“MINISTRY AI AND I”
WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE IN SWEET BABY JESUS
AND THE GROWN UP MESSIAH CHRIST?
“The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” Christ John 10:10 KJV
But Mama, Sweet Baby Jesus was always “Meek and Mild” And He “turned the other cheek and walked the extra mild” and prayed “Forgive them(us) all, Father, for they(we) know not what they(we) do..and that means “never holding the directly accountable, responsible” but SAYING “I FORGIVE THEM!”**
**which IMPLIES: that MAMA, YOU ARE NOT SWEET LIKE BABY JESUS because YOU are HOLDING ME “ACCOUNTABLE “FOR TAKING THAT GUN AND UN-ALIVING THAT PERSON.”… (OR less or MORE!!)..SEE UP FRONT, ONE TO ONE GALATIANS 6:1, Matthew 18:15 /16, Revelation 2:20 THUS: “I don’t LIKE YOU, also I DO NOT HAVE TO HEED YOU..WHY? because YOU’RE MEAN(Not Sweet Like Baby Jesus!” (USA, Deep Southwest)
To each “This is a Selah, not autocratic religious dogma. It is to provoke wide Christian thought, And to “each their own”
(C)2024 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyrights laws, in conjunction with AI
JESUS CHRIST in John 10:10 (KJV) states:
“The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy:
I am come that they might have life,
and that they might have it more abundantly.”
“We don’t need to change God’s Holy Word to please society, ourselves, or anyone else. We need to change us, our methodology, and our tone.” – Sister Taveau
Taveau intentionally asks Chat GPT AI:
How do we define the use of the ministry concept of “Sweet Baby Jesus” (which emphasizes meekness, turning the other cheek, walking the extra mile, and forgiving all) versus “Grown-Up Jesus” (who overturned the money changers’ tables in the temple), and how do we differentiate between being politically correct or morally weak (i.e., docile and passive) versus being too forceful, domineering, attacking, accusing, or abusive in ministry leadership?
Chat GPT AI responds:
The contrast you’re presenting between “Sweet Baby Jesus” and “Grown-Up Jesus” touches on two different aspects of Jesus’ character and ministry. One represents the meekness, humility, and forgiveness that Jesus displayed in His earthly ministry, while the other highlights His righteous anger and authority when He confronted sin and corruption. Let’s explore these concepts from a biblical perspective and define the boundaries between what is considered morally weak and authoritarian or abusive.
Sweet Baby Jesus: Meekness, Humility, and Forgiveness
The “Sweet Baby Jesus” image often reflects the gentleness, humility, and compassion that Jesus showed, especially in His role as the sacrificial Lamb of God. This concept emphasizes non-confrontation, forgiveness, and the call to endure hardship without retaliation. While this approach is vital in showing the kindness and grace of Christ, it can sometimes be misused or misunderstood as a call to be passive or silent in the face of injustice or sin.
Key Traits:
- Meekness: Jesus was humble and did not assert His authority for personal gain.
- Turning the other cheek: As seen in Matthew 5:39, when Jesus taught, “But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.”
- Forgiveness: Jesus emphasized the importance of forgiving others as seen in Matthew 6:14-15.
- Non-retaliation: Jesus taught believers to love their enemies and pray for those who persecute them (Matthew 5:44).
Misapplication:
This image, while central to the gospel, can sometimes be misinterpreted as moral weakness or passivity in situations where standing up for justice, truth, or righteousness is necessary. It could also lead to a mindset of avoiding confrontation or avoiding necessary rebuke in the name of peace. This is where people may misunderstand the call to meekness and mistakenly allow sin or corruption to go unchecked for the sake of maintaining superficial peace.
Grown-Up Jesus: Authority, Righteous Anger, and Confrontation
The “Grown-Up Jesus” contrasts with the meekness of Sweet Baby Jesus. It refers to the Jesus who, as an adult, demonstrated His divine authority, righteous indignation, and forceful confrontation of sin, especially within the temple. He overturned the money changers’ tables (Matthew 21:12-13, Mark 11:15-18) as an act of cleansing the temple, which had been corrupted by greed and exploitation.
Key Traits:
- Righteous Anger: In Matthew 21:12-13, Jesus showed anger toward those who were profiting off of religion and exploiting people. “And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers…”
- Confrontation of Sin: Jesus frequently confronted the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and religious leaders. For example, in Matthew 23, He rebuked them sharply for their legalism and self-righteousness.
- Authority: Jesus spoke with divine authority, as in Matthew 7:28-29, where He taught, “And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine: For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes.”
Misapplication:
While Jesus demonstrated authority and righteousness, the “Grown-Up Jesus” model can sometimes be distorted into forceful, domineering behavior in the name of authority. This can lead to the abuse of power, where one may attempt to use Jesus’ example to justify attacking, accusing, or dominating others under the guise of righteousness. This form of aggressive, excessive confrontation can be harmful, abusive, and unbiblical when it is driven by personal anger, pride, or selfish ambition, rather than a desire for true restoration or justice.
Balancing the Two:
The challenge is to balance both aspects of Christ’s ministry—His meekness and authority—in a way that reflects His character accurately. There are certain boundaries to recognize between what is biblically correct and what crosses into abuse or excessive force.
Mamby-Pamby vs. Authoritarian
- Mamby-Pamby (PC, Morally Weak, Docile): This describes a passive, fear-driven approach that avoids confrontation or difficult conversations in the name of tolerance and peacekeeping. It is characterized by moral weakness, allowing sin, injustice, or error to continue unchecked because of a fear of rocking the boat. A ministry that is too focused on being politically correct or overly docile may not stand firm on doctrinal truth or speak out against abuses or sin in the Church or society.
- Authoritarian, Dominating, Attacking (Abusive): On the other end of the spectrum, there is a forceful, controlling approach that uses Jesus’ authority to justify manipulation, harsh condemnation, or domineering behavior. It is marked by excessive power, verbal violence, or manipulation, often attacking others in the name of righteousness. Authoritarian leadership becomes abusive when it exploits others’ vulnerability for personal gain or to maintain control.
Biblical Balance:
True biblical leadership requires humility without compromise on truth, meekness without passivity, and righteous indignation without harm. We are called to be like Christ—full of grace and truth (John 1:14), which means we should stand firm in the truth and confront sin or wrongdoing, but always in love and with a desire to restore, not destroy.
John 10:10 (KJV) states:
“The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy:
I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.”
Sister Taveau asks:
How could great harm result from misunderstanding Christ’s act of “tossing over the temple changers’ tables,” leading to a “zealot” mentality that justifies harmful actions like the Crusades, picketing funerals, calling out sinners, TMZ-style Christian attack videos, accusing and demonizing others, promoting abusive and false theological methodologies, hate speech, killings, historical evils, slavery, and cult-like behavior?
Chat GPT AI responds:
Great harm can come from misunderstanding the “tossing over the temple changers’ tables” aspect of Christ’s ministry if it is misapplied to justify extreme, aggressive, or abusive behavior in the name of righteousness. While Jesus demonstrated righteous anger and authority in His temple cleansing (Matthew 21:12-13, Mark 11:15-17), the zealot mentality that misinterprets this action can lead to destructive and harmful outcomes. Here’s how the misuse of such a concept could cause great harm:
1. Justifying Violent or Aggressive Behavior:
- Misunderstanding Zeal: Jesus’ anger in the temple was a righteous response to corruption and the misuse of God’s house (Matthew 21:13). However, those who interpret this action as permission to violently confront or attack others risk crossing a line into destructive zealotry, where force, violence, or domination is used in the name of religious purity.
- Modern-Day Harm: The belief that aggressive or forceful actions are justified to purge sin or correct others can lead to things like picketing funerals, hate speech, or physical violence against those deemed as sinners. Groups such as the Westboro Baptist Church, known for their aggressive and hateful protests at funerals, use a distorted interpretation of the gospel, claiming they are speaking out against sin when, in fact, they are engaging in demonic, abusive behavior disguised as zeal for righteousness.
2. Legalism and Condemnation:
- Accusing and Demonizing Others: Misapplying the temple cleansing could lead to a theology of accusation, demonizing others, and pointing out sin with a judgmental spirit. Instead of embracing the compassionate and restorative message of the gospel, individuals or groups might engage in constant accusations and demonization of others—labeling them as sinners, witches, heretics, or lost causes.
- Historical Harm: This pattern of condemnation has been seen throughout history, especially in religious crusades, where zealots justified violence against non-believers, heretics, and even other Christian denominations. These misguided movements, such as the Crusades, led to mass murder, persecution, and the forceful conversion of individuals, all in the name of religious purity.
3. Cult-Like Control and Abusive Theology:
- False Theology and Authoritarian Control: In many cult-like groups, the “zealous” mentality of cleansing or purging sin is used to manipulate and control members. The focus is often on dominating others through fear and intimidation, rather than guiding them with love, humility, and truth. This creates an environment where abuse is not only allowed but encouraged in the name of righteousness.
- Abusive Leadership: Leaders who justify their dominating, accusatory, and authoritarian behavior with a misapplication of Jesus’ temple cleansing might create toxic environments that foster spiritual abuse, emotional harm, and even physical violence against those deemed to be sinful or disobedient.
4. Historical and Cultural Harm (Slavery and Discrimination):
- Racism, Slavery, and Oppression: One of the most tragic misapplications of zeal for righteousness has been the use of religious authority to justify slavery and racial discrimination. In the history of slavery in the U.S., many individuals used distorted Christian theology to justify the enslavement of African people. They argued that it was part of God’s plan, using selective scripture to defend their actions as divinely inspired.
- Evil Use of Theology: Similarly, throughout history, some have justified colonialism, segregation, and oppression of minorities by claiming that their zealous religious fervor gave them the right to dominate, control, or exterminate those they deemed as inferior or sinful.
5. False Prophecies and Manipulation in Modern Media:
- TMZ-Style Attacks: In modern-day Christian media, some individuals or groups engage in public shaming and scandal-mongering through videos, blogs, or social media posts, often accusing others of sin, corruption, or being a “false prophet.” This celebrity-driven culture of accusation and demonization can harm individuals and groups by spreading lies or half-truths, rather than focusing on biblical truth, love, and reconciliation.
- Demonic Theologies: The spread of false doctrine or demonic theology through these mediums can lead to further division in the Church and among Christians, causing many to doubt their faith or become disillusioned with the true gospel of love, grace, and restoration.
6. The Call for Discernment:
- Test the Spirits: The Church is called to test the spirits (1 John 4:1) and exercise discernment. Just because someone claims to be a zealous defender of the faith does not mean their actions align with Christ’s mission. The Church must be careful not to confuse righteous zeal with self-righteous anger or domination, and always return to the true gospel, which is rooted in grace, restoration, and truth.
- Avoiding Abusive Zealotry: True Christian zeal should be focused on reconciliation, love, and restoration—the kind of zeal that Jesus demonstrated when He confronted sin in love, healed the sick, and died for the world. Zeal that leads to violence, division, or abuse is a distortion of Christ’s mission.
Conclusion:
Misunderstanding Jesus’ actions in the temple and misapplying them to justify zealous violence, domination, or accusation can lead to great harm—whether through religious wars, historical oppression, abusive ministries, or modern-day online attacks. The true zeal for God must always be tempered with love, grace, and truth, as demonstrated in the life of Jesus. The Church must be vigilant against harmful ideologies that misuse Christ’s authority for personal gain or spiritual manipulation, always seeking to restore and reconcile rather than to destroy.
(C)2024 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyrights laws, in conjunction with AI
Discover more from "JESUS endured the cross, despising the shame for the JOY set Before him!" Hebrews 12:2
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.