16, Hebrews 7:24-28), signifying that He fulfilled the role of priest but in a new and unique way that transcended the Old Covenant. Jesus’ priesthood was spiritual rather than a continuation of the Levitical system.

• Jesus’ Challenge to the Temple System: Jesus often confronted the abuses and the corruption within the priesthood. For example, He cleansed the Temple of money changers (Matthew 21:12-13, John 2:13-17) and criticized the Pharisees and scribes for their legalism and hypocrisy (Matthew 23:1-36). This was a direct challenge to the religious leaders who held patriarchal and Levitical authority.

3. Religious Authority in Jesus’ Time:

• While there wasn’t a direct concept of “patriarchs” or “Levitical patriarchs” in Jesus’ ministry, the Jewish religious system during that time was built upon patriarchal leadership through the Sanhedrin, Pharisees, Sadducees, and priests. Jesus’ ministry often conflicted with these established authorities, especially when their rules contradicted God’s heart of mercy and justice.

• The High Priesthood and the Sanhedrin: The High Priest in Jesus’ time was a key figure, both religiously and politically, and he was part of the Sanhedrin—the Jewish ruling council. The high priest at the time of Jesus was Caiaphas, who played a role in plotting Jesus’ death (John 18:13-14, 28-32). While not a “Levitical patriarch” in the strict sense, Caiaphas held significant authority over the religious life of the Jewish people.

• Jesus’ Authority: Jesus was seen as a teacher and healer, but His authority was questioned by these religious leaders because He did not conform to the Levitical priesthood’s expectations. He often spoke as one with direct authority from God, not needing to be validated by the Levitical or patriarchal structures in place (Mark 1:22, Matthew 7:29).

Conclusion:

In summary, while the patriarchal and Levitical structures existed in Jesus’ time, Jesus’ ministry was not defined by these systems. Instead, He introduced a new way of leadership and spiritual authority that challenged traditional patriarchal hierarchies. He was not a Levitical Patriarch or a traditional figure within the priesthood. Rather, He claimed a higher authority as the Son of God and the fulfillment of the Old Testament law, transcending the religious systems in place (Matthew 5:17).

Jesus’ challenge to these traditional roles is part of what led to His ultimate rejection by the religious leaders and His crucifixion. He came to establish a new spiritual Kingdom where authority was rooted in service, humility, and love, rather than the traditional Levitical or patriarchal systems.

Taveau asks
Which subculture of modern Christian sr ministry offices would be mostly likely to accuse Jesus and afflict Him  today?

Chat answers:

Traditionalist Denominations that Hold to a Patriarchal System

• Accusation and Rejection of Jesus: Some more patriarchal or conservative Christian traditions might accuse Jesus of undermining traditional gender roles and hierarchical structures, especially in His treatment of women and His teachings about leadership.
• Jesus’ message: Jesus was radically inclusive in His treatment of women (Luke 8:1-3, John 4:7-30). He did not conform to the rigid gender norms of His time, and He elevated women to positions of influence (e.g., the woman at the well, the women who supported Him in His ministry, and His interactions with Mary and Martha).
• Likely accusation: In more traditional patriarchal Christian settings, Jesus might be accused of threatening the structure of male authority in the church or society. His egalitarian approach to leadership and His defiance of the male-dominated structures of His time could be seen as revolutionary or destabilizing.

Nationalistic and Political Christian Movements

• Accusation and Rejection of Jesus: In today’s world, especially in some nationalistic or politically-minded Christian movements, where faith is closely tied to political ideologies, Jesus might be rejected for His lack of involvement in political structures and His focus on a spiritual kingdom rather than a physical, earthly kingdom.
• Jesus’ message: Jesus consistently taught that His kingdom was not of this world (John 18:36), and He refused to be used for political purposes, even when tempted to do so (Matthew 4:8-10). His focus was on reconciliation, peace, and loving one’s enemies, rather than securing political power.
• Likely accusation: Nationalistic movements that focus on “Christianizing” nations or using Christian principles to justify political actions might see Jesus as irrelevant or counterproductive to their goals. His refusal to align with political agendas could lead to accusations that He’s not taking the nation’s needs seriously or that He’s too apolitical.

Apostolic and Prophetic Movements with a Focus on Authority and Control

• Accusation and Rejection of Jesus: Some apostolic and prophetic movements, particularly those that place a heavy emphasis on personal submission to authority and the idea of “unquestionable leaders,” might reject Jesus for His direct challenges to established religious hierarchies and for His refusal to submit to religious leaders when He knew they were not teaching truth.
• Jesus’ message: Jesus often challenged the authority of the Pharisees, Sadducees, and even the Roman authorities, calling them out for their hypocrisy and false teachings (Matthew 23:1-36). He did not adhere to traditional submission when it came to religious manipulation or when His mission was being compromised (John 2:13-16).
• Likely accusation: In some circles that place a high value on submission to human leaders, Jesus’ model of servant leadership and His outright rejection of authoritative structures (except those that align with His mission) might be seen as disrespectful to those in positions of power. He would likely be accused of rebellion or insubordination to established “apostolic” authority.

Legalistic or Hyper-Conservative Religious Groups

• Accusation and Rejection of Jesus:Legalistic groups, or those with hyper-conservative theological stances (often seen in certain branches of the Fundamentalist and Reformed movements), who focus heavily on strict adherence to rules, may have issues with Jesus’ radical approach to grace and mercy.
• Jesus’ message: Jesus repeatedly challenged the legalistic interpretation of the Law and placed a higher value on love, mercy, and compassion (Matthew 12:1-14, Matthew 23:23-24). His attitude toward the outcasts (tax collectors, sinners, and Gentiles) was in direct opposition to the exclusivist mindset that some of these groups espouse.
• Likely accusation: In a context where adherence to doctrinal purity and moral codes is emphasized over compassion and grace, Jesus might be accused of breaking the law, not following religious customs, and associating with sinners. His more inclusive approach to the kingdom of God might be deemed too permissive or even heretical by hyper-legalistic groups.

Charismatic and Prophetic Movements with a Heavy Focus on Control

• Accusation and Rejection of Jesus: Some segments of the Charismatic and Prophetic movements, particularly those that emphasize authoritarian leadership, submission, and controlling prophetic words, might find Jesus’ rejection of authoritarianism troubling.
• Jesus’ message: Jesus often rejected earthly power and control (Mark 10:42-45), choosing instead a servant leadership model. He consistently challenged the religious leaders of His time, who had created rigid systems of authority (Matthew 23:1-12).
• Likely accusation: In movements where the prophetic office or apostolic authority is elevated to a level of unquestioned dominance, Jesus could be accused of undermining established leadership structures and authority. His egalitarian approach, where He elevated the marginalized and questioned the ruling elite, might be seen as subversive or disrespectful to those in power.

   The Prosperity Gospel movement/Word of Faith which teaches that material wealth, physical health, and success are indicators of God’s favor and are available to all believers through faith, might accuse Jesus based on His teachings about suffering, humility, and the rejection of earthly wealth.

• 

• TAVEAU DISCLAIMS THIS BLANKET TRIGGER USE OF “THE TRIGGERING WORD: “PROSPERITY GOSPEL” which is NOT ONLY Christian word of faith it is every where Global and not at all good, sound, safe or Jesus centered, Eternally saved *BUT I have a posting on this site about how a Christian can ‘have their names blotted out of THE LAMBS BOOK OF LIFE part 1 and 2 March 2025 An advertisement as it is too weird not to warn, and meaning from every person from any move, even myself) so place it here for all to examine

• NOTE: I AM NOT INTO ACCUSING BY NAME OR  GROUP STEREOTYPES

•  NOTE: But I understand that the term “Prosperity Gospel” has become a money-making tool for biased Christians—mostly younger, flame-throwing, cessationist types who love to scold and expose others. These opportunists are often involved in scandalous, tabloid-style media, where they create videos and content aimed at bashing major Christian figures for cash. It’s ironic, isn’t it? These individuals, who can afford quality video production, editing, and staff, are manufacturing sensationalized Christian rumors in an effort to gain attention. This “exposing” genre has taken on a TMZ-style approach to famous Christian ministries.

  While I won’t engage in that kind of behavior, I will share my perspective on Word of Faith and the often-reviled “Prosperity Gospel.” In my observation, the negative reaction to it is often a knee-jerk trigger response from those with a religious right bias, particularly from novice critics trying to break into the big leagues of money and fame.

  I choose not to go there and bash Bible-believing, true Word of Faith ministers, nor will I label them based on knee-jerk reactions. I have experience in this area and can break it down without accusing anyone, as many people like to do. Instead, I choose to honor and, where necessary, reprove and correct when I see that the local or regional balance is missing. ( I can see the Word of Faith being so intent on helping people get healed, provided form income, and family and saved that they omitted to train their follower on the governing basics (not all of course) but over many grass roots minister: who never got the Bible core  basics of love, respect for all, moral values (means too many much have met the lord by TV, then went into ministry in the local, took up collections, taught and said they were UNDER Famous Word of Faith  HOW CAN I SAY THAT..simple I watched it happen, around me where I use live and all over American and the WORLD.)

  POINT: I will not dispute that these movements have had serious issues and stirred up great controversy. However, I go way back, and I can speak to the many levels that have unfolded over the years (since the ’80s). I was “there” and witnessed what happened to it, including my own experiences and those of many others. While many stayed pure, many did not. I watched how the rise of big Christian TV strongly impacted the “uneducated” ministry grassroots. Other strong doctrines also passed through my area, including the deliverance ministry, Holy Spirit teachings, the Vineyard movement, and more.

  I was also there when TV media and news reports fanned the flames of Christians getting their 501(c)(3) status. I watched many ministers obtain them, but I also noticed the world starting to realize that even they could form a church (not necessarily saved) and raise money through their own 501(c)(3).

  I also observed the emergence of money-making doctrines, including Word of Faith, though not among those who pursued MLM (multilevel marketing), selling debit cards, vitamins, and such for ministry. I felt that this would be a conflict of interest for me, which is why I remain poor at present.

  So, you need to allow me to share my perspective on this “Word of Faith pulpit ministry bashing.” I am fully aware of what happens in the deep grassroots of TV media viewing and the ambition, treachery, and mercenary practices that are often accused of being part of the Prosperity Gospel. Yes, I want to clear that up once and for all. I call the good parts of it “Abiding Faith”—the core teaching principles—but I am not affiliated with them, nor do I support them. However, I would be glad to help them restore trust, as I am out here with their grassroots followers (not in Charlotte, but in DFW and beyond).

  I was also sent to intentionally study ministry doctrines and practices, as I was called in Sunday service in Central VA, long before all of this emerged, at the beginning of what was termed the “charismatic renewal.” I immersed myself in this group (and others) from the age of 24 onward.

• Also, over the years, I have also spent time in Fort Worth and Tulsa, each home to a different Word of Faith mega ministry. I can tell the difference between them. I am aware of how people have used the names of these famous top leaders to grow their ministry and make income, even forming a cult by falsely claiming affiliation with Kenneth Hagin. This is harmful and shows how bad actors can tarnish the reputation of the top founders, ultimately distorting their true gospel message.

  

  APOSTLE T’S MAIN MINSTRY  FAITH POINT: My view is that it is not a sin, a lie, or demanding any “sinister accusation” to need  income, provision, savings, or family fun, including things like college or vacations or things to preserve the quality of life, help others, and so forth. Making light of that is bigoted ,self righteous and SIN  for nobody but God knows another’s fullest heart and deepest innermost private business. I not know YOURS and YOU do not MINE and it is NONE of YOUR BUSINESS ANYHOW. But these ministry Accusers are just like the old timey Pharisees, white washed walls. Same with making the video versions.

   And yet, there is a significant difference between having your needs, even wants met  and making that your primary, sole ministry goal:”that what we each want to watch out for”

  ABIDING FAITH (my Cross Body Unity Version of this” Avoid Materialism Greed Envy Pride and be super careful with the RELATIONSHIP WITH MONEY and it’s effect on YOUR, YOUR OUTLOOK and ALL RELATIONSHIPS (more later on this0

  Word of Faith at the TOP vs at the Bottom Rank and File: frankly, I not walk in their shoes, know them or view their bookkeeping but I do regard as polite, simple, merry and careful (pressuring anyone for money) Again, I do not see that when I study at the top level, but I can see it, might  see it when I encounter people who  present themselves as “UNDER THEM”  affiliation with them. Having lived in the Fort Worth area from 2005-2020, I have a good understanding of how things operate.

  Going back to the 1980s in Virginia, I will say that what started as fun, friendly, non-accusatory, and non-judgmental—without labeling people as witches, Jezebels, or harlot,(means no scowling sober staring, divining mind reading) instead I loved their humorous, taking it easy “JESUS joy—and I note how the top ministers can be quite different at the professional top level than the more rugged way at bottom (350 or less person). Purpose for this disclaimer: I did have an incident in another state where the ‘person and his crowd”at the bottom level did not reflect the same character or quality. This is why I can verify that even a beloved movement can have “bad seeds” among its followers. These individuals often claim to be ordained or affiliated with the leaders, which can hurt the reputation of the leaders themselves. This happens in grassroots Word of Faith communities, particularly in states like Oklahoma and Texas, where they are not prone to bias against race, gender, income, politics, or appearance. I owe them respect, which I have.

  At the top level, there was a focus on servant leadership, not Levitical Patriarchism (LP) or occult practices. It was not about selfishly pursuing money. But I was not pleased with what I encountered at the grassroots level, which is why I pulled away. I am never just aligned with one kind of ministry doctrine; I am committed to Cross-Body Unity, drawing from as many as God leads.

  So, I encourage you to do the same( also with ME and EVERY BORN AGAIN MOVEMENT): “BYOB”—Bring Your Own Bible and be a Noble Berean who would make Paul proud.”

  A BIG RESOURCE:
  SEE LAMBS BOOK OF LIFE FOR TOUGH QUESTIONS ALONG THESE LINES.on this site

• .

  LONG LIFE PERSPECTIVE

• I honestly don’t think the top founders fully realize how many con artists are misusing their good teachings for wickedness, but I have witnessed the strong, wide-reaching effects, even globally. Should any top figures in the Word of Faith movement, who are not naysayers, want to engage, I offer my tender, kind, and compassionate heart, based on Isaiah 1:18, to dialogue and help devise a national focus to correct the grassroots.

  I will honor servant leader Kenneth Copeland, despite the messes and controversies, as he is the one the Lord used to reach me in my former state of Virginia. Through a low-watt AM Christian radio station in 1979, God used this minister to ignite something in my mind and spirit, which laid the foundation for me to be in full ministry all these years. I witnessed the joy, love, hope, and Holy Spirit quickening, which are still active in that worldwide movement. Therefore, I will not bash someone whom God has used so mightily, in such an informal but deeply significant way. I owe the Lord and this humble servant of God, who was led to purchase air time on that low-power station just for me.

  My Testimony of Kenneth Copeland and Word of Faith:

  At the start, when I was at my soul’s end, Kenneth Copeland’s timely word called me to think higher than my depressing, oppressive thoughts. God used him that day, and that word broke through the darkness and sorrow. I chose to be of good cheer and to study the Word ever since, which set me up for ministry. It was in the midst of a difficult time—the sudden death of my father, the passing of my dear grandmother, sleepless nights with a new baby, and severe postpartum depression—that I chose to live and overcome by knowing the Lord and renewing my mind in the Word. Through understanding faith and much of Kenneth Hagin’s early teachings, I feel no older now than when this journey began at age 28. That’s a miracle. I feel full of love, peace, joy, and vitality, with no fear.

  Later, I learned about Kenneth Hagin, understood his teachings on authority, perseverance, humility, and tailoring faith to one’s unique calling—all of which I embraced as part of my own “noble Berean” journey. I listen Kenneth H much more as he is core for certain foundational faith principals (not income but core faith for real life uncertain circumstances/walking on the verge ( which is my life)  and fear not, do not worrying,  ‘casting your cares, not to worry, healing, staying well and MORE

• So I owe a lot to this grass roots movement, but i am NOT UNDER THEM and do not support anyone due to the concerns, YET I live in victory and pure joy with and without money or wide fame or glory (and that is the SECRET TO CHRIST FOLLOWING “Godly contentment ” I Timothy 6:6 which I learned in them and more from abiding in the Holy Ghost and Word of God .

• From My Perspective (which I train as “Applied Faith”):

  Word of Faith is not just about money. For me, it’s about survival, joy, peace, forgiveness, power, quality of life, hope, and no fear—even in the toughest times. It’s not all about making money, so I refuse to curse anyone. Wise up.

  SO CEASE THE  NAME CALLING  ALL OF YOU PHILISTINES

Bottom Line “CONCLUSION” of this WAS JESUS A LP

If we judge by the fruit of modern Christian ministry offices, those subcultures most likely to accuse Jesus today would be ones that focus heavily on authoritarianism, materialism, and legalism—subcultures that value strict control, self-interest, and a rigid adherence to their own interpretations of scripture. These groups may find His focus on mercy, grace, inclusivity, and servanthood challenging to their systems, and as a result, might view Him as a threat, similar to how the religious leaders of His day did.

However, it’s important to note that Jesus came to challenge all human systems—whether religious, political, or social—and His message was ultimately about the kingdom of God, which transcends these earthly powers. Hence, His radical ministry would likely face resistance from various contemporary movements that prioritize human-made structures and ideologies over divine truth.

“Seek YE first the kingdom** of God and His righteousness

THEN all of these missing things will be added unto you“

**And what is the GOD’S KINGDOM  that HE advises you to SEEK” “His “secret invisible” KINGDOM is His righteous peace and joy in the Holy Ghost ” which is “FREE  OF CHARGE” and by GRACE GIVEN through simple childlike FAITH”

Yes and a Pastor’s AMEN!

TO SUPPORT: [paypal-donation]

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights  reserved under international copyright laws, inconjunction with AI