MINISTRY AI AND I
PART 2O TROUBLING THE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY PATRIARCHY
TRUE DEEP CONCERNS (Part 1)
“They also that erred in spirit shall come to understanding,
and they that murmured shall learn doctrine.”
Nation of Isaiah 29:24
(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws in conjunction with AI
PS Sister T asks: “As ever,if no shoe fits, then please, do not try to wear it!”
To the Body of Christ in Christian Ministry
I need to explain my own points of view. Also these views represent myself personally but also the multicultural leader movement EORR (explained beneath)CROSS BODY UNITY, (www.crossbodyunity.com)EORR and A.R.T. (Abiding in James 3:17 Relationship Theology) (www.abidingrelationshiptheology.org) is Dr. T’s God-called field. If anyone feels accused, convicted, or ashamed, understand that Taveau is PRO God’s Holy Relationship Theology and Good Word.
Note, please: Sister T is not about “far-off perceptive sin spying,” “reading your mind,” or “divining.” NO—she is upfront and approachable, dwelling in the continual fruit of James 3:17. Furthermore, she is NOT a “type,” nor is she a gender, age, or race-biased stereotype. She is a pure-hearted individual, whether single or married (and has been both).
Minister T is not a Wiccan psychic, prophet, false witness, backstabber, or one who uses “word curse theology.” No—she walks in reality, with pragmatic practicality—one eye on Eternity and the other on reality, always asking, How does what I do, say, write, or film affect another’s life? God’s Pure Witness Effect..yet in PURE REALITY.
Unlike the modern apostolic-prophetic-charismatic majority—visionary, senior prophet, teacher, founder -pastor, evangelist (Galatians 1:1-2)—the servant-apostle stands in the relationship unity verse of Isaiah 1:18: “Come, let us reason together. Though your sins be as scarlet, He will wash them white as snow.“ And Sister T means no matter who, what, when, where, or why.
However, that does not mean she will be used, manipulated, bullied, belittled, oppressed, dominated, or hoodwinked by anyone in the large, arrogant (mostly showbiz-affected, playtime-too-Demas) crowd. This is not personal. It represents EVERYBODY who understands this massive, mostly male divining subculture. And it is biblical under Paul’s words in 2 Timothy 3:16-17(see logo above)—to educate, inform, reprove, and correct, including subculture doctrines that impact Jesus Christ’s healthy, safe, fair, loving, and joyful Holy Name. He is non-partisan, non-biased, and so is she.
Taveau submits what follows —and throughout this series and in real life—as an exposé on false witness, evil eye, and dire learning curves (from the late 1980s onward). This should give Bible scholars deep, healthy fodder to help fellow Christians, parents, singles, ministers, and offices identify, correct, and winnow doctrine, while also complementing the many good qualities found within these groups.
Yet sadly, what remains is more Ishmael—untrustworthy, playboy playtime—than Isaac (laughter) and Jesus Christ, and never the (non-divining-safe Apostle Paul.
Again, let us “stir up whatever remains” in all of this, which is, candidly, a superior, mainly charismatic movement. To a new visitor or leader expat who is NOT an LP or an unaccompanied NON-WELP leader woman, it presents false supposed teaching, dry religion, much emotional dark intrigue, avoidance, and a superstitious, vacuous ministry subculture—until the majority choose to repent and teach Apostle Paul’s Ephesians model of “pure cross-body true community.”
Please note: The reason for this soft spoken person to use CHAT GPT AI **
(**which I interviewed see my AI USE POLICY ABOVE ON HOME PAGE)
The purpose of Pastor Taveau using ChatGPT in this (mainly men’s) series is that she knows the turf, the Bible, and the authority, and has the call to teach it without AI. However, due to the mixture, the repeated divining (mind reading), worse—cursing, posturing, and the false authority of some men—there is a need to address it. Many of these “types” operate with a “I Samuel Chief High Head Honcho big cheese” clueless, anti-certain (perceived as “gullible??”) approach, with misogyny directed at the newbie expat leader from leaders, elders, staff, ambitious laypersons, and their devout, cultish followers. These are WELP and WELM doctrines—very aggressive, dark, and filled with repeated demonic habits.
As a well-trained, experienced, and upfront leader, mature Bible teacher, abiding fully in the fruit of James 3:17, this certain “She” wants to address these issues according to the First Church and the Bible—but to do so maturely, objectively, and upfront. Asking ChatGPT AI ensures that it is not a “woman’s” opinion ,nor “my own.”
Start of Explanations and Many Ministry Concerns
(it is long and will continue Part 2 of this)
EORR Cross by the Unity Cross International Movement (Taveau D’Arcy)
The EORR Cross by the Unity Cross International Movement, under the leadership of Taveau D’Arcy, is a powerful example of a Christian movement that emphasizes equal opportunity, real respect, and unity across all people—regardless of gender, race, or social status. The movement’s mission to promote cross-blooded unity aligns with the broader Christian goal of reflecting God’s kingdom, where all are treated with dignity and equality.
At the core of the EORR movement is the belief that everyone is made in the image of God and therefore deserves respect and justice in all aspects of life, including church leadership, ministry roles, and community service. The movement stands against the misuse of power and authority, including any form of gender-based discrimination, racism, or abuse.
The Cross of Christ, (unifying as in Paul’s Ephesians 1:6/2:14-15/whole ch 4 hes/shes/all Jesus followers in transformed community; 5:21) ” which symbolizes the coming together of diverse groups under the banner of Christ, emphasizing humility, servant leadership, and the equal worth of all believers in the eyes of God. Under Taveau D’Arcy’s leadership, the movement seeks to train and equip Christian men and women to live out this principle through biblical teaching and practical action, creating spaces for all to serve and lead in ministry, without any form of patriarchal control or domination
By emphasizing cross-blooded unity, EORR Cross by the Unity Cross International Movement promotes a powerful biblical vision of justice, respect, and equality that breaks down barriers and fosters true reconciliation among all believers. This aligns with the values expressed by many movements and leaders in the egalitarian, global justice, and Pentecostal traditions who aim to serve without prejudice or discrimination, ensuring that all members—whether male, female, or of any race—have the opportunity to thrive and contribute fully in the work of the Kingdom.
In my Christian ministry, I teach the Word of God to born-again Christians of all races, styles, and backgrounds. Some come from more formal, patriarchal traditions, while others, like my own father—a great and stable minister—come from non-formal traditions.
When we communicate, we must be mindful of how we use vocabulary, ensuring that we do not engage in bias, name-calling, or stereotyping based on appearance, gender, race, age, expression, or perceived “vibe.” Within every group—whether racial, cultural, gender-based, or denominational—we will find both the very best examples of character and leadership and, if we look hard enough, some of the worst. But as followers of Christ, our calling is not to judge by outward appearances or assumptions (John 7:24) but to discern rightly, treating each person with the respect and dignity they deserve as God’s creation.
This training is essential to fostering unity in the body of Christ, ensuring that we do not allow unconscious bias, stereotypes, or cultural assumptions to influence how we perceive or treat others. Instead, we should strive for a Christlike approach—seeing people through the lens of love, truth, and individual relationship rather than through generalizations.
As a Christian minister, I want to be clear about the terms I use when addressing men and the different kinds of men that exist out there. Men are people, and I have always held great respect for men—whether as individuals, heads of households, or leaders in their communities—across all races and backgrounds. PS for those who “know this type” of human person: This She/Dr T/ Pastor Taveau/Miss T has never ever viewed any person, especially a “man” as “an object.”
I do not believe in Levitical patriarchism—that’s the issue. In my teaching, a man is good. A husband is good. A patriarch is good. A true patriarch, in the biblical sense, is like Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob—a stable, anchor-like figure within a family, tribe, ministry, or business. That kind of leadership is healthy and necessary.
However, problems arise when false authority, control, bad doctrine, or even subtle occult influence creep in. That’s where I take a stand and address it. There’s a big difference between true patriarchal leadership—which is rooted in wisdom, stability, and servant leadership—and false patriarchy, which distorts authority into domination, exclusion, or elitism.
In Christian ministry, there should be no place for patriarchy as a system. The idea of a “boys’ club,” where men alone hold all the power, or the “boys will be boys” mindset, is not biblical leadership—it’s cultural tradition mixed with control. This type of shepherding movement mentality, where women are treated as lesser, controlled, or excluded, is not of God. It’s man-made religion, not the true gospel.
God calls both men and women to leadership, ministry, and service. The real measure of a leader—whether a man or woman—is their humility, wisdom, and ability to serve others, not their gender or whether they fit into a man-made hierarchy. Jesus Himself never modeled an authoritarian, patriarchal system—He welcomed women, outcasts, and all who sought truth into His ministry.
The issue isn’t patriarchy itself, but how it is twisted into a controlling, exclusionary system that elevates some while oppressing others. That’s where the problem lies, and that’s why I address and confront it in ministry.
My ministry EORR Ephesians 5:21 (“mutually submitted to all”) in First Church Pauline apostolic also Ephesians 4 “belief in the common doctrine” polite fashion, widely recognizes and honors the role of men, husbands, and patriarchs in a biblical and balanced way—affirming their God-given roles in the family, ministry, and society while rejecting authoritarian distortions of male leadership.
A patriarch, as seen in Scripture, represents stability, provision, and responsible leadership. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were not merely heads of their households but also spiritual leaders, guiding their families in faith and covenant with God. Their authority was based on responsibility, relationship, and obedience to God rather than dominance or control. This form of patriarchy—rooted in love, wisdom, and servant leadership—is good. It builds families, ministries, and communities with integrity.
However, Levitical patriarchism, as you distinguish it, is a distortion. It shifts from biblical leadership to hierarchical dominance, enforcing rigid gender roles that exclude women and limit the full expression of God’s calling on individuals. This is where false authority comes in—when leadership moves from servant-hearted responsibility to coercive control, intimidation, and exclusivity.
Taveau Continues to Voice Assessed Problems with The LP Patriarchy in Christian Ministry
While men are called to be strong leaders in their homes and communities, Christian ministry itself is not meant to be patriarchal in the exclusive, authoritarian sense. The church is a body of believers, not a “boys’ club.” Jesus Himself never modeled a men-only leadership structure. He discipled both men and women, elevated their roles (e.g., Mary sitting at His feet as a disciple in Luke 10:39), and sent the first resurrection witness (Mary Magdalene) to proclaim the gospel to the disciples.
When Christian ministry becomes patriarchal in the wrong sense, it fosters:
- The Boys’ Club Mentality – Leadership is reserved for men only, often to the exclusion of women with legitimate callings.
- Shepherding Movements – Systems of rigid control, where authority figures dictate personal decisions under the guise of “spiritual covering.”
- False Teaching – Doctrines that place men as superior to women rather than co-laborers in Christ (Galatians 3:28).
- Occult-like Control – When manipulation, intimidation, or hidden spiritual abuse replaces true pastoral care.
True Leadership: Servanthood, Not Control
Jesus taught servant leadership (Matthew 20:25-28). Paul instructed men to love their wives as Christ loved the church (Ephesians 5:25)—which means sacrificially, not dictatorially. The New Testament emphasizes gifts and callings given to all believers (Acts 2:17-18), not just to men.
A healthy Christian ministry recognizes the value of both men and women, allowing them to function according to God’s calling rather than man-made restrictions. It upholds strong, godly men while rejecting authoritarian patriarchy, false control, and exclusionary leadership.
Apostolic Sr Pastor asks Chat GPT AI
Please give more Biblical examples:
Chat GPT said
Biblical Patriarchy vs. False Patriarchy in Christian Ministry
1. The Good: Biblical Patriarchy as Stability and Leadership
A biblical patriarch, in the true sense, is a responsible, wise, and stable leader—whether in a family, a ministry, or a business. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were not only family heads but spiritual guides, leading their households in faith. Their leadership was:
- Relational, not dictatorial
- Based on responsibility, not dominance
- Centered on faith in God, not personal power
A godly husband, father, or male leader is a blessing when he leads through wisdom, strength, and humility. A real patriarch provides stability for his family and community, not through force but through faithfulness.
2. The Issue: Levitical Patriarchism & False Authority
While men in leadership are good and necessary, a patriarchal system in Christian ministry is not biblical. This is where the problem arises—when the concept of male leadership is distorted into an exclusive, authoritarian system that enforces gender-based hierarchy not taught by Jesus or the apostles.
False Patriarchy in Ministry Leads to:
- “The Boys’ Club” Mentality – Only men are allowed in decision-making and leadership, creating exclusion and bias.
- Shepherding Movement-Style Control – People (especially women) are expected to “submit” to male authority without biblical balance.
- False Teaching – Ideas that restrict the calling and function of women, despite clear biblical evidence that God calls and equips both men and women (Judges 4:4, Acts 2:17-18, Romans 16:1-7).
- Occult-like Authority – When leaders use fear, intimidation, or “divine revelation” to control rather than to serve.
This false authority is the kind of “patriarchy” that should not exist in Christian ministry. It is not the leadership of Abraham, Moses, or Paul—it is hierarchical dominance, exclusion, and control disguised as biblical order.
3. Jesus’ Model: Servant Leadership Over Hierarchy
Jesus did not create an exclusive male hierarchy in His ministry. Instead:
- He discipled both men and women (Luke 10:38-42).
- He entrusted the first resurrection message to a woman (John 20:17).
- He condemned authoritarian religious leadership (Matthew 23:8-12).
Paul reinforced this, stating that in Christ, there is neither male nor female (Galatians 3:28). He worked alongside both men and women in ministry (Romans 16).
4. True Leadership: Stability Without Control
Christian ministry should reflect Christ, not human hierarchy. A true leader—whether male or female—leads by serving (Matthew 20:25-28).
- A real patriarch leads his family and community with love and wisdom.
- A real apostle, prophet, pastor, or leader builds up others, not controls them.
- A real Christian ministry is led by those called by God, not just by gender-based rules.
Final Thought: Upholding Men Without Enforcing Patriarchy
You honor and respect men as heads of households, business leaders, and ministers—but not as the exclusive gatekeepers of Christian leadership. A godly man is a blessing. A false patriarchal system is a distortion.
Next: Taveau states a big Cross Body Unity also her personal Teaching Perspective
The tradition of patriarchy in Christian ministry often seems big boss-controlled, shaped by leadership style rather than true biblical principles. Some of these leaders may respect their mothers, wives, and the women around them—or they may not. The key is discernment, not blanket stereotypes.
When looking at hierarchical structures, leadership dynamics vary. In ministries with many people, leaders with a formal, even fierce disposition—whether intentionally or not—may lean toward control systems that rely on hierarchy and authority rather than relationship and trust. This is where leadership can drift into a rigid, authoritarian model rather than the servant-hearted, relational approach Jesus modeled.
Jesus Christ was not authoritarian or totalitarian. He did not govern through force, coercion, or rigid hierarchy but through relationship, persuasion, and example. He influenced hearts, not just behaviors. His leadership was firm yet compassionate, direct yet understanding. He led by serving and built a kingdom culture, not a corporate structure.
When leaders over-rely on hierarchy to maintain control, they risk creating a system that values power over people. True biblical leadership requires wisdom, discernment, and the ability to connect with others rather than simply enforcing a chain of command. The challenge is to lead with strength while also embodying Christ’s heart for people.
Apostle Taveau tells Chat GPT
The tradition of patriarchy in Christian ministry often appears to be controlled by a “big boss” leadership style. Some may respect their mothers, wives, and women in general, while others may not. The goal is to apply discernment rather than blanket stereotypes. In hierarchical structures, leaders with a formal or even stern disposition may lean toward relying on hierarchy and control systems. However, Jesus Christ led through relationship and persuasion rather than authoritarian or totalitarian methods. Please expand on all of this
Chat GPT AI replies
Christian Ministry: Patriarchy, Hierarchy, and Jesus’ Leadership Model
In many Christian ministry traditions, patriarchy is not just about male leadership—it is about leadership style. Some patriarchal leaders respect and honor women (mothers, wives, and female leaders), while others do not. This is where discernment becomes essential—rather than making blanket stereotypes, we must evaluate leadership styles on a case-by-case basis.
1. Why Patriarchal Ministries Tend Toward Big Boss Leadership
In larger ministries or those with a more formal, structured style, leaders may rely on hierarchy and control systems to maintain order. The issue isn’t always that they are men, but that their leadership style becomes fierce, authoritative, and, at times, even harsh. This happens because:
- Hierarchy is easier to manage than relational leadership.
- Formal structures favor top-down authority rather than shared leadership.
- Some leaders fear loss of control and rely on strict rules instead of trust.
While order and structure are necessary in large ministries, authoritarian control is not Christlike. A fierce or formal leader may lean toward rule enforcement rather than relationship-building, which shifts the focus from serving God’s people to protecting the system itself.
2. Jesus’ Leadership: Relational, Not Authoritarian
Jesus operated completely differently from human hierarchies. Rather than leading with fear, strict control, or enforced submission, He led through:
- Persuasion and invitation – He called disciples; He never forced them (Matthew 4:19).
- Personal relationship – He knew His followers by name and engaged with their lives (John 10:3).
- Servant leadership – He washed His disciples’ feet instead of demanding they serve Him (John 13:12-15).
- Empowerment, not suppression – He sent out His followers with authority, including both men and women (Luke 10:1-3, Acts 2:17-18).
While Jesus respected structure, He did not create a rigid hierarchy. He did not install a top-down control system but a family-like model where leadership was about serving, guiding, and teaching—never dominating.
3. The Danger of Hierarchy-Based Control in Ministry
When Christian ministries become too dependent on hierarchy, they risk turning into big boss systems, where authority becomes the ultimate goal rather than spiritual growth. This often leads to:
- Rigid chain of command – Leaders rule through fear rather than respect.
- Suppression of voices – Those who challenge or question are seen as rebellious.
- Gender-based restrictions – Women, and sometimes younger men, are given limited roles.
- Legalism over grace – Rules become more important than relationship with Christ.
This isn’t biblical leadership—it’s institutional control. When fear of losing authority overrides the mission of Christ, a ministry stops being relational and Spirit-led and starts functioning like a religious corporation.
4. Moving Toward Discernment: Evaluating Leadership Styles
Not all patriarchal leaders are authoritarian. Some are wise, stable, and relational. The key is discernment:
- Is the leader relational or controlling?
- Is leadership based on serving or ruling?
- Is the structure there to support people or to maintain power?
A healthy leader—whether male or female—leads like Christ:
- With humility, not ego
- With persuasion, not force
- With empowerment, not suppression
Final Thought: True Leadership Balances Authority and Relationship
Hierarchy can be useful for organization, but it should never replace relationship, discernment, and Spirit-led leadership. Christian ministry should not be modeled after the world’s corporate or authoritarian systems, but after Christ’s example of servant-hearted, relational leadership.
Dr Taveau says to Chat GPT
Please expand this further
Chat GPT replies
Christian Ministry Leadership: The Balance Between Authority and Relationship
In Christian ministry, the tradition of patriarchy has often shaped leadership styles. While not all patriarchal leadership is bad, some ministries lean toward control rather than Christlike guidance. The issue is not simply male leadership, but a dependence on hierarchical systems that can sometimes replace relationship, discernment, and true spiritual authority.
1. When Hierarchy Becomes Control
Leadership in larger, more formal ministries often relies on hierarchy to maintain order. However, hierarchy itself is not the problem—it’s when hierarchy becomes a tool for control, exclusion, and dominance that it moves away from Jesus’ model.
The Risk of a “Big Boss” Leadership Style
- Top-Down Command: Power is concentrated in a few individuals who make all decisions.
- Fear-Based Compliance: People follow out of obligation, not conviction.
- Suppression of Others’ Gifts: Those outside the power structure (including women, younger leaders, and non-traditional ministers) are overlooked.
- Legalism Over Relationship: Rules and rank become more important than discernment and spiritual maturity.
When leaders prioritize structure over servanthood, ministries shift into institutional control rather than a Spirit-led community.
2. Jesus’ Leadership: Relational, Not Authoritarian
Jesus respected order but did not create a rigid hierarchy. Instead of leading as a law-enforcing authority figure, He led as a servant, teacher, and mentor.
Key Traits of Jesus’ Leadership:
- Invitation, Not Demand – He said, “Follow me” (Matthew 4:19) but never forced people.
- Empowerment, Not Suppression – He sent out His disciples to minister on their own (Luke 10:1-3).
- Mutual Honor, Not One-Sided Authority – He respected women in ministry (John 20:17) and worked alongside both men and women (Luke 8:1-3).
- Correction With Love, Not Control – He confronted errors but did not use fear tactics (Matthew 23:8-12).
Jesus did not reject leadership, but He modeled a leadership style that was relational, Spirit-led, and rooted in love rather than rigid hierarchy.
3. The Modern Ministry Struggle: Hierarchy vs. Relationship
Many ministries default to hierarchy for efficiency, but at what cost?
- In smaller ministries, relationship is often prioritized, but growth can challenge this.
- In large or formal ministries, structure is necessary, but it can lead to an authoritarian mindset if unchecked.
Questions for Discernment:
- Does this ministry rely more on rules than on the Holy Spirit?
- Are people valued for their relationship with Christ or their position in a system?
- Is authority used to serve others or to control them?
- Is correction done in love, or is it used to enforce submission?
These questions help distinguish healthy, relational leadership from rigid, hierarchy-based control.
4. The Biblical Model: Authority as Service
Paul, one of the greatest apostles, functioned within order but emphasized relationship and servanthood over hierarchy.
- He recognized leaders but did not create a rigid system (Ephesians 4:11-12).
- He called for mutual submission, not top-down control (Ephesians 5:21).
- He worked alongside men and women in leadership roles (Romans 16:1-7).
The early church was structured, but it was not a closed-off power system—it was a Spirit-led, relational community.
5. Moving Forward: Leadership That Balances Authority and Relationship
Ministries should strive for a balance between order and Christlike relationship:
- Recognizing leadership roles but not making them about dominance
- Allowing structure but staying flexible to the Holy Spirit
- Encouraging both men and women to serve based on calling, not tradition
- Leading with humility, not entitlement
Final Thought: Rethinking Ministry Leadership for Today
A big boss system focuses on who has power.
A Christlike ministry focuses on who is serving.
ChatGPT responds:
Witch-Watching and False Authority in the Modern Church
Your observations align with a serious issue in many ministry movements today—the misuse of discernment to judge, label, and exclude people without relationship, conversation, or biblical due process.
1. The Shift from Relationship to Spectral Judgment
When discernment becomes suspicion, and suspicion turns into a system of labeling people as witches, Jezebels, or rebels—without evidence, without interaction, without biblical Matthew 18-style correction—this shifts into false authority, spiritual abuse, and even cult-like control.
The Fruit of True vs. False Discernment
- True discernment leads to prayer, personal relationship, and seeking the Holy Spirit’s guidance in humility.
- False discernment is based on fear, gossip, bias, and assumption—leading to exclusion and control.
Many patriarchal or hierarchical movements have developed a witch-watching culture, where leaders feel entitled to judge and condemn without scriptural due process.
2. Biblical Warnings Against Witch-Watching and Spectral Evidence
Throughout history, the concept of “spectral evidence”—judging someone based on perceived unseen qualities—has been used to justify false accusations.
Biblical Examples:
- The Pharisees falsely accused Jesus of being possessed (Matthew 12:24) because He didn’t fit their mold.
- Paul warned against turning ministry into arguments and divisions (1 Timothy 6:4-5).
- Jesus modeled confrontation through direct engagement, not assumptions (Matthew 18:15-16).
This witch-watching behavior has no biblical support—in fact, it mirrors occult practices of divination rather than Christian discernment.
3. The Danger of False Accusations and Character Assassination
Many seemingly “prophetic” ministries today are engaged in what is essentially character assassination, using their discernment to judge people by appearance, energy, or unspoken impressions—without ever meeting or speaking with them.
Signs of False Prophetic Accusation Culture:
- No direct conversation or relationship with the accused.
- Judgment based on stereotypes (race, gender, demeanor, style).
- Secrecy and no accountability in decision-making.
- Demonizing people rather than following biblical correction steps.
- Power structures that demand submission without question.
4. The Connection to Levitical Patriarchism and Control
In patriarchal ministry movements, this witch-watching system becomes a control tool to silence opposition:
- Strong women get labeled as “Jezebels.”
- Non-conforming men get labeled as “rebellious.”
- Anyone outside their system is seen as “dangerous” or “uncovered.”
This is not biblical authority—this is fear-based authoritarianism. True biblical authority is based on servanthood, respect, and actual relationship.
5. Moving Toward a Christlike, Relationship-Based Discernment
Instead of spectral discernment, suspicion, and name-calling, the church needs real, biblical discernment based on:
- Knowing people personally before forming opinions.
- Correcting with love, not labeling with suspicion.
- Avoiding fear-based witch-hunts.
- Following biblical accountability rather than creating inner circles of control.
Final Thought: Reclaiming Discernment from Fear and Control
The real enemy of the church is not people, but false teaching, false control, and a lack of real relationship. Christ modeled engagement, not avoidance—He met with sinners, corrected them, and invited them into truth.
Dr T asks Chat GPT
Please give Bible examples similar to, exactly like “perceiver seer accusing, possibly “divining Apostle Taveau’s coined term “mega, micro (unjust) witch watching”
Chat GPT states:
Biblical Examples of False Accusations and Witch-Watching
Throughout the Bible, we see examples of false accusations, misuse of authority, and judgment based on suspicion rather than truth. These examples illustrate the dangers of witch-watching, spectral discernment, and religious control.
1. The Pharisees Accusing Jesus of Using Demonic Power (Matthew 12:22-24)
False Accusation:Jesus was called a witch/sorcerer.
Context: Jesus healed a demon-possessed man, and instead of recognizing God’s power, the Pharisees accused Him of casting out demons by Beelzebub (Satan).
Jesus’ Response (Matthew 12:25-28):
- He pointed out their flawed logic—why would Satan cast out Satan?
- He explained that true spiritual authority comes from God, not accusations.
- He warned them against blaspheming the Holy Spirit by falsely accusing God’s work.
Lesson: False religious leaders often accuse what they don’t understand, especially when it threatens their control. Today’s witch-watchers do the same—labeling people as witches, rebels, or Jezebels without evidence, just as the Pharisees did to Jesus
2. The False Accusation Against Naboth (1 Kings 21:1-16)
False Accusation:Jezebel orchestrated Naboth’s death using false witnesses.
Context: King Ahab wanted Naboth’s vineyard, but Naboth refused to sell it. Queen Jezebel set up false witnesses to accuse Naboth of blasphemy, leading to his execution.
The Key Manipulation Tactics Used:
- False witnesses were raised to accuse Naboth of something he didn’t do.
- No real trial, just quick condemnation.
- The accusation was religious (blasphemy), but the motive was personal gain.
Lesson: Many false accusations today cloak themselves in religious justification but are really about control, power, or silencing people.
3. Job’s Friends Wrongly Discerned His Suffering (Job 4-5, 8, 22)
False Accusation:Job must have sinned to deserve his suffering.
Context: Job suffered immense loss, and instead of comforting him, his friends accused him of hidden sin. They used false discernment—assuming suffering was always a punishment from God.
God’s Response (Job 42:7):
- God rebuked Job’s friends for falsely speaking on His behalf.
- Job was actually righteous, but his friends judged him based on assumption, not revelation.
Lesson: Many in charismatic movements wrongly use prophetic gifts like Job’s friends—judging based on assumptions, vibes, or appearances rather than truth.
4. Paul Was Accused of Being a “Plague” and a Troublemaker (Acts 24:5-9)
False Accusation:Paul was a threat to religious order.
Context: Jewish leaders accused Paul of being a “plague,” “troublemaker,” and leader of a dangerous sect before the Roman governor.
Key Aspects of the False Accusation:
- He was labeled based on association (Christianity as a whole).
- The accusers never spoke with Paul personally to hear his side.
- Their real motive was control, not truth.
Lesson: Today, when ministers and believers are accused of being rebellious, uncovered, or Jezebels, it often follows the same pattern—no relationship, just judgment from a distance.
5. The Salem Witch Trials Parallel: Spectral Evidence
Though not biblical, the Salem witch trials provide a real-world example of how false spiritual discernment leads to destruction:
- People were accused of witchcraft based on dreams, visions, and feelings.
- No one investigated actual behavior, only perceptions.
- The accused had no chance to defend themselves.
- Many innocent people were executed based on hysteria.
The modern church’s “witch lists” operate the same way—labeling people based on subjective feelings rather than actual sin or biblical standards.
Final Thought: Jesus’ Model of Discernment
Instead of assuming and labeling, Jesus always:
- Engaged directly with people before making judgments (John 8:1-11, Matthew 18:15-16).
- Discerned through relationship, not speculation.
- Rejected religious control and rebuked the Pharisees for their false accusations.
True discernment leads to clarity and restoration. False discernment leads to suspicion, labeling, and destruction.
TO BE CONTINUED
In next part of this, Part 2 Taveau Voices Her Deep Concerns about ‘the realism, fruits, relationships, speaking, in primarily “no holy hear of the Lord, mostly accusing, gossip, false witness and prior movements loosing their GREATNESS due to false doctrine, systems, false teaching, false Bible priorities, occult
NOT ALL BUT..too many in the Grass Roots Ambitious Materialistic Busy Ministry save themselves, time by “divining, controlling, Big Boy kind of Fruit”
Discuss SHEPHERDING, COVERING, MORE
TO SUPPORT: [paypal-donation]
To respectfully, maturely contact:
(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI
Discover more from The Ministry AI + I
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
