PART 3 “TROUBLING THE CHRISTIAN PATRIARCHY” THE CHRISTIAN LEADER WOMEN

MINISTRY AI AND I
PART 3 CHRISTIAN WOMEN

SUBMISSION, SUSPICION, DIVISIVE SPECULATION

Worst Type of Office Ministry  Doctrinal Subculture

LP I Samuel Eli and Sons:

“They’d never once met before a real woman leader,

who was NOT  their

Property, their  (witchy Jezebel) Devil or their Cutesy Concubine’

But Then Enters a Pure Living, Grieving Hannah on the Big Boss Temple Steps.

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved under international copyrights laws, in conjunction with AI

A Relationship Big Real Deal
 I submit this all as well thought out Selah in a apostle Paul command “work out your salvation with fear and trembling” (micro, mega, unique individual) Philippians 2:12

ALSO: This Part 3  is not about, neither is if for ME: it  is for YOURSELF and all of those OUT THERE. Pastor, Miss T is NOT “Back Under the Old Testament Levitical Law.’ And this SHE will surely DO what SHE has got to DO..at the Lord divine leading (Office Deborah Slo Mo Lane Type)

Therefore it is up to you to do your own Bible research, for the Law “accusing” and am NOT going fighting, debate or ego vilify, to prove anything.  I will not debate. It’s also  a poor public witness.

Also, this Miss, Sister, Dr, Apostle, Sr Pastor T is a founder leader of a diverse ministry Cross Body New Move. Hence is not into  “fighting over Law and Christian opposing ministers.  If you are senior office true pastor, authority or have my phone number, then call to make an official appointment that reflects, hero models “James 3:17, Isaiah 1:18, and mature non controlling mega, micro Ephesians 5:21; 3:19;

FYI : See my bio and backstory about all of this in PART 1

SHRILL KNEE JERK PERSONS, MINISTRY BIBLE THUMPERS:

IF YOU want to be WHAT pro or can “Christian  women” that is YOUR CHOICE, for I am not bothered by it. I will do as God says and so should YOU.

SISTER TAVEAU’S LIFE POLICY IF ONE SHOULD WANT TO DISAGREE:

The Bible is very complex, encompassing the Law, Christian freedom, license, compromise, and sometimes even Bible-thumping, nasty accusations, and name-calling. I am well-versed in biblical authority regarding both males and females, the Law, Jesus’ ministry, and His relationships with family and friends in His EORR (Equal Opportunity Real Respect) ministry. I understand the nuances of submission and am not driven by a need to “win” or get my way. However, many people are, and I refuse to argue, defend myself, or name any famous figures or ministries in my videos or media. If others do so, I stand as the complete opposite. I teach Apostle Paul’s instruction to “work out your own salvation with fear and trembling” (Philippians 2:12), always demonstrating equal opportunity and real respect for all.

As senior office apostle, pastor, prophet,teacher,administrator, witnessing evangelist, I may contacted and  be respectfully addressed in private, by appointment. I am going there a debate (I have that policy at the top of each site.

I duly acknowledge there is “no” etched in doctrine concrete formula for all of this. Hence, that is WHY I use AI to be objective “historically” not to ‘give a word from the Lord’ that would be my Call

I hereby acknowledge:
The Bible is very complex,
encompassing the Law, Christian freedom, license, compromise, and sometimes even Bible-thumping, nasty accusations, and name-calling.

Also, I am well-versed in biblical authority regarding both males and females, the Law, Jesus’ ministry, and His relationships with family and friends in His EORR (Equal Opportunity Real Respect) ministry.

As office Galatians 1;1-2/Acts 17:17 who is ‘submitted to all in Ephesians 5:21, I historically understand and value, the nuances of “peaceful submission” but I  am not driven by a need to “win” or to get my way.

However, many people are, but I refuse to argue, defend myself, or name any famous figures or ministries in my videos or media. If others do so, I stand as the complete opposite. I teach Apostle Paul’s instruction to “work out your own salvation with fear and trembling” (Philippians 2:12), always demonstrating equal opportunity and real respect for all. respectfully addressed locally in the Charlotte area or spoken to gently and respectfully online or in person. I abide by “the pure-hearted right to disagree” and follow Apostle Paul’s teachings, as well as these key scriptures:

  • Galatians 6:1 – “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.”

  • Matthew 18:15 – “Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.”

  • Ephesians 5:21 – “Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”

  • Ephesians 2:14-15 – “For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace.”

  • Isaiah 1:18 – “Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.”

  • Ephesians 4:1-4 – “I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love; Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling.”

I also abide in the enduring, peaceful fruit of James:

  • James 3:17-18 – “But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.”

Sister Taveau Asks Chat GPT AI:

Please discuss all First Church, apostles “Headship Doctrines”  Male Authority, and  Did They (headship, covering doctrines) exist in the First Church?

Chat GPT AI answers:

In the First Church, there was no centralized doctrine that mandated strict “headship” roles (male-only leadership, covering doctrines, or female submission under men) like some modern movements practice.

Taveau States:

Across the USA wide, in too many deep grass roots spirit filled regions,  these doctrines are a law unto themselves. “totalitarian” and not “Ephesians 5:21 “(which we described in depth PART 2 of this ministry series..

And (such as those seen in modern ministry movements, such Taveau’s definition of “Levitical Patriarchism, L Matriarchism, which has a cult vibe. This LP has also being regarding in the   Shepherding Movements, such “certain media styles of” celebrity, “apostles in the gates of the city, mostly CI/Christian International,NAR other LP patriarchal old time moves, like pentecostal, certain forms Assembly of God, even more than a few Word of Faith, but not the top most levels (or so repeatedly appears)) But we are not against them, just know they’re” off” and dysfunctional (defeating Jesus healthy accepting, servant leader, eternal purposes) in specific doctrines of authority, men and women, and the like.

We cry out for those who are allowing false  accuser prone country law, seeming traditional leader doctrines  (however not all) to repent, retrain and to get  your houses in order, I will be working on this one, also.


Chat GPT AI resumes:

It appears to have evolved much later, often shaped by cultural influences rather than original biblical teachings.

Let’s break down the historical and biblical evidence to see what was taught in the First Church compared to modern practices.

1. First Church Leadership Structure: No Exclusive Male-Only Leadership

  • Jesus’ Ministry:

    • Jesus demonstrated radical inclusion of women in leadership roles:
      • Mary Magdalene was the first to witness and proclaim His resurrection (John 20:17-18).
      • Mary of Bethany sat at His feet like a disciple (Luke 10:39).
    • Jesus did not teach “male-only” headship; instead, He emphasized servant leadership (Matthew 20:25-28).
  • Paul’s Ministry:
    Paul affirmed women’s roles in leadership and ministry:

    • Phoebe was a deacon (Romans 16:1-2) and carried Paul’s letter to the Romans.
    • Priscilla taught Apollos, a prominent leader (Acts 18:26).
    • Junia was called an apostle (Romans 16:7), which indicates high authority in the church.
    • Galatians 3:28 (KJV): “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”

These passages show that the First Church promoted equality under Christ, with women actively involved in leadership and ministry.

2. Headship Doctrines in the First Church: What Did the Bible Say?

The modern “headship” doctrine that asserts male control over women is primarily based on misinterpretations of Paul’s writings. Let’s examine these scriptures closely.

A. Ephesians 5:22-24 (Often Used for Male Headship)

  • KJV: “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church…”

Cultural Context:

  • Paul wrote this in a Greco-Roman culture that was patriarchal. In this context, Paul’s teaching already elevated women by encouraging husbands to love sacrificially (Ephesians 5:25-28).
  • Ephesians 5:21: Paul begins this section by calling for mutual submission—“Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”
    • Greek word for “submit” (hupotassō): Voluntary cooperation, not forced control.
    • This passage is not about authoritarian male control, but about Christ-like sacrificial love and service within marriage.

B. 1 Corinthians 14:34-35: “Women Should Be Silent in Church”

  • This passage has often been used to exclude women from leadership.

  • Cultural Context: Corinth was dealing with chaos in worship services, and some scholars suggest that Paul was addressing a specific local issue of women interrupting services with questions.

  • Contradictory Practice: If Paul wanted women to be silent, why did he allow them to prophesy and pray publicly (1 Corinthians 11:5)?

    • This shows Paul was not banning women from speaking in all church contexts—he was addressing disorderly worship.

C. 1 Timothy 2:12: “I do not permit a woman to teach or have authority over a man.”

  • Contextual Clues:
    • The Greek word for “authority” here (authentein) is a rare term that can mean domineering or abusive control, not legitimate spiritual authority.
    • Paul was likely dealing with false teaching in Ephesus, where some women were promoting Gnostic or pagan ideas.

Conclusion: These passages reflect situational instructions, not universal doctrines. The First Church did not teach male-only headship as a strict rule for all time.

3. When Did Male-Only “Covering” Doctrines Appear?

A. No “Apostolic Covering” in the First Church

  • Christ Alone as the Head:
    The First Church recognized Christ as the head of the entire Church (Ephesians 1:22-23). There was no doctrine of “apostolic covering” or hierarchical control.

    • Matthew 23:8-10 (NIV): “You are not to be called ‘Rabbi,’ for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers.”
    • There was no single human leader or group controlling all Christians. Leadership was plural (elders, deacons) and collaborative.
  • Spiritual Covering as Mutual:
    Submission and accountability were mutual, based on relationship and service, not domination or control.

B. The Rise of “Headship” and “Covering” Doctrines (2nd-4th Century)

  • Post-First Century Church:
    As the church became more institutionalized and hierarchical, male-only authority became entrenched.

    • Bishops began claiming spiritual authority over entire regions, and patriarchy became the norm.
    • Council of Laodicea (4th century): Officially banned women from serving as priests.
  • Shepherding Movement (1970s):

    • The modern Shepherding Movement introduced strict doctrines of submission to male authority under the guise of “spiritual covering.”
    • This movement led to abuses of control, authoritarian leadership, and the subjugation of women, which is far removed from biblical teachings.
  • New Apostolic Reformation (NAR):
    NAR teachings often emphasize “apostolic authority” and “covering” doctrines, demanding submission to male leaders. This contradicts the servant leadership and mutual submission model of the First Church.

4. Biblical Training for a Sound Church Today

To avoid authoritarianism and distorted “headship” doctrines, training should focus on these biblical principles:

  1. Christ as the Only Head of the Church:

    • Ephesians 1:22-23: Jesus is the head, and all believers are equal under Him. No one should exercise domineering control.
  2. Servant Leadership:

    • Matthew 20:26: “Whoever wants to be great among you must be your servant.” Leaders should model humility and service, not control.
  3. Mutual Submission:

    • Ephesians 5:21: Teach mutual submission in all relationships—marriage, leadership, and community life.
  4. Empowerment of Women:

    • Galatians 3:28: “There is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ.” Women should be encouraged to lead and serve according to their gifts.
  5. Accountability Without Control:

    • Foster healthy relationships of accountability that are based on love, trust, and truth—not fear or domination.

Conclusion

The First Church did not promote authoritarian headship or male-only covering doctrines. These practices developed later due to cultural influences and church institutionalization. Returning to biblical principles of servant leadership, mutual submission, and Christ-centered authority is essential for building a healthy, sound Church today.

2. Was There “Apostolic Covering” or Control Over Women in the First Church?

The modern practice of “apostolic covering” (the idea that all believers, especially women, must submit to a higher spiritual authority to be legitimate or safe) is not found in New Testament teachings. While submission to Christ and mutual submission within the Body of Christ are biblical principles, Paul’s teachings on authority and submission have often been misinterpreted or culturally twisted to justify control over women. Let’s break this down biblically with insights from Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic:

A. Paul’s Teaching on Women and Silence in the Church (1 Corinthians 14:34-35)

  • 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 (KJV):
    “Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.”

  • Context and Cultural Background:
    In Corinth, the church meetings were often chaotic, with interruptions and disruptions. This passage is best understood as a cultural correction rather than an eternal prohibition on women’s participation. Many scholars believe Paul was addressing certain disruptive women in Corinth who were asking questions or making comments during services in a manner that caused disorder.

  • Greek Word Analysis:

    • “Silence” (Greek: “sigao”) does not necessarily mean absolute silence but rather “a quiet or respectful demeanor.”
    • Paul uses this same word for prophets and others in the church who are to speak “one by one” (1 Corinthians 14:27-33) to avoid confusion.
    • Submission (Greek: “hupotasso”) in this passage does not mean inferiority but voluntary, orderly cooperation (as seen in Ephesians 5:21: “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ”).
  • Paul’s True View on Women Speaking:
    Paul actually encouraged women to prophesy and pray publicly:

    • 1 Corinthians 11:5: “Every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head.”
      If women were to remain completely silent, why would Paul address how they should conduct themselves while speaking?

Conclusion: Paul’s instruction on women “keeping silent” was a temporary, situational correction, not a doctrinal prohibition on women’s participation or leadership.\

B. Women in Leadership Roles in the First Church

Women were active leaders in the First Church, with prominent roles in ministry:

  1. Phoebe (Romans 16:1-2)

    • Paul referred to Phoebe as a “deacon” (Greek: “diakonos”) of the church in Cenchrea. The term “diakonos” was used for both men and women in leadership roles and is often translated as “minister” or “servant.”
    • Paul instructed the Roman church to “help her in whatever she may need,” demonstrating her authority and role in ministry.
  2. Priscilla (Acts 18:26)

    • Priscilla, alongside her husband Aquila, taught the prominent preacher Apollos more accurately about the gospel. She is often mentioned before her husband, which may indicate her greater prominence in ministry.
  3. Junia (Romans 16:7)

    • Paul called Junia “outstanding among the apostles.” Despite attempts by later translators to masculinize her name, early church fathers recognized Junia as a female apostle.

C. Head Coverings and “Covering by Men” (1 Corinthians 11:3-16)

Some interpret 1 Corinthians 11 as requiring women to be “under” male authority due to Paul’s discussion of head coverings. However:

  • Headship:

    • 1 Corinthians 11:3: “The head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.”
      The Greek word for “head” (kephale) can mean “source” or “origin” rather than authority. Paul may have been referencing the creation order, where woman came from man (Genesis 2:22).
  • Mutual Submission:
    Paul’s teaching in Ephesians 5:21-33 clarifies that Christian relationships are based on mutual submission and love, not authoritarian control. Husbands are to love their wives sacrificially, just as Christ loved the church.

  • Cultural Context:
    Head coverings in Corinth were a cultural symbol of honor and respect. Paul’s concern was not about control but about maintaining order and cultural sensitivity.

Apostolic Sister Taveau asks this specifically for the sake of most non LP style of visitor, newbie, attender females, singles, leader women 

REASON: Due to many LP “Witch watching, seductive Jezebel” “Boys Club Ministry’ USA disturbing, accusing, gender biased ministry reactions.= Predatory Ministry (not always everwhere… but more than a few times is OVERLY MUCH)

Q.  Did the First Church Teach Women Were Dangerous or Inferior?

ChatGPT answers:

There is no evidence in the New Testament that Jesus or the Apostles taught that women were second-class, out of control, or in need of male domination. Instead:

  • Jesus’ Example: Jesus broke social and religious norms by treating women with dignity, teaching them (Luke 10:38-42), and commissioning them as the first witnesses of His resurrection (Matthew 28:1-10).
  • Galatians 3:28: Paul declared, “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” This verse reflects the equal spiritual status of men and women in Christ.
  • No Biblical Basis for Apostolic Covering or Women as Inferior: Paul’s teachings, when read in their proper cultural and linguistic context, emphasize mutual respect, spiritual equality, and orderly worship, not authoritarian control or gender-based suppression. The First Church demonstrated
  • No Biblical Basis for Apostolic Covering or Women as Inferior: Paul’s teachings, when read in their proper cultural and linguistic context, emphasize mutual respect, spiritual equality, and orderly worship, not authoritarian control or gender-based suppression. The First Church demonstrated
  • SUBMISSION OF WOMEN: TAVEAU ADDRESSES prior to us asking Chat GPT AI
  • The heated discussion around “submission” rings out far and wide with accusations, as it is misunderstood and often appears to be taught through a passed-down Old Testament Law lens—at least in certain deep grassroots circles where saintly dysfunction, Bible churches, and the practice of accusing “unsubmitted church hoppers” reside.

    I wish to clarify this topic and defrag “accusation” from it from the witch-watching, self-seeking, ambushes, friendly fire rumors, targeting, and praying against others. My goal is to teach and define “submission” in a fair manner—not as my personal opinion, but through the lens of Christian First Church history, which is sure to be more objective.

    I submit this to each reader for discernment, encouraging a comparison with what is found in the Bible, and urging refraining from Bible-stomping just because one may fully agree or disagree.

Taveau asks ChatGPT AI

Please teach in Greek, Aramaic, Hebrew, First Church, Paul and Jesus Bible about “two caring Christians, man and woman, being legally wed and then dwelling in the First Church Ephesians 5:21 “mutual submission in the fear of the Lord” and also 5:22 “wives be submitted,etc”

Chat GPT  heartily replies:

Ephesians 5:21-22 discusses the concept of mutual submission and the relationship between husband and wife, particularly within the context of Christian marriage. To understand it fully, we need to explore it using the Greek terms and the cultural framework of the First Church.

Ephesians 5:21-22 (KJV):

“Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.”

Greek Context of Key Terms

  1. Ephesians 5:21“Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.”

    • Greek word for “submitting” is ὑποτάσσω (hypotássō).
      • This word is often translated as “submission,” but its literal meaning is “to arrange oneself under.”
      • In Greek military terms, it referred to troops arranging themselves under a leader. However, in non-military contexts (which applies here), it implies voluntary cooperation and support.
    • “One to another” emphasizes mutual submission, implying that both the husband and wife submit to each other out of reverence for Christ.
  2. Ephesians 5:22“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.”

    • The verb “submit” is implied in verse 22 from verse 21. In Greek, it actually reads “Wives, to your husbands as to the Lord.”
    • The idea of submission here does not mean domination or hierarchy, but a loving partnership where each partner fulfills their role with humility and mutual respect.

Cultural Context of Marriage in the First Church

  • During the early Christian church, the societal norm was heavily patriarchal.
  • Paul’s teachings in Ephesians 5:21-33 were revolutionary because they elevated the role of women and marriage beyond the cultural expectations of the time.
  • Instead of a one-sided “obedience,” Paul calls both husband and wife to imitate the relationship of Christ and the Church.

Submission in Light of Mutual Love (Ephesians 5:25-28)

  • Paul continues with an even stronger command to husbands in verse 25:

    • “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her.”
    • The Greek word here for “love” is ἀγαπάω (agapaō), meaning self-sacrificial, unconditional love.
    • This implies that the husband’s love is not authoritarian or selfish, but one of self-giving, service, and cherishing.
  • The First Church would have understood this as a radical leveling of the marital relationship. A husband who loves like Christ puts his wife’s well-being above his own needs, mirroring the mutual submission of verse 21.

Jesus’ Teachings on Marriage

  • Jesus’ own teachings align with Paul’s:
    • Matthew 19:4-6 (KJV): “…For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh.”
    • This reflects the unity and oneness God designed for marriage. Jesus upheld the sanctity of marriage and emphasized that it was intended as a covenant of love and partnership.

Hebrew and Aramaic Influence

  • Hebrew culture taught the importance of shalom (peace) in relationships, which is a major theme in Jewish marriage.
  • Aramaic phrases used for marriage ceremonies in the First Century also emphasized unity, respect, and mutual blessing. The relationship was not meant to be one-sided but rather a partnership grounded in covenant love.

Summary of First Church Understanding

  • Ephesians 5:21-22 in the First Church context teaches mutual submission and self-sacrificial love, with neither partner lording authority over the other.
  • The husband’s role is modeled on Christ’s humility and service.
  • The wife’s submission is voluntary, not forced, and reflects trust and partnership.
  • Jesus’ teaching reinforced marriage as a relationship of unity, love, and oneness under God’s covenant.
  • (More later another part of this series)

Taveau inquires, due to Church Folk, mainly men, behavior:

Many Christian leaders, pastors, and others are concerned that the “average woman” is out to take over, “prowl for Christian men,” and is considered “weak-willed, easily led, and gullible,” largely due to the teaching from Genesis 3 about Eve being deceived.

I disagree with this general perspective, as it appears to be a deeply ingrained doctrine that unfairly marks women, accusing them of the worst qualities. Yet, due to the behavior of Christians on many dating apps, in real life, at lot of this makes it appear to be “so.”

Taveau’s Opinion
However, I know “subcultures” and NOT ALL CHRISTIAN subcultures do that (many in the churches sleeping around, desperate , lone, many baby mamas,  the worst of Tinder style dating, all of that) Dallas showed me so much of these, had never been dismissed as a “type” before, or “withstood, blocked” for showing up in a Christian ministry . EYE OPENERS to produced “character, doctrinal realism” (!!)

MY TIP: train the young boys, youth, singles, older.. not to behave that way and the girls, teens, single, women, NOT to settle, “SELF RESPECT” “seek a Holy Fear of the Lord New Move” Good convention but also hand one GREAT non neglectful careful Parenting, Fathers rise up, to respect the MOTHERS, WIVES and mainly GIRLS… PURPOSE to please the most High God First,to build a new healthy Christian Centric respectful True Non Gender Biased, pure Church

REALISTIC yet not quite  so puritanical, squeaky clean, easily shocked super saint, self righteous or ‘Bible beat down, accuser fear inspirit judging, Levitcal Law (reality and practicality, hands on discussions)

Plus: This “very biased, negative view of Christian women/women in all walks of life in general,  may  stem from Paul’s teachings in 1 Timothy 2:3-6, which suggest that women are expected to be “weaker” and more vulnerable to seduction, sin, and being preyed upon. I want to challenge and reframe this thinking, noting that it is important to also evaluate the story of Eli and his two sons in 1 Samuel, along with Hannah’s role.

In light of these biblical teachings, my question is:

  1. Why are pastors, leaders, home leaders, and parents not training women to stand stronger in their faith and identity, instead of perpetuating these stereotypes?
  2. Why aren’t men being equally challenged to assume responsibility for their behavior and training, as seen in scriptures like 2 Timothy 3:6, in order to create a safer and more respectful environment within God’s house?
  3. How can we address the issue of labeling women based on outdated or misinterpreted doctrines that portray them as weak or easily deceived?
  4. How can the church shift towards a more balanced, respectful understanding of both men and women in leadership and spiritual roles
  5. I ADVISE BOTH OF THESE CHRISTIAN MEN, WOMEN, LAST DAYS IMPROVEMENTS

Prophet, Teacher Spiritual Mother,Ancient of Days in Ministry Body: teaches “In this Last Move of the Lord, it may be just before He comes. So we really want to seek HIM FIRST and put HIM first in our actions, characters (for it’s not about ‘getting MY BLESSING’,getting PROMOTED to the next Level, performing for MONEY) No. it’s about Him

Eli and the Big Boys Club “Boys will be boys” double standard.

IN light of I Samuel Evil Eye Eli Temple High Priesthood Male ministry having a double standard, I teach 

NO MORE (NAIVE, FRAIDY, CLUELESS) OR UNEQUAL “DOUBLE STANDARD” FOR THE CHRISTIAN BOYS, YOUTH, ADULT MEN, MINISTER VS THE GIRLS, TEENS,  YOUNG WOMEN, SINGLES, DIVORCED, WIDOWED OLDER ADULT WOMEN.

NO MORE OF THE LEADER DOUBLE STANDARD.

We close this now.. due to length, but I’ve gotten started Christian Mean  And Women. Adam and Eve especially and a lot more about Apostle Paul “women keep silent’ and MORE.

God bless

Taveau D’Arcy

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under internation copyright laws, in conjunction with AI